Autonomous closed-loop framework for reproducible perovskite solar cells
Nature, Published online: 14 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10482-y
Autonomous closed-loop framework for reproducible perovskite solar cellsNature, Published online: 14 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10482-y
Autonomous closed-loop framework for reproducible perovskite solar cellsNature, Published online: 01 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10204-4
A set of hydroxy promoters physically mixed with cobalt oxides for syngas to light olefins conversion using Fischer–Tropsch synthesis is shown to boost catalyst performance as well as simplifying the process and increasing sustainability.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2026 Mar 27;222:105305. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105305. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) faces substantial and evolving challenges, driven by its aggressive biology, drug resistance, and the clinical urgency to detect recurrence. The treatment paradigm has undergone a profound transformation, evolving from surgical interventions and molecular targeted agents to the current era dominated by immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly when used in combination with anti-angiogenic drugs or as part of dual-checkpoint blockade regimens, have established a new first-line standard of treatment for advanced HCC, delivering unprecedented survival improvements. Despite this progress, significant obstacles remain, including primary and acquired resistance, variable patient responses, and notably reduced efficacy in specific etiological subgroups. This comprehensive review synthesizes the emerging modalities such as bispecific antibodies, adoptive cell therapies, and innovative rational combinations that integrate systemic immunotherapy with locoregional treatments or novel targeted agents. Furthermore, we delve into the critical search for predictive biomarkers, encompassing liquid biopsy and multi-omics approaches, and dissect the complex cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Finally, we outline future translational directions, emphasizing the expansion of immunotherapy, the development of tailored strategies for therapy-resistant disease, and the imperative move towards a personalized, biomarker-driven treatment framework. This review provides a cohesive overview of the field and charts a roadmap for future research to overcome the current challenges in HCC immunotherapy.
PMID:41905572 | DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105305
J Cancer. 2026 Jan 30;17(3):515-523. doi: 10.7150/jca.127381. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remain a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, largely due to their molecular heterogeneity, complex tumor microenvironment (TME), and variable treatment responses. In recent years, the emergence of spatially resolved omics technologies-encompassing spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics-has revolutionized the ability to interrogate tumor architecture with unprecedented resolution. These methods enable precise mapping of cellular and molecular interactions within intact tissue contexts, thereby uncovering spatially defined niches that influence tumor progression, immune evasion, and therapeutic resistance. In GI malignancies such as colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers, spatial omics have provided critical insights into cancer-stromal-immune crosstalk, identified predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and targeted agents, and guided the development of novel therapeutic strategies. This review synthesizes the latest advances in spatial omics applied to GI oncology over the past five years, with an emphasis on their integration into early diagnosis, treatment stratification, and real-time monitoring of therapeutic efficacy. We also discuss current challenges, including standardization, data integration, and clinical validation, as well as future directions for incorporating spatial profiling into routine oncology practice. By bridging the gap between bench discoveries and bedside applications, spatial omics hold transformative potential for achieving truly personalized treatment in gastrointestinal cancers.
PMID:41869445 | PMC:PMC13003551 | DOI:10.7150/jca.127381
Cancers (Basel). 2026 Feb 25;18(5):735. doi: 10.3390/cancers18050735.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lactate accumulation is increasingly recognized as a feature of tumor metabolic reprogramming that can coincide with immune dysregulation and aggressive phenotypes. The prognostic and immunologic relevance of lactate-associated heterogeneity in lung cancer remains to be clarified.
METHODS: We curated lactate-related genes and identified prognostic candidates in lung cancer cohorts. Consensus clustering was applied to define lactate-associated molecular subtypes, followed by characterization of survival and tumor microenvironment features. A LASSO-based gene signature was developed to generate an individual-level risk score and an integrated nomogram. Multi-omics analyses were used to evaluate concordance between transcriptomic and proteomic alterations. Single-cell transcriptomic data were analyzed to explore cellular heterogeneity in lactate-related programs. In vitro assays evaluated the response of candidate genes to lactate exposure and assessed cell migration and invasion under proliferation-inhibited conditions after genetic perturbation.
RESULTS: Two lactate-associated molecular subtypes were identified with distinct overall survival and divergent immune microenvironment features. Subtype 1 was associated with better outcomes and a more immune-inflamed profile, whereas Subtype 2 was associated with poorer outcomes and a myeloid-enriched, immunosuppressive contexture. Pathway analyses indicated subtype-associated differences in extracellular matrix-related processes and apoptosis-associated signaling. We developed an 11-gene prognostic signature and nomogram that stratified patients by risk across TCGA and GEO cohorts. Multi-omics integration highlighted ANLN, FGA, and DKK1 as consistently dysregulated at both transcript and protein levels. Among these candidates, DKK1 showed lactate-responsive induction in vitro. DKK1 perturbation altered lactate-enhanced migratory and invasive phenotypes and was accompanied by changes in intracellular lactate levels and global protein lactylation, supporting a potential feedforward relationship between lactate exposure, DKK1 expression, and lactylation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes lactate-associated molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer and provides a lactate-related subtype framework and prognostic risk model for patient stratification. The findings nominate DKK1 as a lactate-responsive candidate linked to migration/invasion phenotypes and lactate/lactylation changes in vitro.
PMID:41827671 | PMC:PMC12985219 | DOI:10.3390/cancers18050735
Cancers (Basel). 2026 Feb 25;18(5):735. doi: 10.3390/cancers18050735.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lactate accumulation is increasingly recognized as a feature of tumor metabolic reprogramming that can coincide with immune dysregulation and aggressive phenotypes. The prognostic and immunologic relevance of lactate-associated heterogeneity in lung cancer remains to be clarified.
METHODS: We curated lactate-related genes and identified prognostic candidates in lung cancer cohorts. Consensus clustering was applied to define lactate-associated molecular subtypes, followed by characterization of survival and tumor microenvironment features. A LASSO-based gene signature was developed to generate an individual-level risk score and an integrated nomogram. Multi-omics analyses were used to evaluate concordance between transcriptomic and proteomic alterations. Single-cell transcriptomic data were analyzed to explore cellular heterogeneity in lactate-related programs. In vitro assays evaluated the response of candidate genes to lactate exposure and assessed cell migration and invasion under proliferation-inhibited conditions after genetic perturbation.
RESULTS: Two lactate-associated molecular subtypes were identified with distinct overall survival and divergent immune microenvironment features. Subtype 1 was associated with better outcomes and a more immune-inflamed profile, whereas Subtype 2 was associated with poorer outcomes and a myeloid-enriched, immunosuppressive contexture. Pathway analyses indicated subtype-associated differences in extracellular matrix-related processes and apoptosis-associated signaling. We developed an 11-gene prognostic signature and nomogram that stratified patients by risk across TCGA and GEO cohorts. Multi-omics integration highlighted ANLN, FGA, and DKK1 as consistently dysregulated at both transcript and protein levels. Among these candidates, DKK1 showed lactate-responsive induction in vitro. DKK1 perturbation altered lactate-enhanced migratory and invasive phenotypes and was accompanied by changes in intracellular lactate levels and global protein lactylation, supporting a potential feedforward relationship between lactate exposure, DKK1 expression, and lactylation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes lactate-associated molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer and provides a lactate-related subtype framework and prognostic risk model for patient stratification. The findings nominate DKK1 as a lactate-responsive candidate linked to migration/invasion phenotypes and lactate/lactylation changes in vitro.
PMID:41827671 | PMC:PMC12985219 | DOI:10.3390/cancers18050735