npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02586-6
Comparison of AI-generated radiology impressions: a multi-stakeholder evaluation
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02596-4
Decipher-MR: a vision-language foundation model for 3D MRI representations
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02599-1
Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation and development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02563-z
An operational target trial emulation framework for causal inference using electronic health record data
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02594-6
A neural-symbolic AI agent system for biomedical concept mapping
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02573-x
HoloTrauma 3X Triadic AI Co reasoning for robot assisted emergency maxillofacial reconstruction
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02571-z
Developing psychosocial phenotypes to understand engagement with digital health technologies for heart failure
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02584-8
We re-evaluated GPT-5 using our published pipelines: 500 emergency vignettes across 32 sociodemographic labels for bias, and adversarial prompts with fabricated details. GPT-5 showed no measurable improvement over GPT-4o in sociodemographic-linked decision variation, with several LGBTQIA+ groups flagged for mental-health screening in 100% of cases. Adversarial hallucination rates were higher (65% vs 53% for GPT-4o); a mitigation prompt reduced this to 7.67%.
Login