arXiv:2604.00513v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the rapid growth of e-commerce, exploring general representations rather than task-specific ones has attracted increasing attention. Although recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have driven significant progress in product understanding, they are typically employed as feature extractors that implicitly encode product information into global embeddings, thereby limiting their ability to capture fine-grained attributes. Therefore, we argue that leveraging the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs to explicitly model fine-grained product attributes holds significant potential. Nevertheless, achieving this goal remains non-trivial due to several key challenges: (i) long-context reasoning tends to dilute the model's attention to salient information in the raw input; (ii) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) primarily encourages rigid imitation, limiting the exploration of effective reasoning strategies; and (iii) fine-grained details are progressively attenuated during forward propagation. To address these issues, we propose MOON3.0, the first reasoning-aware MLLM-based model for product representation learning. Our method (1) employs a multi-head modality fusion module to adaptively integrate raw signals; (2) incorporates a joint contrastive and reinforcement learning framework to autonomously explore more effective reasoning strategies; and (3) introduces a fine-grained residual enhancement module to progressively preserve local details throughout the network. Additionally, we release a large-scale multimodal e-commerce benchmark MBE3.0. Experimentally, our model demonstrates state-of-the-art zero-shot performance across various downstream tasks on both our benchmark and public datasets.

arXiv:2511.12449v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly advanced e-commerce product understanding. However, they still face three challenges: (i) the modality imbalance induced by modality mixed training; (ii) underutilization of the intrinsic alignment relationships among visual and textual information within a product; and (iii) limited handling of noise in e-commerce multimodal data. To address these, we propose MOON2.0, a dynamic modality-balanced MultimOdal representation learning framework for e-commerce prOduct uNderstanding. It comprises: (1) a Modality-driven Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) that adaptively processes input samples by their modality composition, enabling Multimodal Joint Learning to mitigate the modality imbalance; (2) a Dual-level Alignment method to better leverage semantic alignment properties inside individual products; and (3) an MLLM-based Image-text Co-augmentation strategy that integrates textual enrichment with visual expansion, coupled with Dynamic Sample Filtering to improve training data quality. We further release MBE2.0, a co-augmented Multimodal representation Benchmark for E-commerce representation learning and evaluation at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ZHNie/MBE2.0. Experiments show that MOON2.0 delivers state-of-the-art zero-shot performance on MBE2.0 and multiple public datasets. Furthermore, attention-based heatmap visualization provides qualitative evidence of improved multimodal alignment of MOON2.0.

arXiv:2505.07920v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Peer review is a critical component of scientific progress in the fields like AI, but the rapid increase in submission volume has strained the reviewing system, which inevitably leads to reviewer shortages and declines review quality. Besides the growing research popularity, another key factor in this overload is the repeated resubmission of substandard manuscripts, largely due to the lack of effective tools for authors to self-evaluate their work before submission. Large Language Models (LLMs) show great promise in assisting both authors and reviewers, and their performance is fundamentally limited by the quality of the peer review data. However, existing peer review datasets face three major limitations: (1) limited data diversity, (2) inconsistent and low-quality data due to the use of revised rather than initial submissions, and (3) insufficient support for tasks involving rebuttal and reviewer-author interactions. To address these challenges, we introduce the largest consistency-ensured peer review and rebuttal dataset named Re^2, which comprises 19,926 initial submissions, 70,668 review comments, and 53,818 rebuttals from 24 conferences and 21 workshops on OpenReview. Moreover, the rebuttal and discussion stage is framed as a multi-turn conversation paradigm to support both traditional static review tasks and dynamic interactive LLM assistants, providing more practical guidance for authors to refine their manuscripts and helping alleviate the growing review burden. Our data and code are available in https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ReviewBench_anon/.