❌

Normal view

Received β€” 15 September 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

UltraQuant: 4-bit KV Caching for Context-Heavy Agents

arXiv:2606.20474v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Context-heavy agents place substantial pressure on the key-value (KV) cache: long prefixes are reused across many short turns, while concurrency determines whether the serving system can keep GPUs utilized. We study 4-bit KV-cache compression for this setting, using TurboQuant-style rotation and codebook quantization as a quality anchor and vLLM FP8 KV caching as the deployment anchor. We report three contributions. First, we frame 4-bit KV caching around multi-round agent workloads where task quality, cache residency, and serving throughput must be measured jointly. Second, we describe the practical design choices needed to make the 4-bit path robust, including asymmetric K/V treatment, Walsh-Hadamard rotation, QJL removal, and block-scale variants. Third, we present serving optimizations on AMD GPUs, including optimized decode-attention kernels and UltraQuant, an FP4 approximation path that uses FP8 queries, FP4 KV tensors, UE8M0 group scales, and native scaled-MFMA support on CDNA4. On an adaptive-SLO replay of production Claude Code traces, UltraQuant sustains 2.71x (MiniMax-M2.5) and 4.38x (Qwen3-235B) the qualified-request throughput of the BF16 baseline, matching or exceeding hardware FP8 KV while using half the KV bytes. UltraQuant delivers its largest gains in long-context, high-concurrency, memory-constrained serving regimes.
Received β€” 2 April 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

Aligned, Orthogonal or In-conflict: When can we safely optimize Chain-of-Thought?

arXiv:2603.30036v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) monitoring, in which automated systems monitor the CoT of an LLM, is a promising approach for effectively overseeing AI systems. However, the extent to which a model's CoT helps us oversee the model - the monitorability of the CoT - can be affected by training, for instance by the model learning to hide important features of its reasoning. We propose and empirically validate a conceptual framework for predicting when and why this occurs. We model LLM post-training as an RL environment where the reward decomposes into two terms: one term depending on final outputs and another term depending on the CoT. Our framework allows us to classify these two terms as "aligned", "orthogonal", or "in-conflict" before training. We predict that training with in-conflict terms will reduce monitorability, orthogonal terms will not affect it, and aligned terms will improve it. To validate our framework, we use it to classify a set of RL environments, train LLMs within those environments, and evaluate how training affects CoT monitorability. We find that (1) training with "in-conflict" reward terms reduces CoT monitorability and (2) optimizing in-conflict reward terms is difficult.
Received β€” 26 March 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

Why AI-Generated Text Detection Fails: Evidence from Explainable AI Beyond Benchmark Accuracy

arXiv:2603.23146v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made the detection of AI-Generated text a pressing and complex challenge. Although many detection systems report high benchmark accuracy, their reliability in real-world settings remains uncertain, and their interpretability is often unexplored. In this work, we investigate whether contemporary detectors genuinely identify machine authorship or merely exploit dataset-specific artefacts. We propose an interpretable detection framework that integrates linguistic feature engineering, machine learning, and explainable AI techniques. When evaluated on two prominent benchmark corpora, namely PAN CLEF 2025 and COLING 2025, our model trained on 30 linguistic features achieves leaderboard-competitive performance, attaining an F1 score of 0.9734. However, systematic cross-domain and cross-generator evaluation reveals substantial generalisation failure: classifiers that excel in-domain degrade significantly under distribution shift. Using SHAP- based explanations, we show that the most influential features differ markedly between datasets, indicating that detectors often rely on dataset-specific stylistic cues rather than stable signals of machine authorship. Further investigation with in-depth error analysis exposes a fundamental tension in linguistic-feature-based AI text detection: the features that are most discriminative on in-domain data are also the features most susceptible to domain shift, formatting variation, and text-length effects. We believe that this knowledge helps build AI detectors that are robust across different settings. To support replication and practical use, we release an open-source Python package that returns both predictions and instance-level explanations for individual texts.
Received β€” 11 March 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

MediTools -- Medical Education Powered by LLMs

arXiv:2503.22769v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been advancing rapidly and with the advent of large language models (LLMs) in late 2022, numerous opportunities have emerged for adopting this technology across various domains, including medicine. These innovations hold immense potential to revolutionize and modernize medical education. Our research project leverages large language models to enhance medical education and address workflow challenges through the development of MediTools - AI Medical Education. This prototype application focuses on developing interactive tools that simulate real-life clinical scenarios, provide access to medical literature, and keep users updated with the latest medical news. Our first tool is a dermatology case simulation tool that uses real patient images depicting various dermatological conditions and enables interaction with LLMs acting as virtual patients. This platform allows users to practice their diagnostic skills and enhance their clinical decision-making abilities. The application also features two additional tools: an AI-enhanced PubMed tool for engaging with LLMs to gain deeper insights into research papers, and a Google News tool that offers LLM generated summaries of articles for various medical specialties. A comprehensive survey has been conducted among medical professionals and students to gather initial feedback on the effectiveness and user satisfaction of MediTools, providing insights for further development and refinement of the application. This research demonstrates the potential of AI-driven tools in transforming and revolutionizing medical education, offering a scalable and interactive platform for continuous learning and skill development.
Received β€” 25 February 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

IDLM: Inverse-distilled Diffusion Language Models

arXiv:2602.19066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have recently achieved strong results in text generation. However, their multi-step sampling leads to slow inference, limiting practical use. To address this, we extend Inverse Distillation, a technique originally developed to accelerate continuous diffusion models, to the discrete setting. Nonetheless, this extension introduces both theoretical and practical challenges. From a theoretical perspective, the inverse distillation objective lacks uniqueness guarantees, which may lead to suboptimal solutions. From a practical standpoint, backpropagation in the discrete space is non-trivial and often unstable. To overcome these challenges, we first provide a theoretical result demonstrating that our inverse formulation admits a unique solution, thereby ensuring valid optimization. We then introduce gradient-stable relaxations to support effective training. As a result, experiments on multiple DLMs show that our method, Inverse-distilled Diffusion Language Models (IDLM), reduces the number of inference steps by 4x-64x, while preserving the teacher model's entropy and generative perplexity.
❌