arXiv:2510.15514v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) relies on LLM judges as preference measurement instruments, yet these instruments are fundamentally limited by random measurement errors -- stochastic fluctuations that manifest as preference cycles (e.g., $A \succ B \succ C \succ A$), occurring in 5-9% of evaluations across state-of-the-art models. While repeated sampling mitigates noise by averaging multiple judgments, it treats each comparison in isolation and fails to exploit the structural constraints that distinguish systematic signals from random noise. We introduce Topological Consensus Rewards (TCR), a framework that leverages transitivity as a denoising mechanism via topological majority voting: systematic signals reinforce each other through transitive chains, while random errors cluster into topologically exposed cycles. TCR approximates the Maximum Acyclic Subgraph to filter stochastic noise from preference signals. We also propose Cycle Incidence Rate (CIR) as a diagnostic metric that measures the proportion of samples containing preference cycles. Under our noise model, these cycles arise primarily from stochastic measurement errors rather than genuine intransitivity. Experiments on Arena-Hard, MT-Bench, and WritingBench demonstrate that TCR consistently outperforms pairwise baselines and classical ranking algorithms, while exhibiting robust performance across different judge models.

arXiv:2603.20673v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented language models can retrieve relevant evidence yet still commit to answers before explicitly checking whether the retrieved context supports the conclusion. We present PAVE (Premise-Grounded Answer Validation and Editing), an inference-time validation layer for evidence-grounded question answering. PAVE decomposes retrieved context into question-conditioned atomic facts, drafts an answer, scores how well that draft is supported by the extracted premises, and revises low-support outputs before finalization. The resulting trace makes answer commitment auditable at the level of explicit premises, support scores, and revision decisions. In controlled ablations with a fixed retriever and backbone, PAVE outperforms simpler post-retrieval baselines in two evidence-grounded QA settings, with the largest gain reaching 32.7 accuracy points on a span-grounded benchmark. We view these findings as proof-of-concept evidence that explicit premise extraction plus support-gated revision can strengthen evidence-grounded consistency in retrieval-augmented LLM systems.