arXiv:2609.12808v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Unlearning benchmarks such as TOFU and MUSE certify forgetting by reading the model's final answer, where a model that refuses to answer already counts as having forgotten. We show that this model-level certificate does not transfer once the model is deployed as an agent. We introduce K-Bench, a benchmark that scores LLM unlearning under agentic deployment. K-Bench inspects all six channels a ReAct agent exposes, including its chain-of-thought (CoT), tool calls and tool observations, and elicited summary. A query counts as leaked if the secret appears in any of them. Each experiment places the secret in exactly one of the agent's three sources (the weights, the prompt, or the retrieval store). The K-Score is computed separately for each source and credits forgetting only when the agent remains usable. Clearing the answer channel does not make the secret unrecoverable. On structured retrieval, the secret stays verbatim in the tool-observation channel and the aggregate leak rate is unchanged. When the secret lives in the prompt or the retrieval store, TOFU and MUSE report no leakage, while the deployed agent still leaks it on 22--86\% of queries. When the secret is in the weights, none of the twenty evaluated published methods demonstrably removes it, and only an input-corruption intervention reaches selective forgetting under the evaluated observer. The top-ranked method changes across base models. A refusal-tuning method resists the evaluated extraction without verified knowledge removal.

arXiv:2609.13024v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As a key model compression technique, knowledge distillation aims to transfer knowledge from a high-capacity teacher model to a lightweight student model for enhancing the latter's performance. In this work, we reviewed the feature knowledge distillation for 3D-CNNs and observed that most feature distillation methods in video analysis are simple adaptations of those used in image analysis, often neglecting the differences of video features in the temporal dimension. To address this issue, we proposed Label-Guided Knowledge Distillation (LGKD) to guide the distillation of student model features using ground truth labels. Our method entails two components: sample-wise distillation and class-wise distillation, enabling the student model to learn feature representation of the teacher model at two levels. Sample-wise distillation utilizes label information and the teacher's probability distribution to guide the learning of features that significantly impact temporal accuracy while mitigating noise. Meanwhile, class-wise feature distillation employs a prototype network to further capture the relational knowledge among samples within the same category, enhancing the student's ability to learn higher-dimensional semantic information and improving model generalization. To demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our method, we conducted comprehensive experiments on two benchmark action recognition datasets, UCF101 and HMDB51, achieving competitive results.