❌

Normal view

Multi-Omics and Single-Cell Mendelian Randomization Reveal a Potential Role of VNN2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma in Resting Natural Killer Cells

13 March 2026 at 18:00

World J Oncol. 2026 Mar 5;17(2):247-255. doi: 10.14740/wjon2689. eCollection 2026 Apr.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the potential association between genetically predicted vanin-2 (VNN2) expression and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) risk, and to explore the immune cell subtype that may underlie this relationship.

METHODS: We integrated whole-blood expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data from eQTLGen, plasma protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) data from deCODE, and LUAD genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from European-ancestry cohorts, together with differential expression analysis using GEPIA2, to identify candidate genes for subsequent single-cell eQTL (sc-eQTL) Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. For the sc-eQTL analysis, VNN2-associated eQTLs from 14 immune cell types profiled in the OneK1K single-cell eQTL resource were tested for associations with LUAD risk.

RESULTS: Bulk-level MR analysis showed that genetically predicted increases in VNN2 expression and protein levels were significantly associated with a reduced risk of LUAD (eQTL-MR: odds ratio (OR) = 0.964, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.934-0.995; P = 0.024; pQTL-MR: OR = 0.946, 95% CI, 0.921-0.970; P = 2.87 Γ— 10-5). Transcriptomic analyses confirmed significant downregulation of VNN2 in LUAD tumors compared with normal lung tissues. sc-eQTL MR identified the strongest association in resting natural killer (rNK) cells (OR = 0.896, 95% CI, 0.829-0.967; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS: Multi-omics and sc-eQTL MR analyses indicated that genetically predicted increases in VNN2 expression were associated with a reduced risk of LUAD, with the most pronounced effect observed in rNK cells. These findings suggest a potential cell type-specific role of VNN2 in LUAD susceptibility and warrant further studies to validate its biological relevance and clinical implications.

PMID:41822323 | PMC:PMC12978397 | DOI:10.14740/wjon2689

Profiling of the mycobiome and metabolome: a comparative study of benign pulmonary nodules and lung adenocarcinoma

11 March 2026 at 18:00

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2026 Feb 23;16:1732958. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1732958. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the most common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, is a form of malignant pulmonary nodule that requires clinical differentiation from benign pulmonary nodules (BPN). The mechanisms underlying the development of LUAD are complex, and effective non-invasive methods for differentiating BPN from LUAD are lacking. This study aimed not only to distinguish BPN from LUAD using gut fungi and serum metabolites, but also to establish an integrated network of gut fungi-metabolite-cytokine interactions.

METHODS: Fecal and serum samples from individuals with BPN and patients with LUAD were subjected to internal transcribed spacer sequencing, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and multiplex Luminex assays to quantify gut fungi, metabolites, and cytokines, respectively.

RESULTS: A significant difference in gut fungal communities was observed between the BPN and LUAD groups. Multiple genera and species were more abundant in LUAD than in BPN. Docosapentaenoic acid n-6 (DPAn-6), indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), and interferon-Ξ³-induced protein 10 (IP-10) were significantly elevated in the LUAD group. The integrated model established using a combination of gut fungi and metabolites demonstrated excellent performance in distinguishing BPN from LUAD. A network of interactions was established among differentially abundant gut fungi, serum metabolites, and cytokines.

CONCLUSION: Our study identifies a novel panel of fungal and metabolite biomarkers for differentiating between BPN and LUAD, and constructs a multi-omics network that provides new insights into investigating the mechanistic role of gut mycobiota dysbiosis in LUAD.

PMID:41809995 | PMC:PMC12968269 | DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2026.1732958

❌