Background: Expenditures for physiotherapy and extended outpatient physiotherapy (EAP) are increasing within Germany’s statutory accident insurance system (Berufsgenossenschaften), placing growing pressure on rehabilitation capacity and timely access to care. Digital health applications (DiGAs) are reimbursable nationwide and represent a novel component of routine rehabilitation pathways. However, their real-world system-level and economic effects in occupational rehabilitation remain insufficiently understood. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how the integration of DiGAs into occupational rehabilitation pathways may influence costs, service capacity, and waiting times within routine care delivered by 5 German statutory accident insurance funds that cover 25.9 million insured individuals. Methods: Aggregated administrative data from 5 Berufsgenossenschaften (fiscal years 2023‐2024) were analyzed using a multilevel simulation framework combining (1) probabilistic cost-consequence modeling with Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations), (2) an adherence-based adoption funnel distinguishing long-term engaged users (15%) and short-term users (85%) based on German claims data, and (3) a calibrated M/M/1 queuing model validated through discrete event simulation to estimate the effects on waiting times and system capacity. Primary outcomes included net financial impact, break-even thresholds, and changes in access-related performance metrics. Results: Combined physiotherapy and EAP expenditures reached €404 million (€1=US $1.18) in 2024, increasing by 10.1% year-over-year. The primary simulation (N=10,000 iterations) indicated mean annual net savings of €18.4 million (median €17.9 million) with a 90.7% probability of cost savings (95% uncertainty range: net cost of €8 million to net savings of €47.7 million). After incorporating adherence dynamics, the projected mean net savings were €16.2 million (95% CI €5-€29.8 million), corresponding to a 100% probability of positive financial impact within the modeled parameter space. Cost neutrality was maintained for DiGA prices up to €617.8 per prescription, nearly 40% above the base-case assumption of €450, indicating substantial economic robustness. Queuing analyses demonstrated that modest reductions in therapeutic demand decreased mean waiting times from 17.3 to 12.8 days (−26%), equivalent to approximately 120,000 cumulative patient waiting days saved annually across 26,705 EAP patients. The validation of discrete event simulation confirmed the magnitude and direction of analytic estimates. Conclusions: Under conservative assumptions, integrating digital therapeutics into occupational rehabilitation pathways is likely to generate both economic benefits and substantial system-level capacity gains. The break-even threshold of €617.80 per prescription provides a wide margin for pricing policy. Beyond cost effects, DiGAs may function as scalable capacity tools that alleviate systemic bottlenecks and improve timely access to rehabilitation services in capacity-constrained systems.

Background: YouTube is increasingly used for healthcasting, the sharing of evidence-based dietary and lifestyle interventions by domain experts. In the metabolic health domain, channels focused on therapeutic carbohydrate restriction have accumulated audiences of millions. A distinctive feature is the comment section, where viewers share first-person accounts of health changes, constituting a unique source of real-world outcome data at scale. However, extracting structured health information from unstructured comments presents computational challenges. Objective: This observational, cross-sectional study aims to develop and validate a precision-optimized computational framework for extracting self-reported health outcomes from healthcasting YouTube comments and to characterize the prevalence, distribution across health aspects, and channel-level variation of reported outcomes across a large-scale metabolic health corpus. Methods: This study analyzed 43,111 unique YouTube comments from 110 videos across 11 therapeutic carbohydrate restriction-focused healthcasting channels (37,458 unique authors; data span November 2013 to January 2026; collected via YouTube data application programming interface version 3). The methodology comprised 3 construction phases and 5 validation studies. The construction phases were (1) exploratory corpus characterization, (2) iterative development of a 35-aspect hierarchical health outcome ontology, and (3) precision-optimized rule-based classification, validated through precision validation (stratified sample of n=500), recall estimation (n=510), external validation on 5 held-out channels (n=12,653 comments), large language model–assisted interrater reliability assessment, and transformer baseline comparison against Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (ROBERTa) classifiers. A supplementary aspect–based sentiment analysis contextualized the positive-only design. Results: The framework identified 1790 positive health outcome reports (1790/43,111, 4.15% prevalence), achieving 97.6% (488/500) precision (95% CI 95.7%-98.6%) and estimated 56.2% recall (95% CI 43.4%-67.9%). The reports described 6674 positive outcomes, distributed across 35 health aspects and 18 named disease conditions extending beyond weight loss: pain and inflammation reduction (1137/6674, 17%), type 2 diabetes improvement (977/6674, 14.6%), skin health (784/6674, 11.8%), and psychological well-being (731/6674, 11%). Over half (3355/6674, 50.3%) spanned multiple research objectives. Significant channel-level variation was observed (χ²₁₀=927.5; P<.001), with positive outcome rates ranging from 1.32% to 10.40% (odds ratio 8.68, 95% CI 7.10-10.61). Transformer baselines achieved higher recall but lower precision, confirming their advantage for high-confidence corpus generation. A supplementary aspect-based sentiment analysis indicated a positive-to-negative ratio of approximately 4.6:1 (n=1003), with negative experiences (59/495, 11.9%) predominantly involving gastrointestinal and cardiovascular concerns. Conclusions: This study presents, to our knowledge, the first validated, rule-based framework for extracting self-reported metabolic health outcomes from healthcasting YouTube comments at corpus scale. Unlike existing recall-oriented social media health classifiers, the precision-optimized design achieves the confidence threshold required for outcomes research without manual review. These findings demonstrate that expert-led health content comment sections constitute a scalable, complementary data source for monitoring real-world engagement with dietary interventions, with implications for public health surveillance, platform design, and health communication research.

Background: Self-sovereign identity (SSI) provides a decentralized approach to digital identity management, enabling individuals to control their personal data without reliance on centralized authorities. Blockchain technology offers a tamper-resistant and distributed infrastructure that can support secure and verifiable identity systems. In health care, where identity fragmentation, privacy risks, and interoperability challenges persist, blockchain-enabled SSI (BC-SSI) has been proposed as a potential solution. However, existing research remains heterogeneous, with varying levels of technical maturity and limited evidence of real-world deployment. Objective: This study conducts a scoping review to systematically map BC-SSI applications in health care and to analyze their application domains, development stages, study aims, targeted challenges, and technological infrastructures. In addition, this study aims to identify structural gaps in current research and assess the readiness of BC-SSI systems for clinical deployment. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) methodology. A comprehensive literature search conducted between September 2024 and August 2025 identified 37 peer-reviewed studies that met predefined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and synthesized using descriptive and thematic analyses across application areas, system maturity, technological components, and reported challenges. Results: The findings indicate that BC-SSI research in health care remains at an early stage of maturity, with most studies proposing conceptual models or prototype implementations and limited real-world validation. Applications predominantly focus on identity verification, credential management, and privacy-preserving data exchange across domains such as electronic health records, mobile health, and access control systems. Commonly used technologies include decentralized identifiers, verifiable credentials, smart contracts, and privacy-enhancing mechanisms such as zero-knowledge proofs and selective disclosure. Despite rapid technical development, persistent challenges include interoperability limitations, governance gaps, usability concerns, and insufficient integration with health care infrastructures. Notably, a structural gap was identified between technological capability and system-level readiness for clinical deployment. Conclusions: BC-SSI technologies demonstrate potential for enabling secure, interoperable, and patient-centric identity management in health care. However, current research is predominantly technology-driven and lacks sufficient system-level validation. This study highlights the need for integrated architectural approaches, governance frameworks, and real-world evaluation to bridge the gap between conceptual innovation and clinical implementation. Advancing BC-SSI toward health care adoption will require coordinated progress across technical, organizational, and regulatory dimensions.

Background: The application of generative artificial intelligence to simplify medication use instructions has the potential to enhance people’s health by improving treatment adherence. Objective: We evaluated the performance of large language models (LLMs) in generating medication usage instructions to complement prescriptions in primary health care. Methods: This randomized, blinded experimental preclinical study used prescription-inducing scenarios, assigned to 62 health care professionals, to validate instructions generated by LLMs during electronic prescriptions. The instructions were generated by ChatGPT-4.0 (OpenAI), Llama3.1-8B (Meta), and Llama3.1-8B-RAG (Meta) using retrieval-augmented generation based on patient information leaflets. Performance metrics assessed adequacy, completeness, clarity, language simplification, usefulness, and errors in the generated instructions, with scores to analyze overall and individual metrics. Results: The 3 models yielded high overall scores for producing qualified instructions (ChatGPT-4.0: median 88.4, IQR 22.8; Llama3.1-8B: median 66.5, IQR 50.9; Llama3.1-8B-RAG: median 79.9, IQR 34.4; Kruskal-Wallis test P=.003). Llama3.1-8B-RAG received evaluations with similar overall scores to ChatGPT-4.0 (post hoc test, P=.05) and similar to Llama3.1-8B (post hoc test, P=.44). ChatGPT-4.0 outperformed Llama3.1-8B (Bonferroni test, P<.001). Regarding specific domains, Llama3.1-8B-RAG received scores equivalent to those of ChatGPT-4.0 for adequacy (mean 6.24, SD 2.3 vs mean 6.82, SD 2.1; post hoc test, P=.54); completeness (mean 5.94, SD 2.2 vs 6.55, SD 1.9; post hoc test P=.38), clarity (mean 5.77, SD 2.4 vs mean 6.68, SD 1.9; post hoc test P=.09), and usefulness (mean 5.42, SD 2.4 vs mean 5.96, SD 2.2; post hoc test P=.63). ChatGPT-4.0 received higher scores in the language simplification criterion than Llama3.1-8B-RAG (mean 7.05, SD 1.5 vs mean 5.44, SD 2.6; post hoc test P<.001). Interrater variability in assigning scores ranged from 4.2% (n=3) to 85.8% (n=6) among primary health care professionals. Instructions leading to incorrect use of the medication had similar frequency among the models(ChatGPT-4.0: n=15, 22.7%; Llama3.1-8B: n=19, 22.8%; Llama3.1-8B-RAG: n=19, 22.8%; chi-square test P=.71). The frequencies of hallucination were similar (ChatGPT-4.0: n=7, 10.6%; Llama3.1-8B: n=9, 13.6%; Llama3.1-8B-RAG: n=6, 9.1%; chi-square test P=.67). Conclusions: The open-source LLM enhanced with external information presented similar performance to the closed-source model, except for ChatGPT4.0, which was superior in language simplification of messages. LLM generation demonstrated potential for instructing patients on medication use. Nonetheless, the introduction of this innovation into the electronic prescribing workflow demands prescriber validation for human oversight of the technology and requires a strategy for LLM performance governance.

Background: Patients with tracheal diseases often require long-term follow-up after tracheal device placement, with a risk of adverse events that may lead to emergency care and unplanned interventions. Telemedicine has been proposed as an alternative to in-person follow-up to improve access and continuity of care. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the need for emergency department (ED) visits between telemedicine and in-person groups. Secondary objectives included comparing hospital readmissions, 30-day hospital readmissions, and unplanned interventions between groups. Methods: This retrospective, single-institution study included adult patients with tracheal devices who underwent telemedicine and in-person outpatient clinic visits between 2020 and 2024. To balance the groups, we used 1:1 propensity score matching. We collected demographic and clinical data and evaluated the need for ED visits, hospital readmissions, 30-day hospital readmissions, and unplanned interventions. Kaplan-Meier estimation of time to first ED visit was performed to assess outcomes after outpatient visits. Results: A total of 483 patients (n=277, 57% telemedicine and n=206, 43% in-person) underwent 2487 visits (1258 telemedicine and 1229 in-person). After propensity score matching, 336 patients remained (168 in each group). There were no significant differences in the need for ED visits, hospital readmissions, or unplanned interventions. The telemedicine group had significantly fewer 30-day hospital readmissions (odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.87; =.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in ED-free visits. Conclusions: Telemedicine follow-up was associated with outcomes comparable to those of in-person follow-up in this cohort of adult patients with tracheal devices, with no evidence of an increased need for ED visits. In the matched analysis, telemedicine was associated with lower odds of 30-day hospital readmission.

Background: Increasing mental demands across multiple life domains underscore the importance of effective individual stress management to mitigate the adverse health consequences of chronic stress. Growing evidence suggests that virtual reality (VR) interventions constitute an effective approach to stress reduction. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine and compare application areas of VR interventions for stress reduction in the general population and to identify potential predictors of effectiveness based on sample characteristics and intervention design. Methods: Five databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of VR interventions for stress reduction in the general population. Studies were included if they primarily focused on stress reduction, included a neutral control condition, and reported a validated measurement of perceived stress. Trials targeting mental disorders or those conducted in the context of medical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. Effects were synthesized using pooled standardized mean differences, and relevant predictors were evaluated through subgroup analyses and meta-regressions. Results: A total of 55 relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, with 37 investigating single-session and 18 multisession interventions (ranging from 1 to 42 sessions over 2 days to 6 months). The meta-analysis included 39 studies with 4024 participants (sample sizes 24‐409; mean ages 19.2‐70.6 years). Intervention types included VR-based nature exposure (21), biophilic architectural elements (6), guided meditation (9), interactive tasks (4), and other approaches (1). On average, VR interventions significantly reduced perceived stress level (−0.55, 95% CI −0.70 to −0.40;

Background: Rapid developments in artificial intelligence (AI) will enable its widespread use in radiological diagnostics in the near future. Patients will then be confronted with findings generated with the help of AI. Understanding patients’ perspectives on the use of this technology is one of the key factors for its successful implementation. Objective: This qualitative study aimed to gain insight into patients’ reasoning about the opportunities and risks of using AI in radiological diagnosis, to identify prerequisites for its acceptance, and to identify aspects that can promote trust in AI diagnoses, especially in scenarios of high personal concern. Methods: A total of 7 focus groups were conducted with 34 patients (n=15, 44% female participants) aged between 23 and 85 years (mean 49.06, SD 17.08 y), recruited using purposive sampling strategies. Each focus group was audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using the method of structured qualitative content analysis. Results: Study findings show that patients are open to the use of AI in radiological diagnostics. The basic prerequisites for this are (1) scientific evidence of safe outcomes that are more accurate and faster than those without AI; (2) recognizable added value in patient care; (3) transparency in the use of AI and disclosure to the patient; (4) comprehensive, binding measures for quality assurance; and (5) the use of AI solely to support the physician. However, the results indicate that further criteria are important for patients to be willing to choose a radiologist who uses AI and to trust AI diagnoses. In situations where they are personally affected, patients fear that physicians will place too much trust in the AI result and that the physician-patient relationship will become dehumanized. Therefore, the physicians’ abilities and functions that inspire trust from the patients’ perspective must come into play. These include (1) an independent diagnosis by the physician that takes into account not only the clinical context but also the individuality of the patient, (2) a comprehensible explanation of the pros and cons of using AI for patients and clear communication of AI output, and (3) a humane and empathetic physician-patient relationship, which shows that the physician continues to feel responsible for the patient. Conclusions: The results of the study underscore that a high quality of the entire “sociotechnical” system is an essential prerequisite for patient acceptance of the use of AI in radiological diagnostics and for trust in AI diagnoses. The further development of AI performance must go hand in hand with the creation of framework conditions for its use that meet patients’ expectations of the role of the physician and ensure a trust-building physician-patient relationship. The study provides valuable insights into how such integration of AI into radiological practice can be achieved.

Vornhagen and colleagues synthesize design practices for the development of health care dashboards and provide a timely reference for a rapidly expanding class of tools that increasingly mediate clinical decisions and quality improvement. The authors have defined 4 pillars of design with associated practices, establishing a practical approach to the thoughtful development of useful dashboards. Building on these pillars, this commentary proposes accountable dashboarding, defined as making explicit the causal chain linking data sources and governance to visualization, interpretation, action, and measurable outcomes. Dashboards could be treated as sociotechnical interventions in which upstream choices are inseparable from the user interface and downstream decision-making. Evaluation should extend beyond usability and satisfaction to include decision quality and behavioral proxies, unintended consequences, and patient-centered outcomes of dashboard-informed interventions.

Background: Wearable devices are increasingly adopted for personal health monitoring, but evidence on their long-term associations with health-related lifestyle behaviors in real-world population settings remains limited. Objective: This study examined the longitudinal association between wearable device adoption and engagement in health-related lifestyle behaviors using a nationally representative panel dataset from South Korea. Methods: We analyzed data from the 2016 and 2022 waves of the Korea Media Panel survey. Health-related lifestyle behaviors in the physical, social, and cultural domains were operationalized as estimated annual activity counts based on self-reported frequency measures. We used a difference-in-differences framework with generalized estimating equations to compare changes in these behaviors between new wearable adopters and nonadopters adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Relative changes were estimated using Poisson models with a log link, and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore variation across sociodemographic groups. As a sensitivity analysis, inverse probability of treatment weighting was additionally applied to assess the robustness of the findings to observed baseline imbalance. Results: Wearable device adoption was associated with greater increases in total, physical, and cultural health-related lifestyle activities over time. In the difference-in-differences model, adopters showed greater relative increases in total activity (rate ratio [RR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.35), physical activity (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.64), and cultural activity (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.31-2.42) than nonadopters. Subgroup analyses showed limited evidence of consistent heterogeneity and should be interpreted cautiously. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability of treatment weighting showed overall patterns broadly similar to those of the primary analyses. Conclusions: In this nationally representative panel study, wearable device adoption was associated with greater increases in total, physical, and cultural health-related lifestyle activities over time, whereas no clear association was observed for social activity. These findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal given the observational design and the inability to directly assess parallel trends.

Background: As oncology workflows integrate increasingly autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) agents, health systems face uncertainty regarding operational impacts. Traditional linear forecasting methods fail to capture second-order effects such as governance saturation, induced demand, and bottleneck migration. To navigate this complexity, the emerging field of medical futures studies requires methodologies that bridge qualitative strategic foresight with quantitative operational modeling. These system-level dynamics directly influence timely diagnosis, treatment delays, and overall health system resilience. Objective: This study aimed to develop a proof-of-concept framework coupling qualitative scenario planning with computational discrete-event simulation to stress-test oncology AI adoption strategies. Methods: We defined a strategic state space using 2 orthogonal axes, AI automation intensity and data interoperability, resulting in 4 distinct futures scenarios. We translated these qualitative narratives into a quantitative discrete-event simulation model of a 3-year operational horizon. The model quantified system performance (referral-to-treatment interval [RTTI] and throughput), volatility, and resource constraints across different adoption trajectories. Results: The scenario-planning phase yielded 4 operational archetypes (analog oncology, automation islands, interconnected clinicians, and AI-orchestrated care) with distinct constraints, risks, and failure modes. In the simulation, the fully integrated scenario maximized capacity (1244, SD 21.4 patients per year) and halved the mean RTTI to 14.9 (SD 0.3) days, a magnitude comparable to major pathway redesign interventions. Isolated automation without data infrastructure led to reduced system performance, increasing RTTI by 26% (37.1, SD 1.3 days) and reducing throughput to 647 (SD 10.1) patients per year due to administrative governance saturation. The model illustrated a structural bottleneck migration: successful upstream AI adoption shifted binding constraints from diagnostic scanners to downstream chemotherapy infusion units, whereas missing data interoperability resulted in governance constraints. Pathway optimization analysis indicated that a coordinated strategy prioritizing early improvements in data interoperability reduced transition volatility compared to an automation-first approach. Conclusions: Integrating qualitative scenario planning with quantitative simulations enabled a systematic evaluation of oncology AI adoption strategies. As a proof of concept, it offers a replicable framework for health leaders to model future scenarios of digital transformation in times of high uncertainty. Subsequent work should expand this methodology to incorporate financial and health equity dimensions, establishing simulation-based scenario planning as an important tool in medical futures studies.

This commentary reviews the study by Jones et al, which evaluated whether GPT-4 could improve the readability of injectable medication guidelines while preserving important safety information. The study found that GPT-4 produced modest readability gains comparable to manual revision, but also introduced omissions and meaning changes in a minority of sections. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of early large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts. However, this study reflects the capabilities of a specific model in a rapidly evolving domain. Since the release of GPT-4, advances in multistep reasoning, model-critique workflows, and structured validation have substantially improved the ability of newer systems to detect omissions, maintain factual fidelity, and support controlled editing. As a result, some documented limitations may stem from the constraints of a single-model, single-pass workflow rather than intrinsic flaws in LLM-assisted guideline revision. This commentary highlights the need for evaluation frameworks that can keep pace with LLM progress and emphasizes that clinical oversight and user-centered testing remain essential. Updated research using contemporary models is needed to determine how emerging architectures can more safely support clarity, consistency, and maintenance of clinical guidelines.

Background: Statin therapy, despite proven cardiovascular benefits, remains underused. Social media platforms may capture patient perspectives that are less visible in clinical encounters. Objective: This study aimed to characterize themes, sentiment, and decision-making factors related to statin therapy through large language model (LLM)–based analysis of Reddit discussions. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study analyzed English-language Reddit posts and comments mentioning statins from January 2022 to May 2025, identified via keyword-based Reddit application programming interface searches (≤1000 posts per keyword). A total of 5328 retrieved discussions (n=1661, 31.2% posts and n=3667, 68.8% keyword-containing comments) from public subreddits were included. Themes, sentiments (positive, neutral, or negative), guideline-informed clinical relevance, information-seeking behavior, adverse effect mentions, decision factors, and adherence-related content were extracted using an LLM-based pipeline. Results: Among 5328 discussions, prominent topics included adverse effects (n=1697, 31.9%), decision-making references related to laboratory results and physician advice (n=2767, 51.9% and n=2034, 38.2%, respectively), and alternative approaches (n=2485, 46.6%). Overall sentiment was neutral in 34% (n=1812) of discussions, negative in 30.9% (n=1646), and positive in 16.9% (n=900); the remainder were mixed or unclear. Statin-directed sentiment was neutral in 44.1% (n=2350) of discussions, negative in 25.2% (n=1343), and positive in 12.5% (n=666); the remainder did not express statin-directed sentiment. High clinical relevance was identified in 12.6% (n=672) of discussions. Adherence-related issues were mentioned in 29.8% (n=1587) of discussions. Among adverse effect mentions, muscle pain (n=129, 7.6%) and fatigue (n=110, 6.5%) were common. Conclusions: LLM-enabled analysis of Reddit discourse highlights substantial negative sentiment, adherence-related concerns, and adverse effect narratives surrounding statin therapy. These findings suggest opportunities for patient-centered communication and shared decision-making strategies that address symptom attribution, uncertainty, and information needs in digital information environments.

Background: Digital sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection (STBBIs) testing services are used to improve testing access, but might replicate existing social inequities. Previous research has shown that the digital STBBI testing service has improved access to testing in British Columbia (BC), Canada. As part of the program’s continuous evaluation, we examined awareness and use of the service in 5 urban, suburban, and rural communities where the program has expanded. Objective: This study aimed to determine if social location is associated with differences in awareness and use of the service in 5 communities outside Vancouver, BC. Methods: From July to September 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey recruiting (in-person and online) sexually active people aged 16 years or older in 5 urban, suburban, and rural communities where had sample collection sites available at the time. We examined differences in awareness and use by age, gender identity, sexual identity, race/ethnicity, education, and income using logistic regression models informed by the Health Equity Measurement Framework. Results: Of the 1658 participants (n=1058, 63.8% in-person and n=600, 36.2% online), 35.3% (586/1658) were aware of and 19.5% (324/1658) had used it. Awareness and use were lower in the first and last age quartiles compared to the second quartile (>38 years: awareness odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% CI 0.17‐0.32; use OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.12‐0.28;

Background: Automated structuring of radiology reports is essential for data utilization and the development of medical artificial intelligence models. However, manual annotation by experts is labor-intensive, and processing real clinical data through commercial large language models (LLMs) presents significant privacy risks. These challenges are particularly pronounced for non-English languages like Japanese, where specialized medical corpora are scarce. While synthetic data generation offers a potential privacy-preserving alternative, its effectiveness in capturing complex clinical nuances—such as negation and contextual dependencies—to train robust classification models without any real-world training data has not been fully established. Objective: This study aimed to develop a context-aware sentence classification model for Japanese radiology reports using an entirely synthetic training pipeline, thereby eliminating reliance on real-world clinical data during the development phase. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate the generalizability of this approach by validating the model’s performance on diverse, multi-institutional, real-world reports. Methods: Japanese radiology reports (n=3104) were generated using GPT-4.1 and automatically annotated at the sentence level into 4 categories (background, positive finding, negative finding, and continuation) using GPT-4.1-mini. The synthetic data were partitioned into training (n=2670), validation (n=334), and test (n=100) sets. We fine-tuned several models, including lightweight local LLMs (Qwen3 and Llama 3.2 series) using low-rank adaptation and Japanese text classification models (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT]-base Japanese v3, Japanese Medical Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach [JMedRoBERTa]-base, and ModernBERT-Ja-130M). External validation was performed using 280 real-world reports (3477 sentences) from 7 institutions in the Japan Medical Image Database, with ground-truth labels established by board-certified radiologists. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, macro-averaged (macro ) score, and positive predictive value for positive findings (PPV_1). Results: All models achieved high performance on the synthetic test set (accuracy: 0.938‐0.951; macro -score: 0.924‐0.940). Overall performance declined on the external validation dataset (accuracy: 0.783‐0.813; macro -score: 0.761‐0.790), reflecting distributional differences between synthetic and real-world reports; however, PPV_1 remained stable and high across datasets (eg, 0.957 on the synthetic test set vs 0.952 on the external validation dataset for Qwen3 [4B]). Parsing errors occurred in LLM-based approaches (19‐260 sentences, 0.55%‐7.48% in the external dataset). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing context-aware sentence classification models for Japanese radiology reports using a training pipeline based entirely on synthetic data. The stability of PPV_1 indicates that the models successfully captured the essential clinical terminology and linguistic patterns required to identify positive findings in real-world reports, despite the observed performance degradation during external validation. This approach substantially reduces manual annotation requirements and privacy risks, providing a scalable foundation for constructing structured radiology datasets to support the development of clinically relevant medical artificial intelligence models.

Background: Preventing relapses of psychosis is difficult and important. Digital remote monitoring (DRM) systems are being developed and tested to support this. Increasingly, these systems use algorithm-based relapse prediction. Hence, understanding stakeholder views about algorithmic prediction is crucial. Existing qualitative work has explored health professionals’ views, but very few studies have examined the perspectives of people with psychosis on this topic. Objective: This paper aimed to provide an in-depth examination of the views of people with psychosis regarding algorithmic relapse prediction within a DRM system that incorporates active symptom monitoring and passive sensing data. Methods: People with psychosis (n=58) were recruited from 6 geographically distinct areas of the United Kingdom. They participated in semistructured qualitative interviews exploring their views about using a DRM system that predicts psychosis relapse based on a machine learning algorithm. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. People with lived experience of psychosis were involved extensively in study design, analysis, and reporting. Results: Findings were described across 4 themes. First, was a prominent theme. Participants emphasized that transparency about algorithm sensitivity and specificity is crucial and discussed the risks of the relapse prediction algorithm producing false positives (flagging that someone was relapsing when they were not) and false negatives (missing actual relapses). In both cases, participants said that errors may be partially mitigated through a approach (theme 2), with DRM blended with human oversight, from clinicians or a dedicated digital monitoring team, and calibrated based on service user, carer, and clinician feedback. The third theme, noted the interplay between users’ trust in the DRM system and their relationship with the clinical team. This theme described participants’ fears about potential overreactions (hospitalization or excessive medication) or underreactions (no additional support) from the clinical team in response to algorithm-generated relapse predictions. It emphasized the importance of retaining choice around the use of relapse detection algorithms and the sharing of personal data. The final theme described participants’ views about the , including facilitating early intervention, triaging care according to need, minimizing human bias in assessment, and efficiency in saving staff time. Conclusions: People with psychosis acknowledged potential benefits of algorithm-assisted relapse prediction for receiving timely or efficient care, but with several caveats. Algorithm-generated relapse alerts need to be sufficiently accurate and must be interpreted, with understanding of their limitations, by a trustworthy human who is aware of the relevant context. Algorithm-based relapse predictions should only be used with valid consent, in a way that promotes and respects the autonomy and voice of service users and avoids increasing the use of excessive restriction.

Background: The World Health Organization recommends that countries routinely collect data on the behavioral and social drivers (BeSD) of vaccination to inform public health interventions that increase vaccine uptake. There is a need to identify data collection methods that can rapidly and inexpensively collect representative data, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: This study aimed to understand BeSD drivers of vaccination in the Philippines and assess the trade-offs between survey methods. We compared responses to household, mobile, and online surveys in terms of demographics, vaccination status, responses to BeSD questions, and cost. Methods: We conducted concurrent household, mobile (SMS text messaging and interactive voice response), and online surveys among caregivers of children 2 years of age and below in Regions V and XII of the Philippines, with sampling differing by survey method. We assessed, for each survey method, (1) respondent demographics (sex, age, region, and socioeconomic status) and (2) the weighted proportion of responses from caregivers of children who received at least one dose of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT)–containing vaccine. We estimated the weighted proportion of each BeSD survey response option and calculated the financial cost (monetary outlays) per survey response from an implementer’s perspective by summing the costs incurred in each survey method and dividing by the number of responses received. Results: We surveyed a total of 1201 household respondents, 2153 mobile respondents, and 398 online respondents from January to March 2025. We found that online and mobile survey respondents were more likely to be male and have completed high school than household survey respondents. The weighted proportion of respondents indicating that their child had received at least one dose of DPT vaccine was 91.8% (n=1090; 95% CI 90%‐93.3%) for the household survey, 90.3% (n=1853) for the mobile survey, and 85% (n=346) for the online survey. With regard to vaccine demand, more than 85% of respondents in each survey method indicated that vaccines are very important, very safe, supported by family, and that they knew where to bring a child for vaccination. More than 30% of mobile and online survey respondents indicated that it was not easy to pay for vaccination. The financial cost to conduct the survey per survey response was US $2.61 for the online survey, US $6.93 for the mobile survey, and US $29.38 for the household survey. Conclusions: In the Philippines, household, mobile, and online survey methods reached caregivers of children who were unvaccinated against DPT, and these proportions were similar across survey methods. BeSD responses indicated high vaccine demand and challenges in caregivers’ cost to access vaccination. Determining the most appropriate survey method depends on trade-offs between representativeness and costs. However, areas with strong connectivity and high mobile device ownership can consider mobile and online methods as a lower-cost alternative to rapidly collect BeSD data.

Background: The rapid expansion of rehabilitation needs in China has intensified pressure on a workforce that remains unevenly distributed. Digital health technologies (DHTs) offer potential to increase service reach and efficiency. However, little is known about how rehabilitation professionals currently gather and document clinical information, nor about their readiness to integrate digital tools into routine practice within China’s rapidly digitalizing health system. Objective: This study aimed to describe how rehabilitation professionals in China collect subjective and objective clinical information, document patient data in routine practice, and assess their willingness to use DHTs in clinical settings. Methods: We conducted a multi-province observational cross-sectional survey using a culturally adapted questionnaire based on the World Health Organization Digital Health Interventions framework. The instrument assessed participant characteristics, information collection methods, documentation practices, and willingness to adopt digital functions across rehabilitation activities. Descriptive analyses and subgroup comparisons were performed on 324 complete responses from certified rehabilitation professionals. The multi-province cross-sectional online survey was conducted among licensed rehabilitation professionals in China with internet access. Participants were recruited through professional networks and social media platforms. Results: Respondents were drawn from 20 provincial-level administrative regions across China, including Fujian (n=72), Guangdong (n=77), and Shanxi (n=45), among others, with 82.7% (268/324) employed in public sector rehabilitation services. Traditional methods dominated clinical work. Face-to-face communication was used frequently for subjective assessment by 96.3% (312/324) of respondents, whereas digital channels such as email (22/324, 6.8%) and telephone (47/324, 14.5%) saw limited use. For objective information, visual observation (271/324, 83.7%) and manual measurement tools (195/324, 60.2%) remained the primary approaches, while motion capture technology (45/324, 13.8%) and wearable sensors (13/324, 4%) were rarely used. Documentation practices also relied heavily on analogue formats, with 82.1% (266/324) using handwritten notes and 60.2% (195/324) using paper templates. In contrast, willingness to adopt DHTs was consistently high, with 80.6% (261/324) of respondents indicating readiness to use digital systems for identity verification, 79.0% (256/324) for progress tracking, and 78.1% (253/324) for outcome measurement. Subgroup analyses revealed that educational level significantly influenced the adoption of advanced technologies, with master’s or doctoral degree holders reporting higher use of sensor-based assessment, motion capture, and wearable devices. In contrast, professional title and clinical specialty showed limited influence, with no significant differences observed for most digital health functions. Conclusions: Rehabilitation professionals in China demonstrate strong readiness to use DHTs, yet their routine practice remains largely paper-based and analogue. These findings provide evidence to inform implementation strategies, workforce training, and system-level planning aimed at accelerating digital transformation in rehabilitation services.

Background: Meditation has grown in popularity in recent years, but many people who try meditation often fail to establish a habit. Goal setting has been demonstrated to be an effective technique in behavior change in other health-related contexts but is understudied in the meditation context. Objective: This study had 2 objectives: (1) to assess the association between goal setting and the number of days people meditated and (2) to evaluate whether anchoring bias in the goal-setting question (via response option order) influences goal selection and subsequent meditation behavior. Methods: This large-scale quasi-experimental field study included 18,559 Spotify mobile users aged 18 years or older residing in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, or the United States who had listened to at least 5 minutes of meditation content from a specified teacher. The in-app experiment consisted of 2 goal-setting test conditions and an active control. In the test conditions, participants selected the number of days they intended to listen to content from the meditation teacher in the next 7 days. The conditions differed only in the order of goal response options (higher goals listed first vs last). The active control rated how much they liked the teacher but did not set a goal. Because responding was optional, selection bias is possible, and the design is quasi-experimental. Results: The act of setting any goal had a modest positive association with the number of days people meditated in both treatment condition 1 (=.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.16) and treatment condition 2 (=.08, 95% CI 0.002-0.15). People who committed to higher goals were also more likely to meditate more than those who committed to lower goals. Additionally, the distribution of goals between the treatment conditions varied (=84.24;

Background: Deaf individuals often face communication challenges when interacting with those who can hear. Within health care settings, these challenges may pose risks to their safety, potentially resulting in misdiagnoses, treatment errors, and decreased quality of care. Objective: This study aims to systematically review the evidence on communication systems reported in the literature that use human-computer interaction techniques to support communication between deaf individuals who use sign language and hearing health professionals in health care settings. The review focuses on systems that are either currently in use or proposed for use in health care and that have been tested using human participants or videos of human users. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed via MEDLINE, Web of Science, ACM, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Google Scholar in March 2025. The inclusion criteria comprised studies developing a sign language recognition system within a health care context and testing with human users. Eligible studies underwent screening by 2 independent investigators (LRV and LMMSR or LFRdO and GTdSS), with any disagreements resolved by a senior researcher (MSM). Results: The search retrieved 21,778 publications, and screening of reference lists identified 2 additional studies, resulting in a total of 23 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Most systems (15/23, 65.2%) were image-based, while 34.8% (8/23) relied on sensors (glove-based or depth-sensing). Applications varied across health care settings, including general hospital care (10/23, 43.5%), emergencies (8/23, 34.8%), and primary care (4/23, 17.4%). All systems were in the development and testing stage, with no data on security and psychological impacts. Accuracy ranged from 25% to 100% for image-based and 72% to 99.7% for sensor-based systems. Bidirectionality and facial expression recognition, crucial for effective communication, were largely overlooked. Conclusions: Image-based systems were more common than sensor-based ones, though both showed wide variability in accuracy in recognizing and interpreting signs. Most systems failed to address critical aspects such as bidirectional communication and the recognition of facial expressions, essential for effective communication. None fully addresses the requirements for integration into health care settings. These findings highlight the need for further research on implementation, usability, and impact on the quality of care for deaf patients. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/55427

Background: Recurrent outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A (H5N1) virus in farmed poultry, and reports of infections in dairy cattle herds in the United States since March 2024, have triggered concerns about the spillover threat to human populations and a subsequent influenza pandemic. The increasing threat that H5N1 poses to human health has led to more vigilant public health monitoring of these developments. In addition to intensifying surveillance, preventative strategies—like vaccinating those at higher risk—are being evaluated to help minimize infection and spread. Objective: Efforts to mitigate and respond to such an event will entail broad public health interventions including vaccination. However, analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that information quality can significantly impact the effectiveness of such measures by influencing public understanding and trust. Misinformation about H5N1 and other viruses circulating online often includes inaccurate information about transmission, prevention, and the severity of the viruses. By systematically analyzing these false narratives, public health authorities can better tailor their pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response strategies. Methods: In light of the emerging threat of H5N1, we analyzed the content of social media posts from Facebook (approximately 350,000) and Instagram (n=69,551) related to HPAI. Using 40 keywords associated with misinformation, we identified over 500 posts explicitly mentioning H5N1 and related terms for further systematic analysis. Posts were coded to identify targets and topics in the social media narratives. The “target” refers to the organization or person mentioned in the post, while the “topic” refers to the primary issue or subject being addressed. Results: Our content analysis identifies 7 main targets of misinformation, including government (149/544, 27%), health authorities (108/544, 20%), and international organizations (74/544, 14%). Also, from the 6 topics that have been identified, we found that the most widespread one was that authority figures purposefully engineer pandemics to achieve multiple political, economic, and other objectives (362/544, 67%) followed by societal destruction (121/544, 22%), and anti-vaccination (84/544, 15%). Other themes include societal destruction and religious allusions and prophecies. Conclusions: Our analysis of online content showed that H5N1 misinformation was primarily aimed at individuals or groups with differing degrees of political or institutional authority, such as government leaders and public health officials. These figures were often the focus due to their involvement in making health policy decisions and implementing public health measures. Decision-making entities and individuals were the target of various misinformation narratives. Results demonstrate the ongoing need for monitoring health misinformation to inform evolving public health responses to HPAI.