Lu and colleagues identify BRD4 as a central epigenetic driver of vesicant-induced corneal injury. Using reproducible mouse and rabbit models, they show that short-term topical BRD4 inhibition suppresses acute inflammation and provides durable protection of corneal clarity, stromal organization, endothelial integrity, and neovascularization, supporting translational therapy for chemical eye injuries.

arXiv:2505.21972v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Given the challenge of automatically evaluating free-form outputs from large language models (LLMs), an increasingly common solution is to use LLMs themselves as the judging mechanism, without any gold-standard scores. Implicitly, this practice accounts for only sampling variability (aleatoric uncertainty) and ignores uncertainty about judge quality (epistemic uncertainty). While this is justified if judges are perfectly accurate, it is unclear when such an approach is theoretically valid and practically robust. We study these questions for the task of ranking LLM candidates from a novel geometric perspective: for $M$-level scoring systems, both LLM judges and candidates can be represented as points on an $(M-1)$-dimensional probability simplex, where geometric concepts (e.g., triangle areas) correspond to key ranking concepts. This perspective yields intuitive theoretical conditions and visual proofs for when rankings are identifiable; for instance, we provide a formal basis for the ``folk wisdom'' that LLM judges are more effective for two-level scoring ($M=2$) than multi-level scoring ($M>2$). Leveraging the simplex, we design geometric Bayesian priors that encode epistemic uncertainty about judge quality and vary the priors to conduct sensitivity analyses. Experiments on LLM benchmarks show that rankings based solely on LLM judges are robust in many but not all datasets, underscoring both their widespread success and the need for caution. Our Bayesian method achieves substantially higher coverage rates than existing procedures, highlighting the importance of modeling epistemic uncertainty.

arXiv:2603.03505v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: State-of-the-art text-to-video (T2V) generators frequently violate physical laws despite high visual quality. We show this stems from insufficient physical constraints in prompts rather than model limitations: manually adding physics details reliably produces physically plausible videos, but requires expertise and does not scale. We present PhyPrompt, a two-stage reinforcement learning framework that automatically refines prompts for physically realistic generation. First, we fine-tune a large language model on a physics-focused Chain-of-Thought dataset to integrate principles like object motion and force interactions while preserving user intent. Second, we apply Group Relative Policy Optimization with a dynamic reward curriculum that initially prioritizes semantic fidelity, then progressively shifts toward physical commonsense. This curriculum achieves synergistic optimization: PhyPrompt-7B reaches 40.8\% joint success on VideoPhy2 (8.6pp gain), improving physical commonsense by 11pp (55.8\% to 66.8\%) while simultaneously increasing semantic adherence by 4.4pp (43.4\% to 47.8\%). Remarkably, our curriculum exceeds single-objective training on both metrics, demonstrating compositional prompt discovery beyond conventional multi-objective trade-offs. PhyPrompt outperforms GPT-4o (+3.8\% joint) and DeepSeek-V3 (+2.2\%, 100$\times$ larger) using only 7B parameters. The approach transfers zero-shot across diverse T2V architectures (Lavie, VideoCrafter2, CogVideoX-5B) with up to 16.8\% improvement, establishing that domain-specialized reinforcement learning with compositional curricula surpasses general-purpose scaling for physics-aware generation.