Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Oct 14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18556-3. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) will be enriched for germline mutations (GLMs), particularly in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, but its distinction from sporadic pancreatic cancer (PC) remains unclear.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 111 resected PCs, including 13 patients with FPC (11.8%) and 98 with non-FPC (88.2%). Whole-exome sequencing targeted 151 cancer-related genes, with parallel gene expression profiling. GLMs were assessed by ClinVar and in silico tools. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores, COSMIC signatures, immune deconvolution, and survival were compared.

RESULTS: Patients with FPC and non-FPC were comparable in age, sex, tumor stage, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. ClinVar-annotated GLMs were found in 2/13 patients with FPC (15.4%) and 4/98 patients with non-FPC (4.1%). FPC cases more often carried pancreatitis-associated variants (SPINK1, CFTR), whereas non-FPC included HRR-related variants (PALB2, FANCG). When potentially pathogenic HRR-related variants were considered together, prevalence was similar (23.1% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.380). HRD scores did not differ (median 22 vs. 19, p = 0.591), and high HRD scores (≥ 42) were observed only in two non-FPC cases, including one with PALB2. Differential expression analysis revealed no significant differences after false discovery rate correction. Multivariate analysis indicated that FPC status was not an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.73, p = 0.084).

CONCLUSIONS: Transcriptomic profiles and HRD status were similar between patients with FPC and patients with non-FPC. A spectrum of GLMs was observed in both groups, suggesting that hereditary risk variants are not exclusive to FPC and underscoring the importance of germline testing in all patients with PC.

PMID:41085800 | DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-18556-3

Cancer Lett. 2025 Oct 11;634:218076. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.218076. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor macroenvironment (TMaE) jointly shape cancer biology by linking local cellular niches with systemic host physiology. The TME provides the immediate soil for tumor initiation, progression, and therapy resistance, whereas the TMaE integrates metabolic, immune, neuroendocrine, microbial, and inflammatory signals that remodel local ecosystems. Recent advances highlight how systemic factors, including aging, energy imbalance, chronic inflammation, cachexia, and psychosocial stress, interact with extracellular matrix remodeling, vascular dynamics, and immune surveillance to influence tumor dormancy, metastatic reactivation, and therapeutic outcomes. However, the conceptual boundaries between TME and TMaE remain unclear, mechanistic insights are limited, and current models insufficiently capture local-systemic crosstalk. Future strategies integrating multi-omics, advanced imaging, and humanized models are essential to map this multidimensional interplay. A deeper understanding of TME-TMaE will be critical to refine precision oncology, advance preventive strategies, and design combinatorial therapies targeting both local and systemic cancer ecosystems. This review highlights the roles of the TME and TMaE in tumor initiation, progression, and heterogeneity, their interactions, and the clinical implications for classification, therapy, and prognosis.

PMID:41083101 | DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2025.218076