arXiv:2604.03785v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Communication is essential for coordination in \emph{cooperative} multi-agent reinforcement learning under partial observability, yet \emph{cross-timestep} delays cause messages to arrive multiple timesteps after generation, inducing temporal misalignment and making information stale when consumed. We formalize this setting as a delayed-communication partially observable Markov game (DeComm-POMG) and decompose a message's effect into \emph{communication gain} and \emph{delay cost}, yielding the Communication Gain and Delay Cost (CGDC) metric. We further establish a value-loss bound showing that the degradation induced by delayed messages is upper-bounded by a discounted accumulation of an information gap between the action distributions induced by timely versus delayed messages. Guided by CGDC, we propose \textbf{CDCMA}, an actor--critic framework that requests messages only when predicted CGDC is positive, predicts future observations to reduce misalignment at consumption, and fuses delayed messages via CGDC-guided attention. Experiments on no-teammate-vision variants of Cooperative Navigation and Predator Prey, and on SMAC maps across multiple delay levels show consistent improvements in performance, robustness, and generalization, with ablations validating each component.

arXiv:2602.13562v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While reasoning models have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks, their increasing power necessitates stringent safety measures. For safety alignment, the core challenge lies in the inherent trade-off between safety and utility. However, prevailing alignment strategies typically construct CoT training data with explicit safety rules via context distillation. This approach inadvertently limits reasoning capabilities by creating a rigid association between rule memorization and refusal. To mitigate the safety-utility trade-off, we propose the Adaptive Safe Context Learning (ASCL) framework to improve the reasoning given proper context. ASCL formulates safety alignment as a multi-turn tool-use process, empowering the model to autonomously decide when to consult safety rules and how to generate the ongoing reasoning. Furthermore, to counteract the preference for rule consultation during RL, we introduce Inverse Frequency Policy Optimization (IFPO) to rebalance advantage estimates. By decoupling rule retrieval and subsequent reasoning, our method achieves higher overall performance compared to baselines.