Front Immunol. 2026 May 8;17:1780459. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1780459. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have transformed the management of advanced lung cancer, yet most patients experience primary resistance, hyperprogressive disease (HPD), or clinically significant immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Multi-omics technologies now enable integrated interrogation of tumor, microenvironmental, host, and clinical determinants of these divergent outcomes. In this review, we first discuss the biological and clinical foundations of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer, and summarize the spectrum of resistance, HPD, and irAEs observed in trials and real-world practice. We then describe multi-omics study frameworks that connect genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, radiomics, and microbiome profiling with these outcome phenotypes. Building on this foundation, we synthesize evidence for composite biomarkers of primary and acquired resistance, delineate emerging multi-omics signatures of HPD, and examine host- and tumor-derived multi-omics correlates of organ-specific and systemic irAEs. We further propose an efficacy-risk quadrant framework to guide clinical decision-making when favorable efficacy predictors coexist with elevated risk of severe adverse outcomes, and outline a three-step approach for high-efficacy/high-risk patients: joint probability reporting, multi-omics guided mitigation, and dynamic reassessment. Finally, we evaluate translational strategies that integrate multi-omics scores into baseline risk stratification, dynamic monitoring with attention to technical challenges such as distinguishing true progression from ctDNA pseudoprogression, and biomarker-driven trial design, while assessing the evidence level and translational readiness of candidate assays from retrospective discovery to clinical implementation. A clinical case illustrates how multi-omics can link baseline risk stratification, regimen selection, and longitudinal monitoring into a coherent action plan, while acknowledging that artificial intelligence-driven models remain investigational and real-world application still relies on clinician judgment. Collectively, this review defines how integrated multi-omics biomarkers can be leveraged to predict resistance, HPD, and immune-related toxicity, and to refine patient selection and management during PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in lung cancer.

PMID:42183274 | PMC:PMC13194140 | DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1780459

Front Immunol. 2026 May 8;17:1780459. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1780459. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have transformed the management of advanced lung cancer, yet most patients experience primary resistance, hyperprogressive disease (HPD), or clinically significant immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Multi-omics technologies now enable integrated interrogation of tumor, microenvironmental, host, and clinical determinants of these divergent outcomes. In this review, we first discuss the biological and clinical foundations of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer, and summarize the spectrum of resistance, HPD, and irAEs observed in trials and real-world practice. We then describe multi-omics study frameworks that connect genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, radiomics, and microbiome profiling with these outcome phenotypes. Building on this foundation, we synthesize evidence for composite biomarkers of primary and acquired resistance, delineate emerging multi-omics signatures of HPD, and examine host- and tumor-derived multi-omics correlates of organ-specific and systemic irAEs. We further propose an efficacy-risk quadrant framework to guide clinical decision-making when favorable efficacy predictors coexist with elevated risk of severe adverse outcomes, and outline a three-step approach for high-efficacy/high-risk patients: joint probability reporting, multi-omics guided mitigation, and dynamic reassessment. Finally, we evaluate translational strategies that integrate multi-omics scores into baseline risk stratification, dynamic monitoring with attention to technical challenges such as distinguishing true progression from ctDNA pseudoprogression, and biomarker-driven trial design, while assessing the evidence level and translational readiness of candidate assays from retrospective discovery to clinical implementation. A clinical case illustrates how multi-omics can link baseline risk stratification, regimen selection, and longitudinal monitoring into a coherent action plan, while acknowledging that artificial intelligence-driven models remain investigational and real-world application still relies on clinician judgment. Collectively, this review defines how integrated multi-omics biomarkers can be leveraged to predict resistance, HPD, and immune-related toxicity, and to refine patient selection and management during PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in lung cancer.

PMID:42183274 | PMC:PMC13194140 | DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1780459

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2026 Mar 23;15(3):62. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-1-1477. Epub 2026 Mar 18.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 2025, lung cancer research advanced rapidly across the disease continuum, from population-level risk assessment and screening to mechanistic studies of early carcinogenesis and therapeutic innovation in perioperative and metastatic settings. A key shift moved beyond a smoking-centred paradigm toward a multidimensional risk framework reflecting the growing burden among never-smokers and the roles of air pollution, occupational exposures, and systemic metabolic-inflammatory states. This narrative review aims to synthesize influential 2025 evidence across prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, and to identify convergent themes and translational gaps relevant to clinical practice and policy.

METHODS: We performed a narrative synthesis of influential lung cancer studies published in major international journals in 2025. Evidence was organized along a clinically oriented pathway spanning carcinogenesis and screening, precision diagnosis, treatment optimization in resectable and advanced disease, and survivorship, emphasizing practice-informing trials, high-impact translational research, and implementation-relevant technologies.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Lineage tracing, single-cell and spatial omics, and evolutionary inference refined concepts of field cancerization, clonal selection, and copy-number-driven fitness. In small-cell lung cancer, evidence further supported neuronal coupling and synapse-like programs as potentially tractable vulnerabilities. Clinically, low-dose computed tomography (CT) strategies and data-informed nodule thresholds aimed to balance under-detection against over-surveillance harms. In diagnostics, artificial intelligence (AI) models increasingly inferred molecular features from routine histopathology ("virtual molecular testing") and should be regarded as decision support requiring prospective validation, population calibration, and explicit failure-mode reporting. Multimodal approaches integrating imaging with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) improved feasibility in tissue-limited settings, but clinical utility remains contingent on assay standardization and pathway-level implementation. In resectable disease, longer follow-up consolidated neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for selected patients, while ctDNA kinetics emerged as a candidate biomarker for response-adaptive escalation and de-escalation. In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), phase III evidence for antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies began reshaping sequencing, while highlighting challenges in toxicity, access, affordability, and immature overall survival in several programs.

CONCLUSIONS: The 2025 landscape reflects coordinated progress in risk conceptualization, biology, diagnostics, and therapeutics, yet gaps in validation, standardization, and real-world deliverability persist. Priorities include prospective evaluation of AI- and ctDNA-enabled pathways, toxicity-informed sequencing, and equitable implementation aligned with health-system capacity.

PMID:41982682 | PMC:PMC13071762 | DOI:10.21037/tlcr-2025-1-1477

Clin Cancer Res. 2026 Mar 18. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-4153. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Intestinal low-dose irradiation (ILDR) may enhance immunotherapy efficacy by modulating the gut microbiota and metabolism; however, its role in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), particularly in the first-line setting, remains unclear.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This multicenter retrospective and prospective study included mNSCLC patients receiving first- and second-line programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors along with abdominopelvic radiotherapy between 2018 and 2025. Patients were stratified by the mean intestinal radiation dose into <1 Gy, 1-3 Gy, and >3 Gy groups and treatment outcomes were compared. The blood and fecal samples were subjected to multi-omics profiling.

RESULTS: g>309 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Optimal efficacy was observed with a small intestinal mean radiation dose (SIMRD) of 1-3 Gy, showing longer progression-free survival (PFS, 10.2 months) and overall survival (OS, 22.8 months) (P < 0.01), which was consistent across subgroups. Compared with 1-3 Gy, SIMRD >3 Gy (Hazard ratio [HR] = 4.87, P < 0.001) and <1 Gy (HR = 1.85, P < 0.001) independently predicted worse OS. Prospective results confirmed the best disease control rate (P = 0.041) and PFS (P = 0.046) with SIMRD of 1-3 Gy. Responders were enriched in Bacillota, Clostridia, and indole derivatives, particularly indole-3-carboxylic acid. Moreover, the 1-3 Gy group exhibited increased circulating macrophage inflammatory protein-3α and reduced circulating α4β7+ regulatory T cells.

CONCLUSIONS: ILDR influences the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in patients with mNSCLC, particularly when SIMRD is maintained within the 1-3 Gy range, likely through modulation of the gut microbiota-metabolite-immune axis.

PMID:41849236 | DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-4153