arXiv:2609.09848v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic data releases are increasingly proposed in the literature as a means of sharing realistic data replicas in lieu of sensitive private datasets. Even when the worst-case privacy leakage of such releases is bounded by means of differential privacy (DP), in practice a residual risk remains. Membership inference attack (MIA) audits are conducted to empirically quantify this risk. However, existing methods only measure average-case risk for randomly drawn records, which might conceal the risk to vulnerable subgroups. To highlight this issue, we define a subgroup-targeted membership inference game in which the target pool is an explicit parameter, and instantiate it with an audit of 32 proxies under three scenarios with different levels of attacker knowledge, across four datasets, three generators (DP-SGD fine-tuning, API-based prompting, and activation steering), and five privacy budgets. The audit shows that synthetic releases leak subgroup membership and that prior attacks systematically underestimate this leakage. DP is effective at the aggregate level: it substantially reduces average leakage at every budget we test. Three observations temper this picture. First, the remaining leakage is concentrated rather than spread out: under DP, a tenth of the records carries roughly 40% of it. Second, the protection DP delivers in practice is uneven: within its worst-case guarantee, the noise removes more of the measured leakage from random records than from high-risk ones---and a merged-pool audit that scores both record types against shared negatives confirms this at the record level. Third, \emph{which} records leak proves to be a property of the release mechanism rather than of the record alone, so record-level risk cannot be assessed independently of the release.

arXiv:2603.09943v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Computational pathology demands both visual pattern recognition and dynamic integration of structured domain knowledge, including taxonomy, grading criteria, and clinical evidence. In practice, diagnostic reasoning requires linking morphological evidence with formal diagnostic and grading criteria. Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demonstrate strong vision language reasoning capabilities, they lack explicit mechanisms for structured knowledge integration and interpretable memory control. As a result, existing models struggle to consistently incorporate pathology-specific diagnostic standards during reasoning. Inspired by the hierarchical memory process of human pathologists, we propose PathMem, a memory-centric multimodal framework for pathology MLLMs. PathMem organizes structured pathology knowledge as a long-term memory (LTM) and introduces a Memory Transformer that models the dynamic transition from LTM to working memory (WM) through multimodal memory activation and context-aware knowledge grounding, enabling context-aware memory refinement for downstream reasoning. PathMem achieves SOTA performance across benchmarks, improving WSI-Bench report generation (12.8% WSI-Precision, 10.1% WSI-Relevance) and open-ended diagnosis by 9.7% and 8.9% over prior WSI-based models.