Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 7;16:1479550. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1479550. eCollection 2025.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To construct a prediction model consisting of metabolites and proteins in peripheral blood plasma to predict whether patients with unresectable stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer can benefit from immunotherapy before it is administered.

METHODS: Peripheral blood plasma was collected from unresectable stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were negative for driver mutations before receiving immunotherapy. Then we classified samples according to the follow-up results after two courses of immunotherapy and non-targeted metabolomics and proteomics analyses were performed to select different metabolites and proteins. Finally, potential biomarkers were picked out by applying machine learning methods including random forest and stepwise regression and prediction models were constructed by logistic regression.

RESULTS: The presence of metabolites and proteins in peripheral blood plasma was causally associated with both non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1/PD-1 expression levels. A total of 2 differential metabolites including 5-sulfooxymethylfurfural and Anthranilic acid and 2 differential proteins including Immunoglobulin heavy variable 1-45 and Microfibril-associated glycoprotein 4 were selected as reliable biomarkers. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model built on clinical risks was merely 0.659. The AUC of metabolomics prediction model was 0.977 and the AUC of proteomics was 0.875 while the AUC of the integrative-omics prediction model was 0.955.

CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic and protein biomarkers in peripheral blood both have high efficacy and reliability in the prediction of immunotherapy sensitivity in unresectable stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer, but validation in larger population-based cohorts is still needed.

PMID:39991162 | PMC:PMC11842339 | DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1479550

Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 6;15:1517312. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1517312. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous tumor, and the development of accurate predictive models for prognosis and drug sensitivity remains challenging.

METHODS: We integrated laboratory data and public cohorts to conduct a multi-omics analysis of HCC, which included bulk RNA sequencing, proteomic analysis, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), spatial transcriptomics sequencing (ST-seq), and genome sequencing. We constructed a tumor purity (TP) and tumor microenvironment (TME) prognostic risk model. Proteomic analysis validated the TP-TME-related signatures. Joint analysis of scRNA-seq and ST-seq revealed characteristic clusters associated with TP high-risk subtypes, and immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of key genes. We conducted functional enrichment analysis, transcription factor activity inference, cell-cell interaction, drug efficacy analysis, and mutation information analysis to identify a novel subtype of HCC.

RESULTS: Our analyses constructed a robust HCC prognostic risk prediction model. The patients with TP-TME high-risk subtypes predominantly exhibit hypoxia and activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin, Notch, and TGF-beta signaling pathways. Furthermore, we identified a novel subtype, XPO1+Epithelial. This subtype expresses signatures of the TP risk subtype and aligns with the biological behavior of high-risk patients. Additional analyses revealed that XPO1+Epithelial is influenced primarily by fibroblasts via ligand-receptor interactions, such as FN1-(ITGAV+ITGB1), and constitute a significant component of the TP-TME subtype. Moreover, XPO1+Epithelial interact with monocytes/macrophages, T/NK cells, and endothelial cells through ligand-receptor pairs, including MIF-(CD74+CXCR4), MIF-(CD74+CD44), and VEGFA-VEGFR1R2, respectively, thereby promoting the recruitment of immune-suppressive cells and angiogenesis. The ST-seq cohort treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) presented elevated levels of TP and TME risk subtype signature genes, as well as XPO1+Epithelial, T-cell, and endothelial cell infiltration in the treatment response group. Drug sensitivity analyses indicated that TP-TME high-risk subtypes, including sorafenib and pembrolizumab, were associated with sensitivity to multiple drugs. Further exploratory analyses revealed that CTLA4, PDCD1, and the cancer antigens MSLN, MUC1, EPCAM, and PROM1 presented significantly increase expression levels in the high-risk subtype group.

CONCLUSIONS: This study constructed a robust prognostic model for HCC and identified novel subgroups at the single-cell level, potentially assisting in the assessment of prognostic risk for HCC patients and facilitating personalized drug therapy.

PMID:39712016 | PMC:PMC11659151 | DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1517312