❌

Normal view

Spatial immune remodeling of the liver metastases: discovering the path to antimetastatic therapy

J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Mar 18;13(3):e011002. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011002.

ABSTRACT

The intrinsic characteristics of metastatic tumors are of great importance in terms of the development of antimetastatic treatment strategies. Elucidation from a spatial immune perspective has the potential to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying immune escape, effectively addressing the limitations of relying solely on the analysis of immune cell subpopulation transcriptional profiles. Advances in spatial omics technology enable researchers to precisely analyze precious liver metastasis samples in a high-throughput manner, revealing spatial alterations in immune cell distribution induced by metastasis and exploring the molecular basis of the remodeling process. The aggregation of specific cell subpopulations in distinct regions not only modifies local immune characteristics but also concurrently affects global biological behaviors of liver metastatic tumors. Identifying specific spatial immune characteristics in pretreatment or early-stage treatment tissue samples may achieve accurate clinical predictions. Moreover, developing strategies that target spatial immune remodeling is a promising avenue for future antimetastatic therapy.

PMID:40107672 | PMC:PMC11927485 | DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-011002

Cell-free epigenomes enhanced fragmentomics-based model for early detection of lung cancer

Clin Transl Med. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70225. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70225.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality, highlighting the need for innovative non-invasive early detection methods. Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis shows promise, its sensitivity in early-stage lung cancer patients remains a challenge. This study aimed to integrate insights from epigenetic modifications and fragmentomic features of cfDNA using machine learning to develop a more accurate lung cancer detection model.

METHODS: To address this issue, a multi-centre prospective cohort study was conducted, with participants harbouring suspicious malignant lung nodules and healthy volunteers recruited from two clinical centres. Plasma cfDNA was analysed for its epigenetic and fragmentomic profiles using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing, reduced representation bisulphite sequencing and low-pass whole-genome sequencing. Machine learning algorithms were then employed to integrate the multi-omics data, aiding in the development of a precise lung cancer detection model.

RESULTS: Cancer-related changes in cfDNA fragmentomics were significantly enriched in specific genes marked by cell-free epigenomes. A total of 609 genes were identified, and the corresponding cfDNA fragmentomic features were utilised to construct the ensemble model. This model achieved a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 83.1%, with an AUC of 0.94 in the independent validation set. Notably, the model demonstrated exceptional sensitivity for stage I lung cancer cases, achieving 95.1%. It also showed remarkable performance in detecting minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, with a sensitivity of 96.2%, highlighting its potential for early detection in clinical settings.

CONCLUSIONS: With feature selection guided by multiple epigenetic sequencing approaches, the cfDNA fragmentomics-based machine learning model demonstrated outstanding performance in the independent validation cohort. These findings highlight its potential as an effective non-invasive strategy for the early detection of lung cancer.

KEYPOINTS: Our study elucidated the regulatory relationships between epigenetic modifications and their effects on fragmentomic features. Identifying epigenetically regulated genes provided a critical foundation for developing the cfDNA fragmentomics-based machine learning model. The model demonstrated exceptional clinical performance, highlighting its substantial potential for translational application in clinical practice.

PMID:39909829 | PMC:PMC11798665 | DOI:10.1002/ctm2.70225

❌