❌

Normal view

Distinct multi-omics signatures of clinical subgroups of type 2 diabetes define heterogeneous responses to an insulin sensitizer

Nat Commun. 2026 Aug 29;17(1):10311. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-77187-8.

ABSTRACT

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) subgroups defined by clinical variables differ in disease progression and treatment response. To uncover potential molecular drivers of this heterogeneity, we performed a multi-omics analysis of 826 drug-naïve T2D patients from two phase 3 trials of the insulin sensitizer chiglitazar. Here we show that severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) is characterized by distinct miRNA profiles (e.g., miR-122-5p) correlated with liver injury, and metabolic shifts in amino acids and primary bile acids. Mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD) showed the lowest level of phenylacetylglutamine, a metabolite known to promote cardiovascular disease. Severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD) exhibited high pancreas-specific miR-7-5p, while mild age-related diabetes (MARD) presented the mildest abnormalities. Finally, integrating these multi-omics signatures into machine learning models enhanced prediction of insulin sensitizer efficacy over clinical data alone. Our findings define the distinct molecular signatures of T2D subgroups, facilitating the prediction of heterogeneous treatment responses and supporting personalized clinical management.

PMID:42805981 | PMC:PMC13620142 | DOI:10.1038/s41467-026-77187-8

Ensuring multiomics data reproducibility for artificial intelligence with reference materials as a common calibrator

Nature Biotechnology, Published online: 01 September 2026; doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03267-1

Reference materials should be adopted as a common calibrator for multiomics measurement and co‑profiled with study samples. Multiomics results should be reported as sample‑to‑reference ratios so that they are reproducible and suitable for artificial intelligence tools.

Elo-Evolve: A Co-evolutionary Framework for Language Model Alignment

arXiv:2602.13575v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current alignment methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on compressing vast amounts of human preference data into static, absolute reward functions, leading to data scarcity, noise sensitivity, and training instability. We introduce Elo-Evolve, a co-evolutionary framework that redefines alignment as dynamic multi-agent competition within an adaptive opponent pool. Our approach makes two key innovations: (1) eliminating Bradley-Terry model dependencies by learning directly from binary win/loss outcomes in pairwise competitions, and (2) implementing Elo-orchestrated opponent selection that provides automatic curriculum learning through temperature-controlled sampling. We ground our approach in PAC learning theory, demonstrating that pairwise comparison achieves superior sample complexity and empirically validate a 4.5x noise reduction compared to absolute scoring approaches. Experimentally, we train a Qwen2.5-7B model using our framework with opponents including Qwen2.5-14B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Qwen3-8B models. Results demonstrate a clear performance hierarchy: point-based methods
❌