❌

Normal view

Received — 8 April 2026 ⏭

Agentization of Digital Assets for the Agentic Web: Concepts, Techniques, and Benchmark

✇cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
By: Linyao Chen · Bo Huang · Qinlao Zhao · Shuai Shao · Zhi Han · Zicai Cui · Ziheng Zhang · Guangtao Zeng · Wenzheng Tang · Yikun Wang · Yuanjian Zhou · Zimian Peng · Yong Yu · Weiwen Liu · Hiroki Kobayashi · Weinan Zhang
7 April 2026 at 12:00
arXiv:2604.04226v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic Web, as a new paradigm that redefines the internet through autonomous, goal-driven interactions, plays an important role in group intelligence. As the foundational semantic primitives of the Agentic Web, digital assets encapsulate interactive web elements into agents, which expand the capacities and coverage of agents in agentic web. The lack of automated methodologies for agent generation limits the wider usage of digital assets and the advancement of the Agentic Web. In this paper, we first formalize these challenges by strictly defining the A2A-Agentization process, decomposing it into critical stages and identifying key technical hurdles on top of the A2A protocol. Based on this framework, we develop an Agentization Agent to agentize digital assets for the Agentic Web. To rigorously evaluate this capability, we propose A2A-Agentization Bench, the first benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate agentization quality in terms of fidelity and interoperability. Our experiments demonstrate that our approach effectively activates the functional capabilities of digital assets and enables interoperable A2A multi-agent collaboration. We believe this work will further facilitate scalable and standardized integration of digital assets into the Agentic Web ecosystem.
Received — 4 April 2026 ⏭

CORAL: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Evolution for Open-Ended Discovery

✇cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
By: Ao Qu · Han Zheng · Zijian Zhou · Yihao Yan · Yihong Tang · Shao Yong Ong · Fenglu Hong · Kaichen Zhou · Chonghe Jiang · Minwei Kong · Jiacheng Zhu · Xuan Jiang · Sirui Li · Cathy Wu · Bryan Kian Hsiang Low · Jinhua Zhao · Paul Pu Liang
3 April 2026 at 12:00
arXiv:2604.01658v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based evolution is a promising approach for open-ended discovery, where progress requires sustained search and knowledge accumulation. Existing methods still rely heavily on fixed heuristics and hard-coded exploration rules, which limit the autonomy of LLM agents. We present CORAL, the first framework for autonomous multi-agent evolution on open-ended problems. CORAL replaces rigid control with long-running agents that explore, reflect, and collaborate through shared persistent memory, asynchronous multi-agent execution, and heartbeat-based interventions. It also provides practical safeguards, including isolated workspaces, evaluator separation, resource management, and agent session and health management. Evaluated on diverse mathematical, algorithmic, and systems optimization tasks, CORAL sets new state-of-the-art results on 10 tasks, achieving 3-10 times higher improvement rates with far fewer evaluations than fixed evolutionary search baselines across tasks. On Anthropic's kernel engineering task, four co-evolving agents improve the best known score from 1363 to 1103 cycles. Mechanistic analyses further show how these gains arise from knowledge reuse and multi-agent exploration and communication. Together, these results suggest that greater agent autonomy and multi-agent evolution can substantially improve open-ended discovery. Code is available at https://github.com/Human-Agent-Society/CORAL.
Received — 2 April 2026 ⏭

Robust transcriptomic hallmarks targeting intratumor heterogeneity in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

✇(Multiomics OR Omics) AND (Pancreatic)
By: Youpei Lin · Lihua Peng · Haichao Zhao · Penghui Lin · Lv Chen · Zunyun Gong · Jian Lin · Dongbing Liu · Xupeng Yang · Xiangze Song · Mao Zhang · Shuyi Ji · Junhua Rao · Huijuan Luo · Yifei Cheng · Xiaofang Chen · Guohe Song · Hao Hou · Dongning Rao · Tiancheng Zhang · Weiren Liu · Shu Zhang · Gaoyang Xu · Juan Zhang · Liyun Xiao · Yan Liang · Yang Liu · Yuhan Chen · Zhirou Cui · Xiaoying Wang · Jian Zhou · Qiang Gao · Kui Wu · Jia Fan
31 March 2026 at 18:00

Cell Rep Med. 2026 Mar 30:102708. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102708. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) undermines transcriptome-based stratification in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Here, we integrate multi-omics data from multi-region, single-region, and single-cell RNA sequencing cohorts to systematically characterize gene expression ITH. We uncover that immune and stromal heterogeneity are primary drivers of ITH, leading to misclassification of a median 27.8% of tumors by existing subtyping systems. To overcome this, we identify a low-intratumor-heterogeneity/high-intertumor-variability (LIHV) gene set and develop an ITH-insensitive classification system defining five subgroups: inflammatory (SI), metabolic (SII), atypical (SIII-1), immune-silent (SIII-2), and neurodegenerative (SIII-3). These subgroups exhibit distinct clinical outcomes, molecular features, immune landscapes, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. GPRC5A and VTCN1 serve as robust immunohistochemical biomarkers for SI and SIII tumors, while serum CEA and CA19-9 identify inflammatory iCCA. Therapeutically, HSP90 inhibition synergizes with anti-PD1 in inflammatory iCCA, whereas combined anti-PD1 and anti-TIM3 suppresses neurodegenerative iCCA. Collectively, our study provides a robust molecular framework and actionable therapeutic strategies for iCCA.

PMID:41916296 | DOI:10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102708

The Yin and Yang of tertiary lymphoid structures in primary liver cancer

✇Omics in Hepatocellular
By: Hui Liu · Shi Chen · Muzi Cao · Lizhuang Shu · Mufan Ji · Jian Zhou · Jia Fan · Pengxiang Wang · Yunfan Sun
29 March 2026 at 18:00

Cancer Lett. 2026 Mar 27;648:218461. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2026.218461. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) have emerged as key regulators of anti-tumor immunity and biomarkers for immunotherapy response in liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-iCCA). Advances in single-cell and spatial multi-omics technologies have revealed unprecedented complexity in TLSs, challenging the traditional binary classification of TLSs as simply "good" or "bad". Their functional diversity appears to be shaped by spatiotemporal context, cellular composition, and maturation status. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of TLSs in liver cancer, employing the Yin-Yang paradigm to navigate their functional dualism and prognostic contradictions through a detailed analysis of their identification, classification, and spatiotemporal interactions within the TME. Mechanistically, we elucidate how TLS functions are orchestrated by complex interactions between tumor cells, immune cell subsets, stromal components, and systemic factors. Within this framework, key metabolic drivers, notably ATP citrate lyase (ACLY), and signaling axes such as cGAS-STING/mTOR have emerged as pivotal regulators of TLS ontogeny. In addition, we evaluate current preclinical animal models and therapeutic strategies for clinical TLS induction. Furthermore, we have discussed the key unanswered questions in the field, including the three-dimensional architecture of TLSs and the mechanisms by which they establish durable immunological memory independent of the primary tumor. Clinically, TLSs exhibit great promise as prognostic and predictive biomarkers, particularly in the context of immune checkpoint blockade and locoregional therapies. Finally, we identify challenges in standardization, mechanistic understanding, and translational applications, providing directions for future research to harness TLSs for improving liver cancer outcomes.

PMID:41905709 | DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2026.218461

Received — 5 March 2026 ⏭

The Choice of Divergence: A Neglected Key to Mitigating Diversity Collapse in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward

✇cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
By: Long Li · Zhijian Zhou · Jiaran Hao · Jason Klein Liu · Yanting Miao · Wei Pang · Xiaoyu Tan · Wei Chu · Zhe Wang · Shirui Pan · Chao Qu · Yuan Qi
4 March 2026 at 13:00
arXiv:2509.07430v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A central paradox in fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) is the frequent degradation of multi-attempt performance (Pass@k) despite improvements in single-attempt accuracy (Pass@1). This is often accompanied by catastrophic forgetting, where models lose previously acquired skills. While various methods have been proposed, the choice and function of the divergence term have been surprisingly unexamined as a proactive solution. We argue that standard RLVR objectives -- both those using the mode-seeking reverse KL-divergence and those forgoing a divergence term entirely -- lack a crucial mechanism for knowledge retention. The reverse-KL actively accelerates this decay by narrowing the policy, while its absence provides no safeguard against the model drifting from its diverse knowledge base. We propose a fundamental shift in perspective: using the divergence term itself as the solution. Our framework, Diversity-Preserving Hybrid RL (DPH-RL), leverages mass-covering f-divergences (like forward-KL and JS-divergence) to function as a rehearsal mechanism. By continuously referencing the initial policy, this approach forces the model to maintain broad solution coverage. Extensive experiments on math and SQL generation demonstrate that DPH-RL not only resolves the Pass@k degradation but improves both Pass@1 and Pass@k in- and out-of-domain. Additionally, DPH-RL is more training-efficient because it computes f-divergence using generator functions, requiring only sampling from the initial policy and no online reference model. Our work highlights a crucial, overlooked axis for improving RLVR, demonstrating that the proper selection of a divergence measure is a powerful tool for building more general and diverse reasoning models.
Received — 25 February 2026 ⏭

Step 3.5 Flash: Open Frontier-Level Intelligence with 11B Active Parameters

✇cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org
By: Ailin Huang · Ang Li · Aobo Kong · Bin Wang · Binxing Jiao · Bo Dong · Bojun Wang · Boyu Chen · Brian Li · Buyun Ma · Chang Su · Changxin Miao · Changyi Wan · Chao Lou · Chen Hu · Chen Xu · Chenfeng Yu · Chengting Feng · Chengyuan Yao · Chunrui Han · Dan Ma · Dapeng Shi · Daxin Jiang · Dehua Ma · Deshan Sun · Di Qi · Enle Liu · Fajie Zhang · Fanqi Wan · Guanzhe Huang · Gulin Yan · Guoliang Cao · Guopeng Li · Han Cheng · Hangyu Guo · Hanshan Zhang · Hao Nie · Haonan Jia · Haoran Lv · Hebin Zhou · Hekun Lv · Heng Wang · Heung-Yeung Shum · Hongbo Huang · Hongbo Peng · Hongyu Zhou · Hongyuan Wang · Houyong Chen · Huangxi Zhu · Huimin Wu · Huiyong Guo · Jia Wang · Jian Zhou · Jianjian Sun · Jiaoren Wu · Jiaran Zhang · Jiashu Lv · Jiashuo Liu · Jiayi Fu · Jiayu Liu · Jie Cheng · Jie Luo · Jie Yang · Jie Zhou · Jieyi Hou · Jing Bai · Jingcheng Hu · Jingjing Xie · Jingwei Wu · Jingyang Zhang · Jishi Zhou · Junfeng Liu · Junzhe Lin · Ka Man Lo · Kai Liang · Kaibo Liu · Kaijun Tan · Kaiwen Yan · Kaixiang Li · Kang An · Kangheng Lin · Lei Yang · Liang Lv · Liang Zhao · Liangyu Chen · Lieyu Shi · Liguo T
24 February 2026 at 13:00
arXiv:2602.10604v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Step 3.5 Flash, a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model that bridges frontier-level agentic intelligence and computational efficiency. We focus on what matters most when building agents: sharp reasoning and fast, reliable execution. Step 3.5 Flash pairs a 196B-parameter foundation with 11B active parameters for efficient inference. It is optimized with interleaved 3:1 sliding-window/full attention and Multi-Token Prediction (MTP-3) to reduce the latency and cost of multi-round agentic interactions. To reach frontier-level intelligence, we design a scalable reinforcement learning framework that combines verifiable signals with preference feedback, while remaining stable under large-scale off-policy training, enabling consistent self-improvement across mathematics, code, and tool use. Step 3.5 Flash demonstrates strong performance across agent, coding, and math tasks, achieving 85.4% on IMO-AnswerBench, 86.4% on LiveCodeBench-v6 (2024.08-2025.05), 88.2% on tau2-Bench, 69.0% on BrowseComp (with context management), and 51.0% on Terminal-Bench 2.0, comparable to frontier models such as GPT-5.2 xHigh and Gemini 3.0 Pro. By redefining the efficiency frontier, Step 3.5 Flash provides a high-density foundation for deploying sophisticated agents in real-world industrial environments.
There are no more articles
❌