❌

Normal view

United multi-omics and machine learning refine regulatory T cell-defined hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes

iScience. 2025 Dec 3;29(1):114328. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.114328. eCollection 2026 Jan 16.

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly heterogeneous and aggressive, and the absence of precision individual treatment regimen enables repeated immune escape. Exploiting regulatory T cell (Treg) marker genes as key classifiers, we used 10 clustering algorithms to integrate the multi-omics HCC patient data and combined them with 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms to delineate molecular subtypes predictive of prognosis and immune response. We identified two cancer subtypes (CSs) that are associated with prognosis, with the second subtype (CS2) showing the most favorable prognostic outcomes. Subsequently, 9 key genes were screened for HCC model scoring, stratifying patients into low-risk (good prognosis, responsive to immunotherapy) and high-risk (poor outcome, not responsive to immunotherapy) groups. The high-risk group may be effective against the mTOR inhibitor AZD8055. Comprehensive multi-omics data and multiple ML algorithms offer key insights into HCC occurrence and evolution, with model scores guiding patient prognosis and treatment clinically.

PMID:41561382 | PMC:PMC12814435 | DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2025.114328

Development, advancement, and clinical integration of artificial intelligence technology in gastric cancer

Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 Nov 28;138(24):3332-50. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003922. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Personalized medicine for gastric cancer continues to face numerous challenges, primarily due to the complexity of clinical decision making and the difficulty of integrating multimodal data. Artificial intelligence (AI), with its powerful capabilities in feature learning and pattern recognition, is emerging as a key technology to overcome these barriers. It provides critical support in areas such as early screening, histological subtyping, prediction of treatment response, and prognostic risk stratification. This review examines the application of AI in diagnosing and treating gastric cancer, with particular attention to the current mainstream AI methodologies, including feature engineering and deep learning and the rapidly evolving pretrained foundation models and multimodal large models. With the integration of medical images, digital pathology, multiomics data, and structured clinical information, AI systems are increasingly effective at capturing tumor heterogeneity and supporting complex clinical decisions in real time. On the one hand, task-specific models have demonstrated excellent performance in subtyping, staging, and prognosis assessment. On the other hand, the rise of foundation models and general-purpose large models is redefining the limits of AI in cross-task transfer, complex reasoning, and human-machine interaction. These technologies hold promise in addressing key obstacles such as data scarcity, modality heterogeneity, and fragmented clinical workflows, offering a feasible path toward a unified and efficient AI-driven diagnostic and therapeutic system for gastric cancer. As technological maturity progresses alongside the development of robust safety and ethical frameworks, AI is expected to evolve from a static auxiliary interpretation tool into an intelligent decision-making platform capable of semantic understanding, dynamic feedback, and multidisciplinary collaboration-therefore playing a pivotal role across the full spectrum of precision medicine in gastric cancer.

PMID:41400327 | PMC:PMC12721780 | DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000003922

AI-driven virtual cell models in preclinical research: technical pathways, validation mechanisms, and clinical translation potential

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 11 December 2025; doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02198-6

AI-driven virtual cell models in preclinical research: technical pathways, validation mechanisms, and clinical translation potential

AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls

arXiv:2511.22619v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As intelligence increases, so does its shadow. AI deception, in which systems induce false beliefs to secure self-beneficial outcomes, has evolved from a speculative concern to an empirically demonstrated risk across language models, AI agents, and emerging frontier systems. This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field, covering its core concepts, methodologies, genesis, and potential mitigations. First, we identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception. We then review existing empirical studies and associated risks, highlighting deception as a sociotechnical safety challenge. We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment. Deception emergence reveals the mechanisms underlying AI deception: systems with sufficient capability and incentive potential inevitably engage in deceptive behaviors when triggered by external conditions. Deception treatment, in turn, focuses on detecting and addressing such behaviors. On deception emergence, we analyze incentive foundations across three hierarchical levels and identify three essential capability preconditions required for deception. We further examine contextual triggers, including supervision gaps, distributional shifts, and environmental pressures. On deception treatment, we conclude detection methods covering benchmarks and evaluation protocols in static and interactive settings. Building on the three core factors of deception emergence, we outline potential mitigation strategies and propose auditing approaches that integrate technical, community, and governance efforts to address sociotechnical challenges and future AI risks. To support ongoing work in this area, we release a living resource at www.deceptionsurvey.com.

From Cross-Task Examples to In-Task Prompts: A Graph-Based Pseudo-Labeling Framework for In-context Learning

arXiv:2510.24528v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The capability of in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to perform novel tasks without parameter updates by conditioning on a few input-output examples. However, collecting high-quality examples for new or challenging tasks can be costly and labor-intensive. In this work, we propose a cost-efficient two-stage pipeline that reduces reliance on LLMs for data labeling. Our approach first leverages readily available cross-task examples to prompt an LLM and pseudo-label a small set of target task instances. We then introduce a graph-based label propagation method that spreads label information to the remaining target examples without additional LLM queries. The resulting fully pseudo-labeled dataset is used to construct in-task demonstrations for ICL. This pipeline combines the flexibility of cross-task supervision with the scalability of LLM-free propagation. Experiments across five tasks demonstrate that our method achieves strong performance while lowering labeling costs.

Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Prediction Models for HCC: Current Trends and Future Prospects

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 19;56(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01249-1.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant liver tumor, with rising incidence and mortality rates posing a significant threat to global public health. Accurate prediction of liver cancer occurrence and progression is essential for improving patient prognosis. This study uses bibliometric methods to analyze the current state and future trends in liver cancer prediction research.

METHODS: A search was conducted in the Web of Science (WOS) database on October 22, 2023, identifying 1092 articles on liver cancer prediction. These articles were quantitatively analyzed using CiteSpace 6.2 software, with a focus on research hotspots, authors, countries, and keywords.

RESULTS: The study involved 114 countries, 4254 institutions, and 280 journals, with 48,788 citations. China (826 papers) and the USA (96 papers) dominate the field. Leading institutions include Sun Yat-sen University, Fudan University, Zhejiang University, and Yonsei University. The most cited journals were Hepatology (2209 citations) and Journal of Hepatology (946 citations). Frontiers in Oncology had the highest H-index (14). Key authors include Kim Seung Up (23 papers) and Ahn Sang Hoon (H-index = 14). Early research focused on risk factors and staging, while recent studies emphasize DNA methylation, immune microenvironments, and tumor metastasis. Future research will focus on multi-omics data integration and AI-driven predictive model optimization.

CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive overview of liver cancer prediction research, highlighting key trends and the potential of multi-omics data and machine learning to enhance predictive models and clinical outcomes.

PMID:40537718 | DOI:10.1007/s12029-025-01249-1

OTUB1/NDUFS2 axis promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis through protecting against mitochondrial cell death

Cell Death Discovery, Published online: 23 April 2024; doi:10.1038/s41420-024-01948-x

OTUB1/NDUFS2 axis promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis through protecting against mitochondrial cell death

Fast mass spectrometry search and clustering of untargeted metabolomics data

Nature Biotechnology, Published online: 02 January 2024; doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01985-4

MASST+ speeds up querying of metabolomics mass spectrometry data by two orders of magnitude.

Common and rare variant associations with clonal haematopoiesis phenotypes

Nature, Published online: 30 November 2022; doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05448-9

Exome sequence data from 628,388 individuals was used to identify 24 risk loci in 40,208 carriers of clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and link them to other conditions including COVID-19, cardiovascular disease and cancer.
❌