arXiv:2609.09657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing emotional support conversation systems mainly focus on one-on-one seeker-supporter interactions and individual emotional states, leaving interpersonal relations in multi-party scenarios underexplored. In this work, we introduce relation-aware emotional support conversation, a new task that evaluates whether LLMs can capture and utilize the evolving dynamics of relationships to offer more effective emotional support. We construct RESCUE (Relation-aware Emotional Support Conversation Understanding and Evaluation Benchmark) from real couple and family interview conversations, containing 191 samples, 7,079 annotated turns, and 1,064.8 minutes of video. Based on rich annotations of socio-emotional and support-related dynamics, RESCUE defines six tasks that evaluate two core capabilities required for relation-aware emotional support: Relational Understanding and Relation-Sensitive Support. Experiments with ten LLMs show that current models perform relatively well on tasks relying on local emotional or intervention cues, but struggle with relation-intensive tasks such as relation pattern prediction, viewpoint prediction, and support strategy prediction. These findings reveal the limitations of current LLMs in modeling interpersonal relations and making relation-sensitive support decisions.

arXiv:2603.06859v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems powered by large language models (LLMs) are frequently optimized via sparse terminal-only feedback. This shared signal entangles upstream decisions, obstructing accurate decision-level credit assignment. To address this trajectory-level diffusion, we introduce Contextual Counterfactual Credit Assignment (\textbf{\texttt{C3}}). Instead of distributing rewards across an entire episode, \textbf{\texttt{C3}} isolates the causal impact of individual messages by freezing the exact transcript-derived context, evaluating context-matched alternatives via fixed-continuation replay, and applying a leave-one-out (LOO) baseline. This localized intervention extracts unbiased, low-variance marginal advantages for standard policy-gradient optimization. Evaluated across five mathematical and coding benchmarks under matched budgets, \textbf{\texttt{C3}} improves terminal performance over established baselines. Mechanistic diagnostics further show that these gains are accompanied by higher credit fidelity, lower contextual variance, and stronger inter-agent causal dependence. Our code is available at https://github.com/EIT-EAST-Lab/C3.