Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2026 Mar 23;15(3):62. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-1-1477. Epub 2026 Mar 18.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 2025, lung cancer research advanced rapidly across the disease continuum, from population-level risk assessment and screening to mechanistic studies of early carcinogenesis and therapeutic innovation in perioperative and metastatic settings. A key shift moved beyond a smoking-centred paradigm toward a multidimensional risk framework reflecting the growing burden among never-smokers and the roles of air pollution, occupational exposures, and systemic metabolic-inflammatory states. This narrative review aims to synthesize influential 2025 evidence across prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, and to identify convergent themes and translational gaps relevant to clinical practice and policy.

METHODS: We performed a narrative synthesis of influential lung cancer studies published in major international journals in 2025. Evidence was organized along a clinically oriented pathway spanning carcinogenesis and screening, precision diagnosis, treatment optimization in resectable and advanced disease, and survivorship, emphasizing practice-informing trials, high-impact translational research, and implementation-relevant technologies.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Lineage tracing, single-cell and spatial omics, and evolutionary inference refined concepts of field cancerization, clonal selection, and copy-number-driven fitness. In small-cell lung cancer, evidence further supported neuronal coupling and synapse-like programs as potentially tractable vulnerabilities. Clinically, low-dose computed tomography (CT) strategies and data-informed nodule thresholds aimed to balance under-detection against over-surveillance harms. In diagnostics, artificial intelligence (AI) models increasingly inferred molecular features from routine histopathology ("virtual molecular testing") and should be regarded as decision support requiring prospective validation, population calibration, and explicit failure-mode reporting. Multimodal approaches integrating imaging with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) improved feasibility in tissue-limited settings, but clinical utility remains contingent on assay standardization and pathway-level implementation. In resectable disease, longer follow-up consolidated neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for selected patients, while ctDNA kinetics emerged as a candidate biomarker for response-adaptive escalation and de-escalation. In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), phase III evidence for antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies began reshaping sequencing, while highlighting challenges in toxicity, access, affordability, and immature overall survival in several programs.

CONCLUSIONS: The 2025 landscape reflects coordinated progress in risk conceptualization, biology, diagnostics, and therapeutics, yet gaps in validation, standardization, and real-world deliverability persist. Priorities include prospective evaluation of AI- and ctDNA-enabled pathways, toxicity-informed sequencing, and equitable implementation aligned with health-system capacity.

PMID:41982682 | PMC:PMC13071762 | DOI:10.21037/tlcr-2025-1-1477

NPJ Precis Oncol. 2026 Apr 15. doi: 10.1038/s41698-026-01416-y. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Detecting lung cancer effectively in the general population is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and improving the 5-year survival rate. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is the current standard, it has limitations in broader populations. We developed a blood-based multi-omics model using whole-genome cell-free DNA (cfDNA) features to distinguish lung cancer from non-cancer individuals. This study included 1600 patients and an equal number of non-cancer controls, divided into training and validation cohorts. The model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 95.59% for the training cohort and 95.74% for the validation cohort. The model consistently performed well across various cancer stages and histological subtypes. To further validate the performance of the model, an external validation cohort was utilized. Notably, it also effectively differentiated non-cancer samples from cancer samples in the external validation cohort, with 85.9% sensitivity and 94.78% specificity. Importantly, in simulated population screenings, our ctDNA assay outperformed both LDCT and a previously established method. This suggests its potential utility in wider lung cancer screening programs, possibly complementing the LDCT approach. In conclusion, our ctDNA assay emerges as a promising and highly sensitive tool for the early detection and categorization of lung cancer.

PMID:41986614 | DOI:10.1038/s41698-026-01416-y