❌

Normal view

Received — 14 March 2026 ⏭

Multi-Omics Characterization of Lactate-Associated Molecular Subtypes in Lung Cancer Suggests a Role for DKK1 in Lactate-Linked Migration, Invasion, and Lactylation Programs

✇(Multiomics OR Omics) AND (Lung OR gastric OR Hepatocellular)
By: Hang Yu · Xiao-Bin An · Jin-Cheng Xu · Zhen Zhang · Long-Kai Yang · Long Qin · Qing-Sui Li · Chen-Hong Li · Xu Su · Dan Yang · Ning Wang · Jun-Nan Guo
14 March 2026 at 18:00

Cancers (Basel). 2026 Feb 25;18(5):735. doi: 10.3390/cancers18050735.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lactate accumulation is increasingly recognized as a feature of tumor metabolic reprogramming that can coincide with immune dysregulation and aggressive phenotypes. The prognostic and immunologic relevance of lactate-associated heterogeneity in lung cancer remains to be clarified.

METHODS: We curated lactate-related genes and identified prognostic candidates in lung cancer cohorts. Consensus clustering was applied to define lactate-associated molecular subtypes, followed by characterization of survival and tumor microenvironment features. A LASSO-based gene signature was developed to generate an individual-level risk score and an integrated nomogram. Multi-omics analyses were used to evaluate concordance between transcriptomic and proteomic alterations. Single-cell transcriptomic data were analyzed to explore cellular heterogeneity in lactate-related programs. In vitro assays evaluated the response of candidate genes to lactate exposure and assessed cell migration and invasion under proliferation-inhibited conditions after genetic perturbation.

RESULTS: Two lactate-associated molecular subtypes were identified with distinct overall survival and divergent immune microenvironment features. Subtype 1 was associated with better outcomes and a more immune-inflamed profile, whereas Subtype 2 was associated with poorer outcomes and a myeloid-enriched, immunosuppressive contexture. Pathway analyses indicated subtype-associated differences in extracellular matrix-related processes and apoptosis-associated signaling. We developed an 11-gene prognostic signature and nomogram that stratified patients by risk across TCGA and GEO cohorts. Multi-omics integration highlighted ANLN, FGA, and DKK1 as consistently dysregulated at both transcript and protein levels. Among these candidates, DKK1 showed lactate-responsive induction in vitro. DKK1 perturbation altered lactate-enhanced migratory and invasive phenotypes and was accompanied by changes in intracellular lactate levels and global protein lactylation, supporting a potential feedforward relationship between lactate exposure, DKK1 expression, and lactylation.

CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes lactate-associated molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer and provides a lactate-related subtype framework and prognostic risk model for patient stratification. The findings nominate DKK1 as a lactate-responsive candidate linked to migration/invasion phenotypes and lactate/lactylation changes in vitro.

PMID:41827671 | PMC:PMC12985219 | DOI:10.3390/cancers18050735

Multi-Omics Characterization of Lactate-Associated Molecular Subtypes in Lung Cancer Suggests a Role for DKK1 in Lactate-Linked Migration, Invasion, and Lactylation Programs

✇Omics In Lung
By: Hang Yu · Xiao-Bin An · Jin-Cheng Xu · Zhen Zhang · Long-Kai Yang · Long Qin · Qing-Sui Li · Chen-Hong Li · Xu Su · Dan Yang · Ning Wang · Jun-Nan Guo
14 March 2026 at 18:00

Cancers (Basel). 2026 Feb 25;18(5):735. doi: 10.3390/cancers18050735.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lactate accumulation is increasingly recognized as a feature of tumor metabolic reprogramming that can coincide with immune dysregulation and aggressive phenotypes. The prognostic and immunologic relevance of lactate-associated heterogeneity in lung cancer remains to be clarified.

METHODS: We curated lactate-related genes and identified prognostic candidates in lung cancer cohorts. Consensus clustering was applied to define lactate-associated molecular subtypes, followed by characterization of survival and tumor microenvironment features. A LASSO-based gene signature was developed to generate an individual-level risk score and an integrated nomogram. Multi-omics analyses were used to evaluate concordance between transcriptomic and proteomic alterations. Single-cell transcriptomic data were analyzed to explore cellular heterogeneity in lactate-related programs. In vitro assays evaluated the response of candidate genes to lactate exposure and assessed cell migration and invasion under proliferation-inhibited conditions after genetic perturbation.

RESULTS: Two lactate-associated molecular subtypes were identified with distinct overall survival and divergent immune microenvironment features. Subtype 1 was associated with better outcomes and a more immune-inflamed profile, whereas Subtype 2 was associated with poorer outcomes and a myeloid-enriched, immunosuppressive contexture. Pathway analyses indicated subtype-associated differences in extracellular matrix-related processes and apoptosis-associated signaling. We developed an 11-gene prognostic signature and nomogram that stratified patients by risk across TCGA and GEO cohorts. Multi-omics integration highlighted ANLN, FGA, and DKK1 as consistently dysregulated at both transcript and protein levels. Among these candidates, DKK1 showed lactate-responsive induction in vitro. DKK1 perturbation altered lactate-enhanced migratory and invasive phenotypes and was accompanied by changes in intracellular lactate levels and global protein lactylation, supporting a potential feedforward relationship between lactate exposure, DKK1 expression, and lactylation.

CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes lactate-associated molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer and provides a lactate-related subtype framework and prognostic risk model for patient stratification. The findings nominate DKK1 as a lactate-responsive candidate linked to migration/invasion phenotypes and lactate/lactylation changes in vitro.

PMID:41827671 | PMC:PMC12985219 | DOI:10.3390/cancers18050735

CDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward Modeling

✇cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
By: Dengcan Liu · Fengkai Yang · Xiaohan Wang · Shurui Yan · Jiajun Chai · Jiahao Li · Yikun Ban · Zhendong Mao · Wei Lin · Guojun Yin
10 March 2026 at 12:00
arXiv:2603.08035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward modeling is essential for aligning Large Language Models(LLMs) with human preferences, yet conventional reward models suffer from poor interpretability and heavy reliance on costly expert annotations. While recent rubric-based approaches enhance evaluation transparency, they lack systematic quality control, yielding noisy and redundant criteria, failing to mitigate persistent biases (e.g., verbosity, position) in LLM evaluators, and creating a scalability-reliability trade-off. To address these limitations, we propose CDRRM (Contrast-Driven Rubric Reward Model), a framework built on a novel Contrast-then-Synthesis paradigm for high-quality rubric generation and guided preference judgment. CDRRM first conducts multi-dimensional contrastive profiling on preference pairs to identify causal discriminative factors, then synthesizes these insights into compact, context-aware rubrics to guide preference judg- ments. Extensive experiments on three authoritative benchmarks (RewardBench, RMBench, RMB) demonstrate that CDRRM achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse domains and effectively mitigates aforementioned evaluation biases. Notably, our approach delivers exceptional data efficiency: training the rubric generator on only 3k high-quality samples empowers a frozen pre-trained judge model to outperform fully fine-tuned baselines. This work offers a scalable, interpretable, and data-efficient path for reward modeling.
There are no more articles
❌