❌

Normal view

Multimodal Continual Learning with MLLMs from Multi-scenario Perspectives

arXiv:2511.18507v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) deployed on devices must adapt to continuously changing visual scenarios such as variations in background and perspective, to effectively perform complex visual tasks. To investigate catastrophic forgetting under real-world scenario shifts, we construct a multimodal visual understanding dataset (MSVQA), covering four distinct scenarios and perspectives: high-altitude, underwater, low-altitude, and indoor environments. Furthermore, we propose UNIFIER (mUltimodal coNtInual learning with MLLMs From multi-scenarIo pERspectives), a continual learning (CL) framework designed to address visual discrepancies while learning different scenarios. Compared to existing CL methods, UNIFIER enables knowledge accumulation within the same scenario and mutual enhancement across different scenarios via Vision Representation Expansion (VRE) and Vision Consistency Constraint (VCC). Experimental results show that UNIFIER improves the last-step VQA scores by 2.70%~10.62% and the last-step F1 scores by 3.40%~7.69% compared to the state-of-the-art method, QUAD, in 20-step cross-scenario continual learning tasks. MSVQA dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Kaij00/MSVQA.

Silent Inconsistency in Data-Parallel Full Fine-Tuning: Diagnosing Worker-Level Optimization Misalignment

arXiv:2602.14462v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-parallel (DP) training with synchronous all-reduce is a dominant paradigm for full-parameter fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). While parameter synchronization guarantees numerical equivalence of model weights after each iteration, it does not necessarily imply alignment of worker-level optimization dynamics before gradient aggregation. This paper identifies and studies this latent mismatch, termed \emph{silent inconsistency}, where cross-worker divergence in losses and gradients can remain invisible under conventional aggregated monitoring signals. We propose a lightweight, model-agnostic diagnostic framework that quantifies worker-level consistency using training signals readily available in standard pipelines. Specifically, we introduce three complementary metrics: loss dispersion, gradient-norm dispersion, and gradient-direction consistency measured by inter-worker cosine similarity. The proposed metrics incur negligible overhead and require no modification to model architecture, synchronization mechanisms, or optimization algorithms. We validate the framework by fully fine-tuning the 1B-parameter \texttt{openPangu-Embedded-1B-V1.1} model on the \texttt{tatsu-lab/alpaca} dataset using an 8-NPU DP setup, under controlled perturbations of cross-rank stochasticity. Experimental results show that progressively desynchronized data shuffling and random seeds lead to substantial increases in loss/gradient dispersion and reduced directional alignment, despite smooth globally averaged loss curves. These findings demonstrate that the proposed indicators provide actionable visibility into hidden instability modes in large-scale DP fine-tuning, enabling more reliable diagnosis and configuration assessment.
❌