arXiv:2604.04074v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Peer review in machine learning is under growing pressure from rising submission volume and limited reviewer time. Most LLM-based reviewing systems read only the manuscript and generate comments from the paper's own narrative. This makes their outputs sensitive to presentation quality and leaves them weak when the evidence needed for review lies in related work or released code. We present FactReview, an evidence-grounded reviewing system that combines claim extraction, literature positioning, and execution-based claim verification. Given a submission, FactReview identifies major claims and reported results, retrieves nearby work to clarify the paper's technical position, and, when code is available, executes the released repository under bounded budgets to test central empirical claims. It then produces a concise review and an evidence report that assigns each major claim one of five labels: Supported, Supported by the paper, Partially supported, In conflict, or Inconclusive. In a case study on CompGCN, FactReview reproduces results that closely match those reported for link prediction and node classification, yet also shows that the paper's broader performance claim across tasks is not fully sustained: on MUTAG graph classification, the reproduced result is 88.4%, whereas the strongest baseline reported in the paper remains 92.6%. The claim is therefore only partially supported. More broadly, this case suggests that AI is most useful in peer review not as a final decision-maker, but as a tool for gathering evidence and helping reviewers produce more evidence-grounded assessments. The code is public at https://github.com/DEFENSE-SEU/Review-Assistant.

arXiv:2603.02215v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chemical reaction prediction is pivotal for accelerating drug discovery and synthesis planning. Despite advances in data-driven models, current approaches are hindered by an overemphasis on parameter and dataset scaling. Some methods coupled with evaluation techniques that bypass fundamental challenges in reaction representation and fail to capture deep chemical intuition like reaction common sense and {topological atom mapping logic}. We argue that the core challenge lies in instilling these knowledge into the models. To this end, we propose a unified framework that prioritizes chemical understanding over scale through three key innovations: (1) a {Latent Chemical Consistency} objective that models reactions as movements on a continuous chemical manifold, ensuring reversible and physically plausible transformations; (2) a {Hierarchical Cognitive Curriculum} that trains the model through progressive stages, from syntax mastery to semantic reasoning, building robust chemical intuition; (3) {Atom-Map Permutation Invariance (AMPI)}, which force the model to learn invariant relational topology and balance multi-task learning. (4)and structured plan-based reasoning to improve the performance of the LLMs. Our compact {0.5B-parameter model}, \textbf{RxnNano} significantly outperforms fine-tuned LLMs ten times larger (>7B) and all the domain baselines, achieving a 23.5\% Top-1 accuracy improvement on rigorous benchmarks without test-time augmentation. https://github.com/rlisml/RxnNano.