Normal view
-
cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
-
Exploring Health Misinformation Detection with Multi-Agent Debate
arXiv:2512.09935v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fact-checking health-related claims has become increasingly critical as misinformation proliferates online. Effective verification requires both the retrieval of high-quality evidence and rigorous reasoning processes. In this paper, we propose a two-stage framework for health misinformation detection: Agreement Score Prediction followed by Multi-Agent Debate. In the first stage, we employ large language models (LLMs) to independently evaluate retr
-
cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
-
A Field Guide to Deploying AI Agents in Clinical Practice
arXiv:2509.26153v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) integrated into agent-driven workflows hold immense promise for healthcare, yet a significant gap exists between their potential and practical implementation within clinical settings. To address this, we present a practitioner-oriented field manual for deploying generative agents that use electronic health record (EHR) data. This guide is informed by our experience deploying the "irAE-Agent", an automated system to
A Field Guide to Deploying AI Agents in Clinical Practice
-
cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
-
From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems
arXiv:2503.01424v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Research is a fundamental process driving the advancement of human civilization, yet it demands substantial time and effort from researchers. In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has inspired researchers to explore how AI can accelerate and enhance research. To monitor relevant advancements, this paper presents a systematic review of the progress in this domain. Specifically, we organize the relev
From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems
-
cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
-
MARIA: A Framework for Marginal Risk Assessment without Ground Truth in AI Systems
arXiv:2510.27163v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Before deploying an AI system to replace an existing process, it must be compared with the incumbent to ensure improvement without added risk. Traditional evaluation relies on ground truth for both systems, but this is often unavailable due to delayed or unknowable outcomes, high costs, or incomplete data, especially for long-standing systems deemed safe by convention. The more practical solution is not to compute absolute risk but the differenc
MARIA: A Framework for Marginal Risk Assessment without Ground Truth in AI Systems
-
cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
-
From Cross-Task Examples to In-Task Prompts: A Graph-Based Pseudo-Labeling Framework for In-context Learning
arXiv:2510.24528v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The capability of in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to perform novel tasks without parameter updates by conditioning on a few input-output examples. However, collecting high-quality examples for new or challenging tasks can be costly and labor-intensive. In this work, we propose a cost-efficient two-stage pipeline that reduces reliance on LLMs for data labeling. Our approach first leverages readily available cross-task
From Cross-Task Examples to In-Task Prompts: A Graph-Based Pseudo-Labeling Framework for In-context Learning
-
npj Digital Medicine
-
When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 17 October 2025; doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02008-zWhen helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior
When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 17 October 2025; doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02008-z
When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior-
Journal of Medical Internet Research
-
Fine-Tuning Methods for Large Language Models in Clinical Medicine by Supervised Fine-Tuning and Direct Preference Optimization: Comparative Evaluation
Background: Large language model (LLM) fine tuning is the process of adjusting out-of-the-box model weights using a dataset of interest. Fine tuning can be a powerful technique to improve model performance in fields like medicine, where data access is restricted and LLMs may have poor out-of-the-box performance. Objective: In this study we investigated the benefits of fine tuning with supervised fine tuning (SFT) and direct preference optimization (DPO) across a range of LLM applications for med
Fine-Tuning Methods for Large Language Models in Clinical Medicine by Supervised Fine-Tuning and Direct Preference Optimization: Comparative Evaluation
-
(Multiomics OR Omics) AND (Lung OR gastric OR Hepatocellular)
-
A statistical framework for multi-trait rare variant analysis in large-scale whole-genome sequencing studies
Nat Comput Sci. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1038/s43588-024-00764-8. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTLarge-scale whole-genome sequencing (WGS) studies have improved our understanding of the contributions of coding and noncoding rare variants to complex human traits. Leveraging association effect sizes across multiple traits in WGS rare variant association analysis can improve statistical power over single-trait analysis, and also detect pleiotropic genes and regions. Existing multi-trait methods have limi
A statistical framework for multi-trait rare variant analysis in large-scale whole-genome sequencing studies
Nat Comput Sci. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1038/s43588-024-00764-8. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Large-scale whole-genome sequencing (WGS) studies have improved our understanding of the contributions of coding and noncoding rare variants to complex human traits. Leveraging association effect sizes across multiple traits in WGS rare variant association analysis can improve statistical power over single-trait analysis, and also detect pleiotropic genes and regions. Existing multi-trait methods have limited ability to perform rare variant analysis of large-scale WGS data. We propose MultiSTAAR, a statistical framework and computationally scalable analytical pipeline for functionally informed multi-trait rare variant analysis in large-scale WGS studies. MultiSTAAR accounts for relatedness, population structure and correlation among phenotypes by jointly analyzing multiple traits, and further empowers rare variant association analysis by incorporating multiple functional annotations. We applied MultiSTAAR to jointly analyze three lipid traits in 61,838 multi-ethnic samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program. We discovered and replicated new associations with lipid traits missed by single-trait analysis.
PMID:39920506 | DOI:10.1038/s43588-024-00764-8
-
(Multiomics OR Omics) AND (Lung OR gastric OR Hepatocellular)
-
Integrating multiomics analysis and machine learning to refine the molecular subtyping and prognostic analysis of stomach adenocarcinoma
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):3843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87444-3.ABSTRACTStomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is a common malignancy with high heterogeneity and a lack of highly precise treatment options. We downloaded the multiomics data of STAD patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-STAD cohort, which included mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, somatic mutation, and DNA methylation data, from the sxdyc website. We synthesized the multiomics data of patients with STAD using 10 clustering methods
Integrating multiomics analysis and machine learning to refine the molecular subtyping and prognostic analysis of stomach adenocarcinoma
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):3843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87444-3.
ABSTRACT
Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is a common malignancy with high heterogeneity and a lack of highly precise treatment options. We downloaded the multiomics data of STAD patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-STAD cohort, which included mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, somatic mutation, and DNA methylation data, from the sxdyc website. We synthesized the multiomics data of patients with STAD using 10 clustering methods, construct a consensus machine learning-driven signature (CMLS)-related prognostic models by combining 10 machine learning methods, and evaluated the prognosis models using the C-index. The prognostic relationship between CMLS and STAD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the independent prognostic value of CMLS was determined by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. we also evaluated the immune characteristics, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity of different CMLS groups. The results of the multiomics analysis classified STAD into three subtypes, with CS1 resulting in the best survival outcome. In total, 10 hub genes (CES3, AHCYL2, APOD, EFEMP1, CYP1B1, ASPN, CPE, CLIP3, MAP1B, and DKK1) were screened and constructed the CMLS was significantly correlated with prognosis in patients with STAD and was an independent prognostic factor for patients with STAD. Using the CMLS risk score, all patients were divided into a high CMLS group and a low CMLS group. Patients in the low-CMLS group had better survival, more enriched immune cells, and higher tumor mutation load scores, suggesting better immunotherapy responsiveness and a possible "hot tumor" phenotype. Patients in the high-CMLS group had a significantly poorer prognosis and were less sensitive to immunotherapy but were likely to benefit more from chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In this study, 10 clustering methods and 10 machine learning methods were combined to analyze the multiomics of STAD, classify STAD into three subtypes, and constructed CMLS-related prognostic model features, which are important for accurate management and effective treatment of STAD.
PMID:39885324 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-87444-3