❌

Normal view

Narrative review of the staging classification controversy in stage N3 small cell lung cancer: from the perspective of overlapping Veterans Administration Lung Study Group and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer definitions

11 September 2026 at 18:00

J Thorac Dis. 2026 Aug 31;18(8):950. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2026-1704. Epub 2026 Aug 28.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, two primary systems have been employed for staging small cell lung cancer (SCLC): the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALG) system and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system. The term "limited disease" is defined differently: VALG characterizes it as disease encompassed within a single tolerable radiation field, while IASLC defines it as the lack of distant metastases (M0). Patients with N3 disease frequently satisfy VALG extensive-stage (ES) criteria while meeting IASLC limited-stage (LS) criteria, resulting in a notable staging discrepancy. Therefore, this review aims to clarify the clinical challenges posed by this staging overlap and provide insights for standardizing staging terminology and optimizing therapeutic decision-making in N3 SCLC.

METHODS: A narrative review utilizing a systematized search strategy was conducted. While strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines was not pursued because the extensive heterogeneity of the literature precluded a formal meta-analysis, rigorous search criteria were applied to minimize selection bias. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for literature from January 2000 to March 2026. Studies examining stage N3 SCLC, spatial metastatic burden, and definitional inconsistencies between the VALG and IASLC staging systems were analyzed to assess their effects on treatment dosimetry, systemic therapy, and survival outcomes.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The staging overlap in N3 SCLC leads to heterogeneous clinical management depending on its spatial metastatic burden, and this highly variable cohort can be stratified into distinct prognostic subgroups based on the anatomical distribution (single-region vs. multi-region) of the involved lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings should guide clinical trial design and terminology. Clinical decision-making must transcend historical paradigms and technical constraints. Future strategies must incorporate spatial evaluations of metastatic burden alongside innovative multimodal tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and multi-omics, to facilitate tailored therapy for SCLC.

PMID:42724560 | PMC:PMC13559235 | DOI:10.21037/jtd-2026-1704

Integrated radiopathomics nomogram for predicting angiogenic microvascular patterns in NSCLC: a dual-center validation study

17 April 2026 at 18:00

Ann Med. 2026 Dec;58(1):2654291. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2026.2654291. Epub 2026 Apr 17.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To develop and validate an integrated radiopathomics nomogram combining multiphase CT images, H&E-stained slides, and clinicopathological variables for predicting microvascular patterns (MVPs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive surgically resected NSCLC patients from two centers (n = 258). Patients from center 1 were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts, while patients from center 2 formed external validation cohort. CD34-immunohistochemistry was used as the reference standard for MVPs to classify patients into non-angiogenic alveolar (NAA) and non-NAA groups. Radiomics and pathomics features were extracted to construct single-phase radiomics, combined radiomics, and pathomics models. Rad-score and Path-score were derived from combined radiomics and pathomics models, respectively. Rad-score, Path-score, and clinicopathological independent predictors were integrated to develop a nomogram. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and DeLong test.

RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, histological grade was an independent predictor of NAA MVP. Combined radiomics model for predicting MVPs achieved AUCs of 0.863, 0.856, and 0.849 in training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, showing better performance than single-phase models. Pathomics model yielded AUCs of 0.878, 0.860, and 0.833, however, its specificity markedly decreased in validation cohorts. Nomogram model achieved the superior performance across all cohorts, with AUCs of 0.911, 0.903, and 0.901, outperforming single-modality models (DeLong test: all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The nomogram demonstrated high accuracy and robustness in predicting MVPs in NSCLC, offering a promising tool for characterizing the tumor microenvironment and supporting individualized treatment.

PMID:41992828 | DOI:10.1080/07853890.2026.2654291

TRIM36 and CAMK2N2 regulate ferroptosis and antigen presentation in small cell lung cancer

6 April 2026 at 18:00

iScience. 2026 Mar 11;29(4):115310. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115310. eCollection 2026 Apr 17.

ABSTRACT

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Ferroptosis is closely linked to tumor antigen presentation: it affects antigen presentation efficiency via immunostimulatory signals, while CD8+ T cell activation induced by antigen presentation promotes tumor cell ferroptosis by secreting IFNΞ³. This study used multi-omics analyses and machine learning to screen key genes, verified by in vitro/in vivo experiments. TRIM36 and CAMK2N2 were significantly upregulated in SCLC, negatively correlating with patient survival, effector memory CD8+ T cell infiltration, and tumor MHC I expression. They suppress SCLC antigen presentation via ferroptosis-dependent/independent mechanisms, limiting T cell function. TRIM36 and CAMK2N2 are promising SCLC biomarkers and therapeutic targets, providing clues to unravel ferroptosis-antigen presentation associations in tumor cells and optimize immunotherapeutic strategies.

PMID:41940332 | PMC:PMC13049528 | DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115310

❌