Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms significantly affect patients’ quality of life. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for symptoms measurement in GERD patients is advocated by regulatory authority. Current tools for GERD symptoms evaluation are limited and the results can be biased by the recall bias. To better characterize the GERD symptoms, an e-diary was developed for daily GERD symptom monitoring. Objective: To build up and optimize a PRO-based e-diary, and to investigate the effect of symptom frequency on adherence. Methods: The GERD e-diary evaluated 8 daytime (acid regurgitation, cough, heartburn, sour taste in the mouth, hiccups, hoarseness, dysphagia, and chest pain) and 2 nighttime symptoms (acid regurgitation and cough) for consecutive 8 weeks. The adherence of e-diary, defined as daily completing rate of e-diary, was evaluated and optimized from First Stage to Third Stage with no reminder implemented in First Stage, sending reminding SMS (Short Message Service) text messaging upon detecting missing data in Second Stage (no reminder during the first 3 to 5 days after enrollment), and immediate installation of reminding system at enrollment in Third Stage. GERD symptom frequency was obtained by summation of the symptomatic days in each week. A multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the effects of system optimization and GERD symptom frequency on patient adherence, while controlling for potential confounding variables. Results: 138 GERD patients (M/F=70/68; age: mean 52.9, SD 12.3 years) were recruited. At First Stage, the adherence was 47.2%, 40% and 57.6% for nighttime, daytime and overall symptom. System optimization significantly improved adherence with increased adherence of nighttime symptoms by 12.5% (P=.005) and 10.9% (P=.01), daytime symptom by 21.7% (P

arXiv:2601.01576v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluating novelty is critical yet challenging in peer review, as reviewers must assess submissions against a vast, rapidly evolving literature. This report presents OpenNovelty, an LLM-powered agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis. The system operates through four phases: (1) extracting the core task and contribution claims to generate retrieval queries; (2) retrieving relevant prior work based on extracted queries via semantic search engine; (3) constructing a hierarchical taxonomy of core-task-related work and performing contribution-level full-text comparisons against each contribution; and (4) synthesizing all analyses into a structured novelty report with explicit citations and evidence snippets. Unlike naive LLM-based approaches, \textsc{OpenNovelty} grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments. We deploy our system on 500+ ICLR 2026 submissions with all reports publicly available on our website, and preliminary analysis suggests it can identify relevant prior work, including closely related papers that authors may overlook. OpenNovelty aims to empower the research community with a scalable tool that promotes fair, consistent, and evidence-backed peer review.

arXiv:2601.01627v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare field, it becomes essential to carefully evaluate their medical safety before clinical use. However, existing safety benchmarks remain predominantly English-centric, and test with only single-turn prompts despite multi-turn clinical consultations. To address these gaps, we introduce JMedEthicBench, the first multi-turn conversational benchmark for evaluating medical safety of LLMs for Japanese healthcare. Our benchmark is based on 67 guidelines from the Japan Medical Association and contains over 50,000 adversarial conversations generated using seven automatically discovered jailbreak strategies. Using a dual-LLM scoring protocol, we evaluate 27 models and find that commercial models maintain robust safety while medical-specialized models exhibit increased vulnerability. Furthermore, safety scores decline significantly across conversation turns (median: 9.5 to 5.0, $p

arXiv:2506.05623v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) generation holds significant promise for automating cloud infrastructure provisioning. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) present a promising opportunity to democratize IaC development by generating deployable infrastructure templates from natural language descriptions. However, current evaluation focuses on syntactic correctness while ignoring deployability, the critical measure of the utility of IaC configuration files. Six state-of-the-art LLMs performed poorly on deployability, achieving only 20.8$\sim$30.2% deployment success rate on the first attempt. In this paper, we construct DPIaC-Eval, the first deployability-centric IaC template benchmark consisting of 153 real-world scenarios cross 58 unique services. Also, we propose an LLM-based deployability-centric framework, dubbed IaCGen, that uses iterative feedback mechanism encompassing format verification, syntax checking, and live deployment stages, thereby closely mirroring the real DevOps workflows. Results show that IaCGen can make 54.6$\sim$91.6% generated IaC templates from all evaluated models deployable in the first 10 iterations. Additionally, human-in-the-loop feedback that provide direct guidance for the deployability errors, can further boost the performance to over 90% passItr@25 on all evaluated LLMs. Furthermore, we explore the trustworthiness of the generated IaC templates on user intent alignment and security compliance. The poor performance (25.2% user requirement coverage and 8.4% security compliance rate) indicates a critical need for continued research in this domain.

arXiv:2512.14329v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Dynamic prediction of locomotor capacity after stroke could enable more individualized rehabilitation, yet current assessments largely provide static impairment scores and do not indicate whether patients can perform specific tasks such as slope walking or stair climbing. Here, we present a wearable-informed data-physics hybrid generative framework that reconstructs a stroke survivor's locomotor control from wearable inertial sensing and predicts task-conditioned post-stroke locomotion in new environments. From a single 20 m level-ground walking trial recorded by five IMUs, the framework personalizes a physics-based digital avatar using a healthy-motion prior and hybrid imitation learning, generating dynamically feasible, patient-specific movements for inclined walking and stair negotiation. Across 11 stroke inpatients, predicted postures reached 82.2% similarity for slopes and 69.9% for stairs, substantially exceeding a physics-only baseline. In a multicentre pilot randomized study (n = 21; 28 days), access to scenario-specific locomotion predictions to support task selection and difficulty titration was associated with larger gains in Fugl-Meyer lower-extremity scores than standard care (mean change 6.0 vs 3.7 points; $p