Cell Rep Med. 2026 Mar 30:102708. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102708. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) undermines transcriptome-based stratification in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Here, we integrate multi-omics data from multi-region, single-region, and single-cell RNA sequencing cohorts to systematically characterize gene expression ITH. We uncover that immune and stromal heterogeneity are primary drivers of ITH, leading to misclassification of a median 27.8% of tumors by existing subtyping systems. To overcome this, we identify a low-intratumor-heterogeneity/high-intertumor-variability (LIHV) gene set and develop an ITH-insensitive classification system defining five subgroups: inflammatory (SI), metabolic (SII), atypical (SIII-1), immune-silent (SIII-2), and neurodegenerative (SIII-3). These subgroups exhibit distinct clinical outcomes, molecular features, immune landscapes, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. GPRC5A and VTCN1 serve as robust immunohistochemical biomarkers for SI and SIII tumors, while serum CEA and CA19-9 identify inflammatory iCCA. Therapeutically, HSP90 inhibition synergizes with anti-PD1 in inflammatory iCCA, whereas combined anti-PD1 and anti-TIM3 suppresses neurodegenerative iCCA. Collectively, our study provides a robust molecular framework and actionable therapeutic strategies for iCCA.

PMID:41916296 | DOI:10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102708

Front Oncol. 2026 Feb 25;16:1743620. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1743620. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, yet current precision oncology approaches remain overwhelmingly tumor-centric, guided by genomic alterations and immune biomarkers, while largely neglecting the profound impact of aging biology on treatment response. While emerging evidence suggests that aging biology can modify therapeutic benefit and toxicity, its clinical integration remains uneven and largely investigational. In this review, we explicitly distinguish the chronological aging from biological aging to clarify how host biology modifies therapeutic benefit and toxicity. We synthesize mechanistic, translational, and early clinical evidence, while explicitly noting areas where prospective validation is lacking, to reframe personalization of lung cancer therapy through an age-conscious lens. We summarize data indicating that immunosenescence is associated with T-cell exhaustion, myeloid dominance, and extracellular matrix stiffening, features that may contribute to immune-evasive tumor phenotypes and attenuated responses to immune checkpoint blockade in subsets of patients, while pediatric cases, though rare, illustrate how global precision initiatives like iTHER and ZERO enable cautious adaptation of adult therapies. Moving beyond chronological age, we discuss biological age biomarkers, including PhenoAgeAccel, epigenetic clocks, telomere length, and frailty indices, which outperform traditional metrics in predicting risk, resistance, and toxicity, and propose integrating these tools into trial design, screening, and care planning which show promise for risk stratification and toxicity prediction but are not yet validated for routine treatment selection. Looking forward, we outline investigational strategies at the intersection of geroscience and oncology, including immune engineering, senolytics, microenvironmental modulation, and AI-driven multi-omic modeling. Overall, this review argues that biological age represents a critical but still underdeveloped dimension of precision oncology, and highlights key evidence gaps that must be addressed before age-aware personalization can be implemented in routine lung cancer care.

PMID:41821888 | PMC:PMC12975599 | DOI:10.3389/fonc.2026.1743620