❌

Normal view

  • ✇Nature Cancer
  • A functional map of m<sup>6</sup>A sites in cancer Yalong Wang · Han Xu
    Nature Cancer, Published online: 13 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-026-01137-yRNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal RNA modification, yet its functional landscape in cancer remains poorly defined. A study now introduces a METTL3-based RNA base-editing screen that maps functional m6A sites and reveals m6A-dependent translational activation of the tumor suppressor CHD9 in prostate cancer and beyond.
     

A functional map of m<sup>6</sup>A sites in cancer

13 March 2026 at 08:00

Nature Cancer, Published online: 13 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-026-01137-y

RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal RNA modification, yet its functional landscape in cancer remains poorly defined. A study now introduces a METTL3-based RNA base-editing screen that maps functional m6A sites and reveals m6A-dependent translational activation of the tumor suppressor CHD9 in prostate cancer and beyond.

The genomic model P-CARE enables precision prostate cancer screening in a national healthcare system

13 March 2026 at 08:00

Nature Cancer, Published online: 13 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-025-01111-0

We developed and clinically implemented the genomic prostate cancer risk prediction model P-CARE that identifies men at a high or low risk of prostate cancer. P-CARE enabled the design and initiation of a precision screening trial across the national healthcare system in which it was developed.
  • ✇Nature Cancer
  • AI for breast cancer screening Allan Hackshaw · Rosalind Given-Wilson
    Nature Cancer, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-025-01109-8Whether support from artificial intelligence (AI) models improves breast screening is a topic of research in national cancer screening programmes and clinical oncology. Three studies now show that AI tools can assist radiologists with evaluating mammograms, substantially reducing workloads and possibly improving screening performance.
     

AI for breast cancer screening

10 March 2026 at 08:00

Nature Cancer, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-025-01109-8

Whether support from artificial intelligence (AI) models improves breast screening is a topic of research in national cancer screening programmes and clinical oncology. Three studies now show that AI tools can assist radiologists with evaluating mammograms, substantially reducing workloads and possibly improving screening performance.

Impact of using artificial intelligence as a second reader in breast screening including arbitration

Nature Cancer, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-026-01128-z

Warren et al. used data from a retrospective cohort of 50,000 women attending breast screening. Arbitration between human and AI decisions was performed in a reader study following normal arbitration workflow. After arbitration, replacing the second human reader with AI in a double-read breast screening workflow was noninferior to two human readers.

Prospective evaluation of artificial intelligence integration into breast cancer screening in multiple workflow settings: the GEMINI study

Nature Cancer, Published online: 10 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-026-01126-1

De Vries et al. performed prospective evaluation of AI for breast cancer screening leveraged in many different workflow settings and report several clinical and operational gains depending on the type of AI integration.

CRTAM inhibition mitigates toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors without antitumor efficacy trade-off

Nature Cancer, Published online: 05 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s43018-026-01135-0

Dong and colleagues report that blockade of T cell-expressed cytotoxic and regulatory T cell molecule results in selective mitigation of immune-related toxicities without affecting antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
❌