❌

Normal view

Received β€” 10 September 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
  • βœ‡cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
  • Meta-RL with Bayesian Linear Task Models Jingyang You Β· Hanna Kurniawati
    arXiv:2512.20974v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep Bayesian reinforcement learning adapts to unseen tasks by inferring latent transition and reward models, but existing methods typically rely on variational posteriors and evidence lower bounds, introducing approximation error and unstable task representations. We introduce GLiBRL, a deep Bayesian RL framework that combines generalised linear task models with learnable non-linear basis functions. GLiBRL features conjugate Bayesian in
     

Meta-RL with Bayesian Linear Task Models

arXiv:2512.20974v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep Bayesian reinforcement learning adapts to unseen tasks by inferring latent transition and reward models, but existing methods typically rely on variational posteriors and evidence lower bounds, introducing approximation error and unstable task representations. We introduce GLiBRL, a deep Bayesian RL framework that combines generalised linear task models with learnable non-linear basis functions. GLiBRL features conjugate Bayesian inference, yielding exact, sequential posterior updates over task parameters and model noise, together with a closed-form marginal likelihood that eliminates variational inference. The update is naturally permutation-invariant, allowing GLiBRL to integrate with both off- and on-policy algorithms. GLiBRL also learns task representation admitting an exact kernel identity, relating distances between task representations to kernel discrepancies over the task contexts. Compared against eight representative or recent meta reinforcement learning methods, GLiBRL achieves the highest aggregate zero-shot test performance on both the MuJoCo locomotion and MetaWorld manipulation benchmarks.
Received β€” 11 March 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
  • βœ‡cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
  • Vectorized Online POMDP Planning Marcus Hoerger Β· Muhammad Sudrajat Β· Hanna Kurniawati
    arXiv:2510.27191v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Planning under partial observability is an essential capability of autonomous robots. The Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) provides a powerful framework for planning under partial observability problems, capturing the stochastic effects of actions and the limited information available through noisy observations. POMDP solving could benefit tremendously from massive parallelization on today's hardware, but parallelizin
     

Vectorized Online POMDP Planning

arXiv:2510.27191v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Planning under partial observability is an essential capability of autonomous robots. The Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) provides a powerful framework for planning under partial observability problems, capturing the stochastic effects of actions and the limited information available through noisy observations. POMDP solving could benefit tremendously from massive parallelization on today's hardware, but parallelizing POMDP solvers has been challenging. Most solvers rely on interleaving numerical optimization over actions with the estimation of their values, which creates dependencies and synchronization bottlenecks between parallel processes that can offset the benefits of parallelization. In this paper, we propose Vectorized Online POMDP Planner (VOPP), a novel parallel online solver that leverages a recent POMDP formulation which analytically solves part of the optimization component, leaving numerical computations to consist of only estimation of expectations. VOPP represents all data structures related to planning as a collection of tensors, and implements all planning steps as fully vectorized computations over this representation. The result is a massively parallel online solver with no dependencies or synchronization bottlenecks between concurrent processes. Experimental results indicate that VOPP is at least $20\times$ more efficient in computing near-optimal solutions compared to an existing state-of-the-art parallel online solver. Moreover, VOPP outperforms state-of-the-art sequential online solvers, while using a planning budget that is $1000\times$ smaller.
❌