❌

Normal view

  • βœ‡cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
  • General Machine Learning: Theory for Learning Under Variable Regimes Aomar Osmani
    arXiv:2603.23220v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study learning under regime variation, where the learner, its memory state, and the evaluative conditions may evolve over time. This paper is a foundational and structural contribution: its goal is to define the core learning-theoretic objects required for such settings and to establish their first theorem-supporting consequences. The paper develops a regime-varying framework centered on admissible transport, protected-core preservation, an
     

General Machine Learning: Theory for Learning Under Variable Regimes

arXiv:2603.23220v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study learning under regime variation, where the learner, its memory state, and the evaluative conditions may evolve over time. This paper is a foundational and structural contribution: its goal is to define the core learning-theoretic objects required for such settings and to establish their first theorem-supporting consequences. The paper develops a regime-varying framework centered on admissible transport, protected-core preservation, and evaluator-aware learning evolution. It records the immediate closure consequences of admissibility, develops a structural obstruction argument for faithful fixed-ontology reduction in genuinely multi-regime settings, and introduces a protected-stability template together with explicit numerical and symbolic witnesses on controlled subclasses, including convex and deductive settings. It also establishes theorem-layer results on evaluator factorization, morphisms, composition, and partial kernel-level alignment across semantically commensurable layers. A worked two-regime example makes the admissibility certificate, protected evaluative core, and regime-variation cost explicit on a controlled subclass. The symbolic component is deliberately restricted in scope: the paper establishes a first kernel-level compatibility result together with a controlled monotonic deductive witness. The manuscript should therefore be read as introducing a structured learning-theoretic framework for regime-varying learning together with its first theorem-supporting layer, not as a complete quantitative theory of all learning systems.
  • βœ‡cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
  • SMGI: A Structural Theory of General Artificial Intelligence Aomar Osmani
    arXiv:2603.07896v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce SMGI, a structural theory of general artificial intelligence, and recast the foundational problem of learning from the optimization of hypotheses within fixed environments to the controlled evolution of the learning interface itself. We formalize the Structural Model of General Intelligence (SMGI) via a typed meta-model $\theta = (r,\mathcal H,\Pi,\mathcal L,\mathcal E,\mathcal M)$ that treats representational maps, hypothesis spaces,
     

SMGI: A Structural Theory of General Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2603.07896v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce SMGI, a structural theory of general artificial intelligence, and recast the foundational problem of learning from the optimization of hypotheses within fixed environments to the controlled evolution of the learning interface itself. We formalize the Structural Model of General Intelligence (SMGI) via a typed meta-model $\theta = (r,\mathcal H,\Pi,\mathcal L,\mathcal E,\mathcal M)$ that treats representational maps, hypothesis spaces, structural priors, multi-regime evaluators, and memory operators as explicitly typed, dynamic components. By enforcing a strict mathematical separation between this structural ontology ($\theta$) and its induced behavioral semantics ($T_\theta$), we define general artificial intelligence as a class of admissible coupled dynamics $(\theta, T_\theta)$ satisfying four obligations: structural closure under typed transformations, dynamical stability under certified evolution, bounded statistical capacity, and evaluative invariance across regime shifts. We prove a structural generalization bound that links sequential PAC-Bayes analysis and Lyapunov stability, providing sufficient conditions for capacity control and bounded drift under admissible task transformations. Furthermore, we establish a strict structural inclusion theorem demonstrating that classical empirical risk minimization, reinforcement learning, program-prior models (Solomonoff-style), and modern frontier agentic pipelines operate as structurally restricted instances of SMGI.
❌