❌

Normal view

Gastric cancer: from biomarkers to functional precision medicine

Trends Mol Med. 2025 Jun 23:S1471-4914(25)00118-2. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2025.05.007. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a deadly disease because of late detection and limited treatment options at advanced stages. Treatment of patients with metastatic disease is based on chemotherapy, complemented by antibodies targeting HER2, VEGFR2, and more recently PD-1 or claudin 18.2. Further targets, such as FGFR2b, as well as novel drug classes including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies, are promising developments in GC treatment. Despite the failure of several targeted agents, the landscape of GC therapy is evolving rapidly, facilitated by umbrella or platform precision medicine trials. The integration of next-generation sequencing and other omics techniques into molecular tumor boards, as well as functional drug testing on patient-derived models, might bring us closer to personalized oncology and ultimately improve patient survival.

PMID:40555635 | DOI:10.1016/j.molmed.2025.05.007

Unraveling the role of GPCR signaling in metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-omics study with experimental validation

Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 6;16:1606125. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1606125. eCollection 2025.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is characterized by metabolic and immune heterogeneity, driving tumor progression and therapy resistance. While G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) signaling is known to regulate metabolism and immunity in cancers, its role in LUAD remains poorly defined. This study explores the influence of GPCR signaling on LUAD metabolism and immune landscape.

METHODS: We performed non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering of GPCR signaling genes in TCGA-LUAD cohort to identify distinct molecular subgroups. A prognostic model was developed based on GPCR signaling genes using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis and Cox regression. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed for metabolic pathway enrichment and immune infiltration. In addition, key genes within GPCR signaling were identified and validated through functional assays.

RESULTS: NMF clustering based on GPCR signaling identified three subgroups in LUAD, with cluster 3 exhibiting poorer overall survival and significant enrichment in multiple prognostic associated metabolism pathways including purine, pyrimidine, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism. Then, we developed a GPCRscore prognostic model and validated across multiple cohorts, which effectively stratified LUAD patients into distinct risk groups. High-risk LUAD patients had an immunosuppressive microenvironment and activated metabolic reprogramming. ADM was identified as a key gene in the high-risk group, correlating with tumor stage, immune suppression, and resistance to immunotherapy. Clinically, ADM was highly expressed in tumor tissues and shows elevated concentrations in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced-stage LUAD. Subsequently, we demonstrated that knock-down of ADM in LUAD cells impaired their proliferation, migration, and invasion, while also reducing the angiogenic potential of endothelial cells in vitro. Adrenomedullin promoted LUAD progression in a murine metastasis model. Further, adrenomedullin inhibited CD8+ T cells proliferation, induced exhaustion, and impaired cytotoxic function. Finally, drug sensitivity and cell viability analysis showed LUAD patients with high levels of ADM exhibited sensitivity to the treatment of Staurosporine and Dasatinib.

CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study reveals the pivotal role of GPCR signaling particularly mediated by ADM in orchestrating metabolic reprogramming and immune modulation in LUAD. ADM emerges as a potential predictive biomarker and therapeutic target, offering valuable implications for optimizing strategies.

PMID:40547013 | PMC:PMC12179119 | DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1606125

❌