❌

Normal view

Received β€” 8 April 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

Composer Vector: Style-steering Symbolic Music Generation in a Latent Space

arXiv:2604.03333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Symbolic music generation has made significant progress, yet achieving fine-grained and flexible control over composer style remains challenging. Existing training-based methods for composer style conditioning depend on large labeled datasets. Besides, these methods typically support only single-composer generation at a time, limiting their applicability to more creative or blended scenarios. In this work, we propose Composer Vector, an inference-time steering method that operates directly in the model's latent space to control composer style without retraining. Through experiments on multiple symbolic music generation models, we show that Composer Vector effectively guides generations toward target composer styles, enabling smooth and interpretable control through a continuous steering coefficient. It also enables seamless fusion of multiple styles within a unified latent space framework. Overall, our work demonstrates that simple latent space steering provides a practical and general mechanism for controllable symbolic music generation, enabling more flexible and interactive creative workflows. Code and Demo are available here: https://github.com/JiangXunyi/Composer-Vector and https://jiangxunyi.github.io/composervector.github.io/
Received β€” 5 March 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

Low-Resource Guidance for Controllable Latent Audio Diffusion

arXiv:2603.04366v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative audio requires fine-grained controllable outputs, yet most existing methods require model retraining on specific controls or inference-time controls (\textit{e.g.}, guidance) that can also be computationally demanding. By examining the bottlenecks of existing guidance-based controls, in particular their high cost-per-step due to decoder backpropagation, we introduce a guidance-based approach through selective TFG and Latent-Control Heads (LatCHs), which enables controlling latent audio diffusion models with low computational overhead. LatCHs operate directly in latent space, avoiding the expensive decoder step, and requiring minimal training resources (7M parameters and $\approx$ 4 hours of training). Experiments with Stable Audio Open demonstrate effective control over intensity, pitch, and beats (and a combination of those) while maintaining generation quality. Our method balances precision and audio fidelity with far lower computational costs than standard end-to-end guidance. Demo examples can be found at https://zacharynovack.github.io/latch/latch.html.
Received β€” 17 February 2026 ⏭ cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

BiasFreeBench: a Benchmark for Mitigating Bias in Large Language Model Responses

arXiv:2510.00232v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing studies on bias mitigation methods for large language models (LLMs) use diverse baselines and metrics to evaluate debiasing performance, leading to inconsistent comparisons among them. Moreover, their evaluations are mostly based on the comparison between LLMs' probabilities of biased and unbiased contexts, which ignores the gap between such evaluations and real-world use cases where users interact with LLMs by reading model responses and expect fair and safe outputs rather than LLMs' probabilities. To enable consistent evaluation across debiasing methods and bridge this gap, we introduce BiasFreeBench, an empirical benchmark that comprehensively compares eight mainstream bias mitigation techniques (covering four prompting-based and four training-based methods) on two test scenarios (multi-choice QA and open-ended multi-turn QA) by reorganizing existing datasets into a unified query-response setting. We further introduce a response-level metric, Bias-Free Score, to measure the extent to which LLM responses are fair, safe, and anti-stereotypical. Debiasing performances are systematically compared and analyzed across key dimensions: the prompting vs. training paradigm, model size, and generalization of different training strategies to unseen bias types. We release our benchmark, aiming to establish a unified testbed for bias mitigation research.
❌