J Thorac Dis. 2026 Aug 31;18(8):950. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2026-1704. Epub 2026 Aug 28.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, two primary systems have been employed for staging small cell lung cancer (SCLC): the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALG) system and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system. The term "limited disease" is defined differently: VALG characterizes it as disease encompassed within a single tolerable radiation field, while IASLC defines it as the lack of distant metastases (M0). Patients with N3 disease frequently satisfy VALG extensive-stage (ES) criteria while meeting IASLC limited-stage (LS) criteria, resulting in a notable staging discrepancy. Therefore, this review aims to clarify the clinical challenges posed by this staging overlap and provide insights for standardizing staging terminology and optimizing therapeutic decision-making in N3 SCLC.

METHODS: A narrative review utilizing a systematized search strategy was conducted. While strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines was not pursued because the extensive heterogeneity of the literature precluded a formal meta-analysis, rigorous search criteria were applied to minimize selection bias. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for literature from January 2000 to March 2026. Studies examining stage N3 SCLC, spatial metastatic burden, and definitional inconsistencies between the VALG and IASLC staging systems were analyzed to assess their effects on treatment dosimetry, systemic therapy, and survival outcomes.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The staging overlap in N3 SCLC leads to heterogeneous clinical management depending on its spatial metastatic burden, and this highly variable cohort can be stratified into distinct prognostic subgroups based on the anatomical distribution (single-region vs. multi-region) of the involved lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings should guide clinical trial design and terminology. Clinical decision-making must transcend historical paradigms and technical constraints. Future strategies must incorporate spatial evaluations of metastatic burden alongside innovative multimodal tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and multi-omics, to facilitate tailored therapy for SCLC.

PMID:42724560 | PMC:PMC13559235 | DOI:10.21037/jtd-2026-1704

Biofactors. 2026 Sep-Oct;52(5):e70150. doi: 10.1002/biof.70150.

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal malignancies, including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, remain major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies, its efficacy in gastrointestinal solid tumors remains limited by antigen heterogeneity, insufficient trafficking and infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, on-target off-tumor toxicity, and adaptive resistance. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of CAR-T therapy in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer, with a focus on representative target antigens and emerging biomarker strategies. We further discuss two major categories of biomarkers: target antigen-related biomarkers and conventional dynamic biomarkers, including serum tumor markers, cytokine changes, CAR-T expansion kinetics, and antigen-loss monitoring. In addition, we highlight how single-cell ribonucleic acid sequencing and spatial transcriptomics provide complementary insights into cellular states, immune exhaustion, stromal barriers, and spatially restricted immune exclusion. By integrating these multi-omics approaches with biomarker-guided patient stratification and next-generation CAR-T engineering, gastrointestinal solid tumor CAR-T therapy may evolve from empirical optimization toward mechanism-driven and precision-guided clinical translation.

PMID:42717494 | PMC:PMC13558850 | DOI:10.1002/biof.70150

J Thorac Dis. 2026 Aug 31;18(8):950. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2026-1704. Epub 2026 Aug 28.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, two primary systems have been employed for staging small cell lung cancer (SCLC): the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALG) system and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system. The term "limited disease" is defined differently: VALG characterizes it as disease encompassed within a single tolerable radiation field, while IASLC defines it as the lack of distant metastases (M0). Patients with N3 disease frequently satisfy VALG extensive-stage (ES) criteria while meeting IASLC limited-stage (LS) criteria, resulting in a notable staging discrepancy. Therefore, this review aims to clarify the clinical challenges posed by this staging overlap and provide insights for standardizing staging terminology and optimizing therapeutic decision-making in N3 SCLC.

METHODS: A narrative review utilizing a systematized search strategy was conducted. While strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines was not pursued because the extensive heterogeneity of the literature precluded a formal meta-analysis, rigorous search criteria were applied to minimize selection bias. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for literature from January 2000 to March 2026. Studies examining stage N3 SCLC, spatial metastatic burden, and definitional inconsistencies between the VALG and IASLC staging systems were analyzed to assess their effects on treatment dosimetry, systemic therapy, and survival outcomes.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The staging overlap in N3 SCLC leads to heterogeneous clinical management depending on its spatial metastatic burden, and this highly variable cohort can be stratified into distinct prognostic subgroups based on the anatomical distribution (single-region vs. multi-region) of the involved lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings should guide clinical trial design and terminology. Clinical decision-making must transcend historical paradigms and technical constraints. Future strategies must incorporate spatial evaluations of metastatic burden alongside innovative multimodal tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and multi-omics, to facilitate tailored therapy for SCLC.

PMID:42724560 | PMC:PMC13559235 | DOI:10.21037/jtd-2026-1704

Biofactors. 2026 Sep-Oct;52(5):e70150. doi: 10.1002/biof.70150.

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal malignancies, including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, remain major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies, its efficacy in gastrointestinal solid tumors remains limited by antigen heterogeneity, insufficient trafficking and infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, on-target off-tumor toxicity, and adaptive resistance. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of CAR-T therapy in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer, with a focus on representative target antigens and emerging biomarker strategies. We further discuss two major categories of biomarkers: target antigen-related biomarkers and conventional dynamic biomarkers, including serum tumor markers, cytokine changes, CAR-T expansion kinetics, and antigen-loss monitoring. In addition, we highlight how single-cell ribonucleic acid sequencing and spatial transcriptomics provide complementary insights into cellular states, immune exhaustion, stromal barriers, and spatially restricted immune exclusion. By integrating these multi-omics approaches with biomarker-guided patient stratification and next-generation CAR-T engineering, gastrointestinal solid tumor CAR-T therapy may evolve from empirical optimization toward mechanism-driven and precision-guided clinical translation.

PMID:42717494 | PMC:PMC13558850 | DOI:10.1002/biof.70150

Biofactors. 2026 Sep-Oct;52(5):e70150. doi: 10.1002/biof.70150.

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal malignancies, including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, remain major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies, its efficacy in gastrointestinal solid tumors remains limited by antigen heterogeneity, insufficient trafficking and infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, on-target off-tumor toxicity, and adaptive resistance. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of CAR-T therapy in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer, with a focus on representative target antigens and emerging biomarker strategies. We further discuss two major categories of biomarkers: target antigen-related biomarkers and conventional dynamic biomarkers, including serum tumor markers, cytokine changes, CAR-T expansion kinetics, and antigen-loss monitoring. In addition, we highlight how single-cell ribonucleic acid sequencing and spatial transcriptomics provide complementary insights into cellular states, immune exhaustion, stromal barriers, and spatially restricted immune exclusion. By integrating these multi-omics approaches with biomarker-guided patient stratification and next-generation CAR-T engineering, gastrointestinal solid tumor CAR-T therapy may evolve from empirical optimization toward mechanism-driven and precision-guided clinical translation.

PMID:42717494 | PMC:PMC13558850 | DOI:10.1002/biof.70150

Cell Rep. 2026 Sep 3;45(9):117943. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117943. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Metabolic alterations are increasingly recognized during influenza virus infection, but how local lactate accumulation shapes antiviral immunity remains poorly characterized. By integrating time-series targeted energy metabolomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, flow cytometry, and functional perturbation, we show that influenza virus infection preferentially increases lactate within the lung microenvironment, where it restrains pulmonary CD8⁺ T cell response. Mechanistically, extracellular lactate enters dendritic cells through monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)-dependent transport and induces a tolerogenic-like state marked by impaired maturation, reduced costimulation, and diminished CD8⁺ T cell-priming capacity. Direct experimental evidence identifies H3K18la as a prominent lactate-responsive histone lactylation mark, while multi-omics integration links it to enhancer accessibility and NRF2 pathway activation. Functional studies further show that NRF2 promotes dendritic cell suppression by reinforcing tolerogenic programs and limiting mtROS-dependent XBP1 splicing. Together, these findings reveal a lactate-driven histone lactylation-NRF2 pathway that modulates antiviral immunity during influenza infection.

PMID:42690934 | DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117943

Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2026 Apr 2;75(4):131. doi: 10.1007/s00262-026-04374-3.

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet characterizing the spatial complexity of the tumor immune microenvironment remains a challenge. In this study, we established a comprehensive computational framework integrating multi-omics profiling across 27 cancer types to decode immune-related non-coding RNA regulatory networks. Moving beyond traditional bulk analysis, we utilized spatial transcriptomics to dissect the spatial localization of these regulators. We identified the SNHG6-BIRC5 axis as a critical driver of the "immune-cold" phenotype in lung adenocarcinoma. We provide visual evidence that this axis localizes to tumor nests and negatively correlates with T- cell infiltration, elucidating a mechanism of spatial immune exclusion. Validating the clinical relevance of these findings, genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screening data confirmed the functional essentiality of these targets for cancer cell survival. Furthermore, pharmacogenomic analysis revealed that high expression of this axis correlates with sensitivity to chemotherapy agents like Vinblastine, suggesting a potential stratification strategy for patients with immune-excluded tumors. To expand the clinical utility to immunotherapy prediction, we developed a pan-cancer XGBoost machine learning model incorporating 14 high-performance regulatory features. This model achieved robust performance in distinguishing immunotherapy responders from non-responders with an AUC of 0.771, outperforming traditional markers such as PD-L1. Collectively, this study highlights spatial determinants of immune exclusion and chemotherapy sensitivity- and presents a generalized machine- learning tool for precision immunotherapy stratification. The developed online resource is freely available to facilitate community-wide biomarker discovery.

PMID:41925746 | DOI:10.1007/s00262-026-04374-3

Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2026 Apr 2;75(4):131. doi: 10.1007/s00262-026-04374-3.

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet characterizing the spatial complexity of the tumor immune microenvironment remains a challenge. In this study, we established a comprehensive computational framework integrating multi-omics profiling across 27 cancer types to decode immune-related non-coding RNA regulatory networks. Moving beyond traditional bulk analysis, we utilized spatial transcriptomics to dissect the spatial localization of these regulators. We identified the SNHG6-BIRC5 axis as a critical driver of the "immune-cold" phenotype in lung adenocarcinoma. We provide visual evidence that this axis localizes to tumor nests and negatively correlates with T- cell infiltration, elucidating a mechanism of spatial immune exclusion. Validating the clinical relevance of these findings, genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screening data confirmed the functional essentiality of these targets for cancer cell survival. Furthermore, pharmacogenomic analysis revealed that high expression of this axis correlates with sensitivity to chemotherapy agents like Vinblastine, suggesting a potential stratification strategy for patients with immune-excluded tumors. To expand the clinical utility to immunotherapy prediction, we developed a pan-cancer XGBoost machine learning model incorporating 14 high-performance regulatory features. This model achieved robust performance in distinguishing immunotherapy responders from non-responders with an AUC of 0.771, outperforming traditional markers such as PD-L1. Collectively, this study highlights spatial determinants of immune exclusion and chemotherapy sensitivity- and presents a generalized machine- learning tool for precision immunotherapy stratification. The developed online resource is freely available to facilitate community-wide biomarker discovery.

PMID:41925746 | PMC:PMC13046951 | DOI:10.1007/s00262-026-04374-3