arXiv:2605.25502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Educational aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) can support course improvement, but public aspect-labeled student feedback remains scarce because educational reviews are private, institution-specific, and expensive to annotate. This study introduces a controlled synthetic benchmark for educational ABSA built from 10,000 synthetic course reviews with explicit train-validation-test splits and a 20-aspect pedagogical schema spanning instructional quality, assessment and course management, learning demand, learning environment, and engagement. The corpus is generated with sampled target labels, sampled nuance attributes, and a realism-tuned prompt refined through a three-cycle judge-editor procedure. On the resulting benchmark, local baselines with TF-IDF, two-step transformers, and joint encoders show that the task is nontrivial; the strongest untuned model, BERT, reaches a held-out detection micro-F1 of 0.2760, while a modest lower-rate BERT schedule improves this to 0.2930. Full-test GPT-based inference with gpt-5.2 reaches 0.2519 micro-F1 in zero-shot mode and 0.2501 with retrieval-based few-shot prompting, placing batch inference above the classical baseline and close to the compact joint encoders. A conservative external evaluation on 2,829 mapped student-feedback reviews from Herath et al. yields a micro-F1 of 0.4593 for BERT on a 9-aspect overlap, indicating partial synthetic-to-real transfer. Realism and faithfulness analyses are reported as generator diagnostics that clarify how the benchmark was stabilized and where label noise remains. The study therefore contributes a synthetic educational ABSA corpus, a documented generation procedure, and a reproducible benchmark setting for a domain in which public labeled data remain difficult to obtain.

arXiv:2605.25584v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-robot task allocation usually assumes some combination of communication, known task models, or a coordinator. We study the opposite extreme, a regime common in practice but overlooked in theory, which we name Zero-Knowledge MRTA (ZK-MRTA): a robot team with no prior knowledge (no task models, not even the latent rank), no communication (no messages, no parameter sharing, no coordinator), and only a partial and privately-noisy view of a public stream of teammates' outcomes. A hidden low-rank structure governs which robot suits which task, and there are far more tasks than rounds, so most (robot, task) pairs are never attempted. Yet each robot can act well on tasks it never attempted, and onboard new tasks, by running online low-rank collaborative filtering over the broadcast (SwarmCF). The advantage over any structure-free learner is categorical, not a constant factor: a structure-free learner is provably at the prior-mean error floor on unseen pairs. We prove a matching per-robot sample complexity ({\Theta}(d) versus {\Theta}(n), in the rank d and the task count n), an anytime (cumulative-reward) separation under task scarcity, and a deterministic condition under which decentralized recovery from the masked broadcast is exact (validated empirically). Experiments quantify the value of the broadcast, a positive scaling law (per-robot unseen-pair skill rises with team size), and the strongest masking-robustness and anytime profile among low-rank methods, recovering most (about 80% on earned skill) of a centralized full-communication ceiling, and holding under capacity-1 contention and in a robotics-grounded sensing instance.

arXiv:2605.25601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Teacher education requires deliberate practice with learners who exhibit identifiable strengths, weaknesses, and partial mastery. Large language models could support such practice by simulating students with known skill components, enabling teachers to rehearse explanations, diagnoses, and instructional responses. For this purpose, however, the central requirement is neither to maximize benchmark accuracy nor to suppress isolated facts, but to control model behavior so that it reflects a specified skill profile. This paper investigates whether prompted language models can be steered to retain some skills while suppressing others. We introduce a benchmark-oriented framework in which an explicit skill vector represents a simulated student, prompt-based control specifies retained and missing competencies, and behavior is evaluated using profile-alignment metrics, retained-versus-forgotten comparisons, and cross-skill calibration analyses. The results show that selective partial mastery can be induced and measured in a structured mathematics setting, although the degree of controllability remains model-dependent. These findings position controllable learner simulation as a distinct research problem at the intersection of teacher education, educational simulation, and language-model control.

arXiv:2603.22459v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enhancing reader engagement while preserving informational fidelity is a central challenge in controllable text generation for news media. Optimizing news headlines for reader engagement is often conflated with clickbait, resulting in exaggerated or misleading phrasing that undermines editorial trust. We frame clickbait not as a separate stylistic category, but as an extreme outcome of disproportionate amplification of otherwise legitimate engagement cues. Based on this view, we formulate headline rewriting as a controllable generation problem, where specific engagement-oriented linguistic attributes are selectively strengthened under explicit constraints on semantic faithfulness and proportional emphasis. We present a guided headline rewriting framework built on a large language model (LLM) that uses the Future Discriminators for Generation (FUDGE) paradigm for inference-time control. The LLM is steered by two auxiliary guide models: (1) a clickbait scoring model that provides negative guidance to suppress excessive stylistic amplification, and (2) an engagement-attribute model that provides positive guidance aligned with target clickability objectives. Both guides are trained on neutral headlines drawn from a curated real-world news corpus. At the same time, clickbait variants are generated synthetically by rewriting these original headlines using an LLM under controlled activation of predefined engagement tactics. By adjusting guidance weights at inference time, the system generates headlines along a continuum from neutral paraphrases to more engaging yet editorially acceptable formulations. The proposed framework provides a principled approach for studying the trade-off between attractiveness, semantic preservation, and clickbait avoidance, and supports responsible LLM-based headline optimization in journalistic settings.