arXiv:2503.12575v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models have achieved remarkable progress in text-to-image generation, yet aligning them with human preference remains challenging due to the presence of multiple, sometimes conflicting, evaluation metrics (e.g., semantic consistency, aesthetics, and human preference scores). Existing alignment methods typically optimize for a single metric or rely on scalarized reward aggregation, which can bias the model toward specific evaluation criteria. To address this challenge, we propose BalancedDPO, a framework that achieves multi-metric preference alignment within the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) paradigm. Unlike prior DPO variants that rely on a single metric, BalancedDPO introduces a majority-vote consensus over multiple preference scorers and integrates it directly into the DPO training loop with dynamic reference model updates. This consensus-based formulation avoids reward-scale conflicts and ensures more stable gradient directions across heterogeneous metrics. Experiments on Pick-a-Pic, PartiPrompt, and HPD datasets demonstrate that BalancedDPO consistently improves preference win rates over the baselines across Stable Diffusion 1.5, Stable Diffusion 2.1 and SDXL backbones. Comprehensive ablations further validate the benefits of majority-vote aggregation and dynamic reference updating, highlighting the method's robustness and generalizability across diverse alignment settings.

arXiv:2603.08706v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training large language models (LLMs) as autonomous agents often begins with imitation learning, but it only teaches agents what to do without understanding why: agents never contrast successful actions against suboptimal alternatives and thus lack awareness of action quality. Recent approaches attempt to address this by introducing self-reflection supervision derived from contrasts between expert and alternative actions. However, the training paradigm fundamentally remains imitation learning: the model imitates pre-constructed reflection text rather than learning to reason autonomously. We propose Agentic Critical Training (ACT), a reinforcement learning paradigm that trains agents to identify the better action among alternatives. By rewarding whether the model's judgment is correct, ACT drives the model to autonomously develop reasoning about action quality, producing genuine self-reflection rather than imitating it. Across three challenging agent benchmarks, ACT consistently improves agent performance when combined with different post-training methods. It achieves an average improvement of 5.07 points over imitation learning and 4.62 points over reinforcement learning. Compared to approaches that inject reflection capability through knowledge distillation, ACT also demonstrates clear advantages, yielding an average improvement of 2.42 points. Moreover, ACT enables strong out-of-distribution generalization on agentic benchmarks and improves performance on general reasoning benchmarks without any reasoning-specific training data, highlighting the value of our method. These results suggest that ACT is a promising path toward developing more reflective and capable LLM agents.