arXiv:2604.03297v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In the field of Large Language Models (LLMs), Attention Residuals have recently demonstrated that learned, selective aggregation over all preceding layer outputs can outperform fixed residual connections. We propose Cross-Stage Attention Residuals (XAttnRes), a mechanism that maintains a global feature history pool accumulating both encoder and decoder stage outputs. Through lightweight pseudo-query attention, each stage selectively aggregates from all preceding representations. To bridge the gap between the same-dimensional Transformer layers in LLMs and the multi-scale encoder-decoder stages in segmentation networks, XAttnRes introduces spatial alignment and channel projection steps that handle cross-resolution features with negligible overhead. When added to existing segmentation networks, XAttnRes consistently improves performance across four datasets and three imaging modalities. We further observe that XAttnRes alone, even without skip connections, achieves performance on par with the baseline, suggesting that learned aggregation can recover the inter-stage information flow traditionally provided by predetermined connections.

arXiv:2602.19517v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce CFE-Bench (Classroom Final Exam), a multimodal benchmark for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of large language models across more than 20 STEM domains. CFE-Bench is curated from repeatedly used, authentic university homework and exam problems, paired with reference solutions provided by course instructors. CFE-Bench remains challenging for frontier models: the newly released Gemini-3.1-pro-preview achieves 59.69% overall accuracy, while the second-best model, Gemini-3-flash-preview, reaches 55.46%, leaving substantial room for improvement. Beyond aggregate scores, we conduct a diagnostic analysis by decomposing instructor reference solutions into structured reasoning flows. We find that while frontier models often answer intermediate sub-questions correctly, they struggle to reliably derive and maintain correct intermediate states throughout multi-step solutions. We further observe that model-generated solutions typically contain more reasoning steps than instructor solutions, indicating lower step efficiency and a higher risk of error accumulation. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Analogy-AI/CFE_Bench.

arXiv:2602.19517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce \CFE{} (\textbf{C}lassroom \textbf{F}inal \textbf{E}xam), a multimodal benchmark for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of large language models across more than 20 STEM domains. \CFE{} is curated from repeatedly used, authentic university homework and exam problems, together with reference solutions provided by course instructors. \CFE{} presents a significant challenge even for frontier models: the newly released Gemini-3.1-pro-preview achieves an overall accuracy of 59.69\%, while the second-best model, Gemini-3-flash-preview, reaches 55.46\%, leaving considerable room for improvement. Beyond leaderboard results, we perform a diagnostic analysis by decomposing reference solutions into reasoning flows. We find that although frontier models can often answer intermediate sub-questions correctly, they struggle to reliably derive and maintain correct intermediate states throughout multi-step solutions. We further observe that model-generated solutions typically have more reasoning steps than those provided by the instructor, indicating suboptimal step efficiency and a higher risk of error accumulation. The data and code are available at https://github.com/Analogy-AI/CFE_Bench.