❌

Normal view

GraphSkill: Documentation-Guided Hierarchical Retrieval-Augmented Coding for Complex Graph Reasoning

arXiv:2603.06620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing demand for automated graph algorithm reasoning has attracted increasing attention in the large language model (LLM) community. Recent LLM-based graph reasoning methods typically decouple task descriptions from graph data, generate executable code augmented by retrieval from technical documentation, and refine the code through debugging. However, we identify two key limitations in existing approaches: (i) they treat technical documentation as flat text collections and ignore its hierarchical structure, leading to noisy retrieval that degrades code generation quality; and (ii) their debugging mechanisms focus primarily on runtime errors, yet ignore more critical logical errors. To address them, we propose {\method}, an \textit{agentic hierarchical retrieval-augmented coding framework} that exploits the document hierarchy through top-down traversal and early pruning, together with a \textit{self-debugging coding agent} that iteratively refines code using automatically generated small-scale test cases. To enable comprehensive evaluation of complex graph reasoning, we introduce a new dataset, {\dataset}, covering small-scale, large-scale, and composite graph reasoning tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves higher task accuracy and lower inference cost compared to baselines\footnote{The code is available at \href{https://github.com/FairyFali/GraphSkill}{\textcolor{blue}{https://github.com/FairyFali/GraphSkill}}.}.

Compressed-Domain-Aware Online Video Super-Resolution

arXiv:2603.07694v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In bandwidth-limited online video streaming, videos are usually downsampled and compressed. Although recent online video super-resolution (online VSR) approaches achieve promising results, they are still compute-intensive and fall short of real-time processing at higher resolutions, due to complex motion estimation for alignment and redundant processing of consecutive frames. To address these issues, we propose a compressed-domain-aware network (CDA-VSR) for online VSR, which utilizes compressed-domain information, including motion vectors, residual maps, and frame types to balance quality and efficiency. Specifically, we propose a motion-vector-guided deformable alignment module that uses motion vectors for coarse warping and learns only local residual offsets for fine-tuned adjustments, thereby maintaining accuracy while reducing computation. Then, we utilize a residual map gated fusion module to derive spatial weights from residual maps, suppressing mismatched regions and emphasizing reliable details. Further, we design a frame-type-aware reconstruction module for adaptive compute allocation across frame types, balancing accuracy and efficiency. On the REDS4 dataset, our CDA-VSR surpasses the state-of-the-art method TMP, with a maximum PSNR improvement of 0.13 dB while delivering more than double the inference speed. The code will be released at https://github.com/sspBIT/CDA-VSR.

VITA: Vision-to-Action Flow Matching Policy

arXiv:2507.13231v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conventional flow matching and diffusion-based policies sample via iterative denoising from standard noise distributions (e.g., Gaussian), and require conditioning modules to repeatedly incorporate visual information during the generative process, incurring substantial time and memory overhead. To reduce the complexity, we develop VITA, VIsion-To-Action policy, a noise-free and conditioning-free flow matching policy learning framework that directly flows from visual representations to latent actions. Since the source of the flow is visually grounded, VITA eliminates the need for visual conditioning during generation. As expected, bridging vision and action is challenging, because actions are lower-dimensional, less structured, and sparser than visual representations; moreover, flow matching requires the source and target to have the same dimensionality. To overcome this, we introduce an action autoencoder that maps raw actions into a structured latent space aligned with visual latents, trained jointly with flow matching. To further prevent latent action space collapse during end-to-end training, we propose flow latent decoding, which anchors the latent generation process by backpropagating the action reconstruction loss through the flow matching ODE (ordinary differential equation) solving steps. We evaluate VITA on 9 simulation and 5 real-world tasks from ALOHA and Robomimic. VITA achieves 1.5x-2x faster inference compared to conventional methods with conditioning modules, while outperforming or matching state-of-the-art policies. Project page: https://ucd-dare.github.io/VITA/.

Zero-Permission Manipulation: Can We Trust Large Multimodal Model Powered GUI Agents?

arXiv:2601.12349v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large multimodal model powered GUI agents are emerging as high-privilege operators on mobile platforms, entrusted with perceiving screen content and injecting inputs. However, their design operates under the implicit assumption of Visual Atomicity: that the UI state remains invariant between observation and action. We demonstrate that this assumption is fundamentally invalid in Android, creating a critical attack surface. We present Action Rebinding, a novel attack that allows a seemingly-benign app with zero dangerous permissions to rebind an agent's execution. By exploiting the inevitable observation-to-action gap inherent in the agent's reasoning pipeline, the attacker triggers foreground transitions to rebind the agent's planned action toward the target app. We weaponize the agent's task-recovery logic and Android's UI state preservation to orchestrate programmable, multi-step attack chains. Furthermore, we introduce an Intent Alignment Strategy (IAS) that manipulates the agent's reasoning process to rationalize UI states, enabling it to bypass verification gates (e.g., confirmation dialogs) that would otherwise be rejected. We evaluate Action Rebinding Attacks on six widely-used Android GUI agents across 15 tasks. Our results demonstrate a 100% success rate for atomic action rebinding and the ability to reliably orchestrate multi-step attack chains. With IAS, the success rate in bypassing verification gates increases (from 0% to up to 100%). Notably, the attacker application requires no sensitive permissions and contains no privileged API calls, achieving a 0% detection rate across malware scanners (e.g., VirusTotal). Our findings reveal a fundamental architectural flaw in current agent-OS integration and provide critical insights for the secure design of future agent systems. To access experimental logs and demonstration videos, please contact yi_qian@smail.nju.edu.cn.

OptiRepair: Closed-Loop Diagnosis and Repair of Supply Chain Optimization Models with LLM Agents

arXiv:2602.19439v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Problem Definition. Supply chain optimization models frequently become infeasible because of modeling errors. Diagnosis and repair require scarce OR expertise: analysts must interpret solver diagnostics, trace root causes across echelons, and fix formulations without sacrificing operational soundness. Whether AI agents can perform this task remains untested. Methodology/Results. OptiRepair splits this task into a domain-agnostic feasibility phase (iterative IIS-guided repair of any LP) and a domain-specific validation phase (five rationality checks grounded in inventory theory). We test 22 API models from 7 families on 976 multi-echelon supply chain problems and train two 8B-parameter models using self-taught reasoning with solver-verified rewards. The trained models reach 81.7% Rational Recovery Rate (RRR) -- the fraction of problems resolved to both feasibility and operational rationality -- versus 42.2% for the best API model and 21.3% on average. The gap concentrates in Phase 1 repair: API models average 27.6% recovery rate versus 97.2% for trained models. Managerial Implications. Two gaps separate current AI from reliable model repair: solver interaction (API models restore only 27.6% of infeasible formulations) and operational rationale (roughly one in four feasible repairs violate supply chain theory). Each requires a different intervention: solver interaction responds to targeted training; operational rationale requires explicit specification as solver-verifiable checks. For organizations adopting AI in operational planning, formalizing what "rational" means in their context is the higher-return investment.
❌