arXiv:2604.03814v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Camera extrinsic calibration is a fundamental task in computer vision. However, precise relative pose estimation in constrained, highly distorted environments, such as in-cabin automotive monitoring (ICAM), remains challenging. We present InCaRPose, a Transformer-based architecture designed for robust relative pose prediction between image pairs, which can be used for camera extrinsic calibration. By leveraging frozen backbone features such as DINOv3 and a Transformer-based decoder, our model effectively captures the geometric relationship between a reference and a target view. Unlike traditional methods, our approach achieves absolute metric-scale translation within the physically plausible adjustment range of in-cabin camera mounts in a single inference step, which is critical for ICAM, where accurate real-world distances are required for safety-relevant perception. We specifically address the challenges of highly distorted fisheye cameras in automotive interiors by training exclusively on synthetic data. Our model is capable of generalization to real-world cabin environments without relying on the exact same camera intrinsics and additionally achieves competitive performance on the public 7-Scenes dataset. Despite having limited training data, InCaRPose maintains high precision in both rotation and translation, even with a ViT-Small backbone. This enables real-time performance for time-critical inference, such as driver monitoring in supervised autonomous driving. We release our real-world In-Cabin-Pose test dataset consisting of highly distorted vehicle-interior images and our code at https://github.com/felixstillger/InCaRPose.

arXiv:2603.06749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robotic foundation models (RFMs) are emerging as a promising route towards flexible, instruction- and demonstration-driven robot control, however, a critical investigation of their industrial applicability is still lacking. This survey gives an extensive overview over the RFM-landscape and analyses, driven by concrete implications, how industrial domains and use cases shape the requirements of RFMs, with particular focus on collaborative robot platforms, heterogeneous sensing and actuation, edge-computing constraints, and safety-critical operation. We synthesise industrial deployment perspectives into eleven interdependent implications and operationalise them into an assessment framework comprising a catalogue of 149 concrete criteria, spanning both model capabilities and ecosystem requirements. Using this framework, we evaluate 324 manipulation-capable RFMs via 48,276 criterion-level decisions obtained via a conservative LLM-assisted evaluation pipeline, validated against expert judgements. The results indicate that industrial maturity is limited and uneven: even the highest-rated models satisfy only a fraction of criteria and typically exhibit narrow implication-specific peaks rather than integrated coverage. We conclude that progress towards industry-grade RFMs depends less on isolated benchmark successes than on systematic incorporation of safety, real-time feasibility, robust perception, interaction, and cost-effective system integration into auditable deployment stacks.