Diagnostics (Basel). 2026 Feb 9;16(4):523. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics16040523.

ABSTRACT

Background: Liquid biopsy, particularly through the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), represents a significant advancement in oncology. Unlike traditional tissue biopsies, ctDNA offers a minimally invasive, real-time approach to cancer management. It has demonstrated considerable potential in early cancer detection, monitoring of therapeutic responses, and assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) to predict recurrence. By enabling comprehensive molecular profiling through a simple blood test, ctDNA supports the core principles of precision oncology, facilitating more personalized and adaptive treatment strategies. Methods: In the following article we describe the recent developments focused on refining ctDNA detection assays to improve sensitivity and specificity. Advanced technologies, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR, are commonly employed. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and multi-omics approaches-such as combining genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic data-has further enhanced the analytical power of ctDNA assays. Results: Emerging evidence shows that ctDNA-based liquid biopsy enables dynamic, real-time tracking of tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance. Clinical studies have demonstrated its efficacy in detecting early-stage cancers, guiding treatment selection, and predicting relapse with higher accuracy than some conventional methods. Moreover, AI-enhanced algorithms have improved signal detection, allowing for more precise and earlier identification of actionable mutations and MRD. Conclusions: ctDNA analysis via liquid biopsy is poised to revolutionize cancer care by offering a non-invasive, precise, and adaptive tool for tumor characterization and monitoring. Although obstacles remain-particularly regarding assay sensitivity, standardization, and economic feasibility-ongoing technological innovations and multi-omics integration are rapidly advancing its clinical viability. With continued progress, ctDNA-based liquid biopsy is likely to become a cornerstone of routine oncology practice.

PMID:41750672 | PMC:PMC12938931 | DOI:10.3390/diagnostics16040523

Innovation (Camb). 2025 Aug 6;7(1):101076. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101076. eCollection 2026 Jan 5.

ABSTRACT

Although circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation has emerged as the mainstream approach in multi-cancer detection blood tests (MCDBTs), the potential of integrating proteins and mutations, to enhance its performance remains unclear. The PROMISE study (NCT04972201) was conducted to investigate the feasibility of a multi-omics integration strategy in MCDBTs across nine types of cancers in head and neck (excluding nasopharynx), esophagus, lung, stomach, liver, biliary tract, pancreas, colorectum, and ovary. Blood samples were prospectively collected from 1,706 participants (840 non-cancer; 866 cancer) and then randomly divided into training and validation sets. The complementarity between various omics were investigated, and specific omics features were carefully selected for further multimodal model construction. The methylation-based classifier outperformed both the mutation-based and protein-based classifiers. As 95.0% of cancer cases detected by the mutation-based classifier were simultaneously identified by the methylation-based classifier, while 14.0% of the protein-positive samples were missed, protein markers may provide complementary value to the methylation-based classifier. Compared with the methylation-based classifier, the multimodal classifier combining methylation and protein features exhibited an improved sensitivity of 75.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.3%-80.3%) at the same specificity of 98.8% with the accuracy of top predicted origin (TPO1) of 73.1% (95% CI, 66.2%-79.2%). Notably, the TPO1 accuracy reached 100% in liver and ovarian cancers with negative results of the methylation-based classifier. Collectively, these data suggest that the integration of protein markers in the multimodal classifier can offer additional benefits to the methylation-based classifier, particularly in identifying liver and ovarian cancers.

PMID:41737326 | PMC:PMC12925926 | DOI:10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101076