arXiv:2603.28784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This Data Descriptor presents a fully open, multi-modal dataset for estimating vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) from consumer-grade Apple Watch sensors with laboratory force plate ground truth. Ten healthy adults aged 26--41 years performed five activities: walking, jogging, running, heel drops, and step drops, while wearing two Apple Watches positioned at the left wrist and waist. The dataset contains 492 validated trials with time-aligned inertial measurement unit (IMU) recordings (approximately 100 Hz) and force plate vGRF (Force\_Z, 1000 Hz). The release includes raw and processed time series, trial-level metadata, quality-control flags, and machine-readable data dictionaries. Trial-level matching manifests link recordings across modalities using stable identifiers. Of the 492 validated trials, 395 are triad-complete, containing wrist, waist, and force plate data, enabling cross-sensor analyses and reproducible model evaluation. Dataset quality is characterised through a three-phase cross-sensor plausibility and consistency framework, repeatability analysis of peak vGRF (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.871--0.990), and systematic checks of force ranges and trial completeness. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis showed that correlation-based validation metrics were robust to single-sample timing perturbations at the IMU sampling resolution. All data are released under CC BY 4.0, with analysis scripts archived alongside the dataset and mirrored on GitHub. This resource supports reproducible research in wearable biomechanics, benchmarking of machine learning models for vGRF estimation, and investigation of sensor placement effects using widely available consumer wearables.

arXiv:2603.29694v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, making early detection critical. AI-driven dermatology systems often rely on skin lesion segmentation as a preprocessing step to delineate the lesion from surrounding skin and support downstream analysis. While fairness concerns regarding skin tone have been widely studied for lesion classification, the influence of skin tone on the segmentation stage remains under-quantified and is frequently assessed using coarse, discrete skin tone categories. In this work, we evaluate three strong segmentation architectures (UNet, DeepLabV3 with a ResNet50 backbone, and DINOv2) on two public dermoscopic datasets (HAM10000 and ISIC2017) and introduce a continuous pigment or contrast analysis that treats pixel-wise ITA values as distributions. Using Wasserstein distances between within-image distributions for skin-only, lesion-only, and whole-image regions, we quantify lesion skin contrast and relate it to segmentation performance across multiple metrics. Within the range represented in these datasets, global skin tone metrics (Fitzpatrick grouping or mean ITA) show weak association with segmentation quality. In contrast, low lesion-skin contrast is consistently associated with larger segmentation errors in models, indicating that boundary ambiguity and low contrast are key drivers of failure. These findings suggest that fairness improvements in dermoscopic segmentation should prioritize robust handling of low-contrast lesions, and the distribution-based pigment measures provide a more informative audit signal than discrete skin-tone categories.