Eur J Cancer. 2025 Dec 9;231:116050. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116050. Epub 2025 Oct 20.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a versatile biomarker in solid tumors. Extensive research supports their clinical relevance and led to regulatory approval in breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. However, clinical adoption remains limited mainly due to the lack of consensus and standardized technologies. Additionally, CTC research lacks unified direction. To address these gaps, an international expert panel was established to assess the current and future clinical utility of CTCs.

METHODS: A panel of 11 CTC experts identified key areas of controversy, informing a structured survey distributed to 55 international multidisciplinary experts. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70 % agreement. Areas without consensus were discussed in a virtual meeting, leading to final statements on the clinical integration of CTCs.

RESULTS: Thirty-seven experts completed the survey. Consensus was reached on the clinical utility of CTCs for prognosis and treatment monitoring in metastatic breast (BC) and prostate (PC) cancers, including AR-V7 testing in metastatic castration-resistant PC for therapy selection. In other tumors, CTCs remain investigational. Experts agreed that while clinical utility is not yet established in early-stage disease, CTCs show promise in early BC, especially combined with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for minimal residual disease detection. CellSearch® is currently the only platform with high-level evidence for clinical use, though emerging technologies are promising. Key challenges include improving detection sensitivity/specificity, standardizing workflows, generating robust data, and clinician education. Experts emphasized shifting from enumeration to phenotypic and molecular characterization, particularly for treatment guidance, and highlighted the complementary role of CTCs and cfDNA, advocating for integrated liquid biopsy approaches.

CONCLUSIONS: This consensus offers practical guidance for clinical integration of CTCs and outlines strategic research priorities to unlock their full potential in precision oncology.

PMID:41172567 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116050

J Liq Biopsy. 2025 Jul 16;9:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100312. eCollection 2025 Sep.

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. It represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with distinct morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular profiles, which significantly impact clinical behavior and therapeutic response. Moreover, under treatment pressure, tumor cells may undergo molecular changes and phenotypic plasticity, leading to resistance and therapeutic failure. Although tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis and molecular characterization, it has several limitations, including invasiveness, sampling bias, and the inability to dynamically capture tumor evolution over time. Hence, a non-invasive and repeatable approach capable of real-time monitoring is increasingly needed. Liquid biopsy (LB), through the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has emerged as a powerful tool to complement tissue biopsy. It allows for longitudinal assessment of tumor burden, detection of minimal residual disease, and identification of molecular alterations relevant to targeted therapies. Despite promising results, the integration of LB into clinical practice is still limited by methodological heterogeneity, standardization gaps, and regulatory issues. Nonetheless, LB represents a key advancement toward precision oncology and may become essential in the personalized management of BC patients. In this review, we explore the current applications, benefits, and technical limitations of LB in different BC settings. We provide a comprehensive overview of the biological and clinical significance of CTCs and ctDNA, emphasizing their diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive roles. Finally, we present an updated summary of ongoing clinical trials that incorporate LB for clinical decision-making.

PMID:40740670 | PMC:PMC12308030 | DOI:10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100312