arXiv:2603.07648v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown promising potential for robotic manipulation tasks. However, real-world robotic tasks often involve long-horizon, multi-step problem-solving and require generalization for continual skill acquisition, extending beyond single actions or skills. These challenges present significant barriers for existing VLA models, which use monolithic action decoders trained on aggregated data, resulting in poor scalability. To address these challenges, we propose AtomicVLA, a unified planning-and-execution framework that jointly generates task-level plans, atomic skill abstractions, and fine-grained actions. AtomicVLA constructs a scalable atomic skill library through a Skill-Guided Mixture-of-Experts (SG-MoE), where each expert specializes in mastering generic yet precise atomic skills. Furthermore, we introduce a flexible routing encoder that automatically assigns dedicated atomic experts to new skills, enabling continual learning. We validate our approach through extensive experiments. In simulation, AtomicVLA outperforms $\pi_{0}$ by 2.4\% on LIBERO, 10\% on LIBERO-LONG, and outperforms $\pi_{0}$ and $\pi_{0.5}$ by 0.22 and 0.25 in average task length on CALVIN. Additionally, our AtomicVLA consistently surpasses baselines by 18.3\% and 21\% in real-world long-horizon tasks and continual learning. These results highlight the effectiveness of atomic skill abstraction and dynamic expert composition for long-horizon and lifelong robotic tasks. The project page is \href{https://zhanglk9.github.io/atomicvla-web/}{here}.

arXiv:2602.14135v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Rapidly evolving AI exhibits increasingly strong autonomy and goal-directed capabilities, accompanied by derivative systemic risks that are more unpredictable, difficult to control, and potentially irreversible. However, current AI safety evaluation systems suffer from critical limitations such as restricted risk dimensions and failed frontier risk detection. The lagging safety benchmarks and alignment technologies can hardly address the complex challenges posed by cutting-edge AI models. To bridge this gap, we propose the "ForesightSafety Bench" AI Safety Evaluation Framework, beginning with 7 major Fundamental Safety pillars and progressively extends to advanced Embodied AI Safety, AI4Science Safety, Social and Environmental AI risks, Catastrophic and Existential Risks, as well as 8 critical industrial safety domains, forming a total of 94 refined risk dimensions. To date, the benchmark has accumulated tens of thousands of structured risk data points and assessment results, establishing a widely encompassing, hierarchically clear, and dynamically evolving AI safety evaluation framework. Based on this benchmark, we conduct systematic evaluation and in-depth analysis of over twenty mainstream advanced large models, identifying key risk patterns and their capability boundaries. The safety capability evaluation results reveals the widespread safety vulnerabilities of frontier AI across multiple pillars, particularly focusing on Risky Agentic Autonomy, AI4Science Safety, Embodied AI Safety, Social AI Safety and Catastrophic and Existential Risks. Our benchmark is released at https://github.com/Beijing-AISI/ForesightSafety-Bench. The project website is available at https://foresightsafety-bench.beijing-aisi.ac.cn/.

arXiv:2602.14285v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated scholarly paper review (ASPR) has entered the coexistence phase with traditional peer review, where artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly incorporated into real-world manuscript evaluation. In parallel, research on automated and AI-assisted peer review has proliferated. Despite this momentum, empirical progress remains constrained by several critical limitations in existing datasets. While reviewers routinely evaluate figures, tables, and complex layouts to assess scientific claims, most existing datasets remain overwhelmingly text-centric. This bias is reinforced by a narrow focus on data from computer science venues. Furthermore, these datasets lack precise alignment between reviewer comments and specific manuscript versions, obscuring the iterative relationship between peer review and manuscript evolution. In response, we introduce FMMD, a multimodal and multidisciplinary open peer review dataset curated from F1000Research. The dataset bridges the current gap by integrating manuscript-level visual and structural data with version-specific reviewer reports and editorial decisions. By providing explicit alignment between reviewer comments and the exact article iteration under review, FMMD enables fine-grained analysis of the peer review lifecycle across diverse scientific domains. FMMD supports tasks such as multimodal issue detection and multimodal review comment generation. It provides a comprehensive empirical resource for the development of peer review research.