arXiv:2609.12304v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Wrist-worn IMU has been widely used for daily-life health monitoring. Yet, it does not fully represent whole-body dynamics, for which the body center of mass (COM) is considered the physiological reference standard. Therefore, this work proposes a simplified kinematic model (KM), which is designed to map the wrist IMU to the COM acceleration. It is built upon several reductive assumptions that enable the solvability of the dynamic equations based on wrist IMU measurements alone. This work further proposes three types of hybrid AI modeling methods, namely human kinematic model-based neural network (HKM-NN) models, to leverage the power of both grey-box and black-box modeling. The HKM-NN methods include serial learning (ser-) and two approaches of simultaneous learning (sim1- and sim2-). The proposed models are trained and tested using our dataset, which includes wrist IMU measurements and ground-truth COM measurements from 10 healthy volunteers during six gait activities and sit-to-stand (SS) transitional movement. The results demonstrate the feasibility of estimating COM acceleration from wrist IMU measurements. Our KM model yields satisfactory results, with an error ranging from 6.7% to 12.5% for gait activities and 5.6% for the SS. In comparison with the KM model, our HKM-NN models significantly enhance the performance, achieving 5.3% to 9.3% errors for gait activities, and the best error of 3.9% for the SS. In addition, the HKM-NN models demonstrate distinct robustness characteristics under noisy test conditions, with sim1-/sim2- generally maintaining greater robustness under Gaussian perturbations, while the KM model exhibits comparatively strong robustness under salt-and-pepper noise. These findings highlight the importance of combining biomechanical structure with data-driven learning for wearable sensing applications operating under imperfect and noisy measurement conditions.

arXiv:2605.25246v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for optimization modeling and solver-code generation, yet practical operations research and optimization problems often require a harder capability: designing scalable algorithms that exploit problem structure and outperform direct formulation-and-solve baselines. Existing benchmarks are limited to small or simplified examples far below real-world scale and complexity. We introduce FrontierOR, among the first benchmarks to systematically evaluate LLM-based efficient algorithm design for realistic large-scale optimization problems. FrontierOR includes 180 tasks derived from methodologically diverse papers published in top-tier operations research venues, each with standardized instances and a hidden, expert-verified evaluation suite. We evaluate seven LLMs spanning frontier, cost-effective, and open-source models both in one-shot and test-time evolution settings. The results reveal that frontier models still struggle to move from executable formulations to efficient optimization algorithms: the strongest one-shot model outperforms Gurobi in only 31% of cases in both solution quality and computational efficiency, and even strong coding agents with test-time evolution achieve only 50% on selected hard tasks. FrontierOR establishes a practical evaluation platform for LLM-based optimization algorithm design, which enables future LLMs and agents to be systematically tested on whether they can move beyond correct formulation toward a feasible, high-quality, and efficient algorithm.

arXiv:2602.10635v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Socially intelligent AI systems must entail reasoning across diverse human behavioral tasks, and generalization to new contexts. However, AI has yet to achieve this level of social intelligence. Existing models remain fundamentally constrained by the imbalanced learning dynamics induced by training on behavioral data. Namely, behavioral data is inherently heterogeneous, comprising diverse modalities and prediction targets that often produce uneven training signals across samples. To address this, we develop Omnisapiens-7B 2.0, a foundation model for social behavior processing that explicitly addresses learning from heterogeneous behavioral data. This is enabled through Heterogeneity-Aware Relative Policy Optimization, a novel reasoning RL method that explicitly rebalances learning signals across samples. The core insight is to approximate contribution signals to the policy update, using them to inform geometrically centered and intertially smoothed advantage modulation. Results demonstrate that Omnisapiens-7B 2.0 achieves the best and most consistent performance across 10 diverse behavioral tasks, while also attaining the best performance on all five held-out zero-shot generalization benchmarks, with gains of up to +12.02% and +9.37% respectively. Furthermore, Omnisapiens-7B 2.0 demonstrates more consistent and interpretable reasoning traces, supporting reliable real-world behavioral applications. Our model and codes can be found at https://github.com/MIT-MI/human_behavior_atlas.

arXiv:2512.04733v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: End-to-end autonomous driving (AD) systems increasingly adopt vision-language-action (VLA) models, yet they typically ignore the passenger's emotional state, which is central to comfort and AD acceptance. We introduce Open-Domain End-to-End (OD-E2E) autonomous driving, where an autonomous vehicle (AV) must interpret free-form natural-language commands, infer the emotion, and plan a physically feasible trajectory. We propose E3AD, an emotion-aware VLA framework that augments semantic understanding with two cognitively inspired components: a continuous Valenc-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) emotion model that captures tone and urgency from language, and a dual-pathway spatial reasoning module that fuses egocentric and allocentric views for human-like spatial cognition. A consistency-oriented training scheme, combining modality pretraining with preference-based alignment, further enforces coherence between emotional intent and driving actions. Across real-world datasets, E3AD improves visual grounding and waypoint planning and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) VAD correlation for emotion estimation. These evaluation results show that injecting emotion into VLA-style driving yields more human-aligned grounding, planning, and feedback.

arXiv:2604.04898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Proprietary AI systems have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities on complex proof-based problems, with gold-level performance reported at the 2025 International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO). However, the training pipelines behind these systems remain largely undisclosed, and their reliance on large "internal" models and scaffolds makes them expensive to run, difficult to reproduce, and hard to study or improve upon. This raises a central question: can small, open models also be trained to achieve competitive reasoning performance on difficult Olympiad-level math? In this paper, we answer this question by building QED-Nano, a 4B model post-trained for Olympiad-level proofs. Our training recipe has three stages: (1) supervised fine-tuning to imbue good proof-writing styles by distilling from DeepSeek-Math-V2, (2) reinforcement learning (RL) with rubric-based rewards, and (3) expanding RL with a reasoning cache, which decomposes long proofs into iterative summarize-and-refine cycles and enables stronger test-time reasoning. QED-Nano surpasses the proof-generation performance of much larger open models, including Nomos-1 and GPT-OSS-120B, and approaches the performance of proprietary models like Gemini 3 Pro, at a fraction of the inference cost. To support further research on open mathematical reasoning, we release the full QED-Nano pipeline, including the QED-Nano and QED-Nano-SFT models, the FineProofs-SFT and FineProofs-RL datasets, and the training and evaluation code.

arXiv:2604.01658v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based evolution is a promising approach for open-ended discovery, where progress requires sustained search and knowledge accumulation. Existing methods still rely heavily on fixed heuristics and hard-coded exploration rules, which limit the autonomy of LLM agents. We present CORAL, the first framework for autonomous multi-agent evolution on open-ended problems. CORAL replaces rigid control with long-running agents that explore, reflect, and collaborate through shared persistent memory, asynchronous multi-agent execution, and heartbeat-based interventions. It also provides practical safeguards, including isolated workspaces, evaluator separation, resource management, and agent session and health management. Evaluated on diverse mathematical, algorithmic, and systems optimization tasks, CORAL sets new state-of-the-art results on 10 tasks, achieving 3-10 times higher improvement rates with far fewer evaluations than fixed evolutionary search baselines across tasks. On Anthropic's kernel engineering task, four co-evolving agents improve the best known score from 1363 to 1103 cycles. Mechanistic analyses further show how these gains arise from knowledge reuse and multi-agent exploration and communication. Together, these results suggest that greater agent autonomy and multi-agent evolution can substantially improve open-ended discovery. Code is available at https://github.com/Human-Agent-Society/CORAL.

arXiv:2509.07430v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A central paradox in fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) is the frequent degradation of multi-attempt performance (Pass@k) despite improvements in single-attempt accuracy (Pass@1). This is often accompanied by catastrophic forgetting, where models lose previously acquired skills. While various methods have been proposed, the choice and function of the divergence term have been surprisingly unexamined as a proactive solution. We argue that standard RLVR objectives -- both those using the mode-seeking reverse KL-divergence and those forgoing a divergence term entirely -- lack a crucial mechanism for knowledge retention. The reverse-KL actively accelerates this decay by narrowing the policy, while its absence provides no safeguard against the model drifting from its diverse knowledge base. We propose a fundamental shift in perspective: using the divergence term itself as the solution. Our framework, Diversity-Preserving Hybrid RL (DPH-RL), leverages mass-covering f-divergences (like forward-KL and JS-divergence) to function as a rehearsal mechanism. By continuously referencing the initial policy, this approach forces the model to maintain broad solution coverage. Extensive experiments on math and SQL generation demonstrate that DPH-RL not only resolves the Pass@k degradation but improves both Pass@1 and Pass@k in- and out-of-domain. Additionally, DPH-RL is more training-efficient because it computes f-divergence using generator functions, requiring only sampling from the initial policy and no online reference model. Our work highlights a crucial, overlooked axis for improving RLVR, demonstrating that the proper selection of a divergence measure is a powerful tool for building more general and diverse reasoning models.

arXiv:2510.18428v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Optimization modeling underlies critical decision-making across industries, yet remains difficult to automate: natural-language problem descriptions must be translated into precise mathematical formulations and executable solver code. Existing LLM-based approaches typically rely on brittle prompting or costly retraining, both of which offer limited generalization. Recent work suggests that large models can improve via experience reuse, but how to systematically acquire, refine, and reuse such experience in structurally constrained settings remains unclear. We present \textbf{AlphaOPT}, a self-improving experience library that enables LLMs to learn optimization modeling knowledge from limited supervision, including answer-only feedback without gold-standard programs, annotated reasoning traces, or parameter updates. AlphaOPT operates in a continual two-phase cycle: a \emph{Library Learning} phase that extracts solver-verified, structured insights from failed attempts, and a \emph{Library Evolution} phase that refines the applicability of stored insights based on aggregate evidence across tasks. This design allows the model to accumulate reusable modeling principles, improve transfer across problem instances, and maintain bounded library growth over time. Evaluated on multiple optimization benchmarks, AlphaOPT steadily improves as more training data become available (65\% $\rightarrow$ 72\% from 100 to 300 training items) and outperforms the strongest baseline by 9.1\% and 8.2\% on two out-of-distribution datasets. These results demonstrate that structured experience learning, grounded in solver feedback, provides a practical alternative to retraining for complex reasoning tasks requiring precise formulation and execution. All code and data are available at: https://github.com/Minw913/AlphaOPT.