arXiv:2603.03507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial attacks - input perturbations imperceptible to humans that fool neural networks - remain both a persistent failure mode in machine learning, and a phenomenon with mysterious origins. To shed light, we define and analyze a network's perceptual manifold (PM) for a class concept as the space of all inputs confidently assigned to that class by the network. We find, strikingly, that the dimensionalities of neural network PMs are orders of magnitude higher than those of natural human concepts. Since volume typically grows exponentially with dimension, this suggests exponential misalignment between machines and humans, with exponentially many inputs confidently assigned to concepts by machines but not humans. Furthermore, this provides a natural geometric hypothesis for the origin of adversarial examples: because a network's PM fills such a large region of input space, any input will be very close to any class concept's PM. Our hypothesis thus suggests that adversarial robustness cannot be attained without dimensional alignment of machine and human PMs, and therefore makes strong predictions: both robust accuracy and distance to any PM should be negatively correlated with the PM dimension. We confirmed these predictions across 18 different networks of varying robust accuracy. Crucially, we find even the most robust networks are still exponentially misaligned, and only the few PMs whose dimensionality approaches that of human concepts exhibit alignment to human perception. Our results connect the fields of alignment and adversarial examples, and suggest the curse of high dimensionality of machine PMs is a major impediment to adversarial robustness.

arXiv:2603.03201v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning is the ability to integrate internal states and external inputs in a meaningful and semantically consistent flow. Contemporary machine learning (ML) systems increasingly rely on such sequential reasoning, from language understanding to multi-modal generation, often operating over dictionaries of prototypical patterns reminiscent of associative memory models. Understanding retrieval and sequentiality in associative memory models provides a powerful bridge to gain insight into ML reasoning. While the static retrieval properties of associative memory models are well understood, the theoretical foundations of sequential retrieval and multi-memory integration remain limited, with existing studies largely relying on numerical evidence. This work develops a dynamical theory of sequential reasoning in Hopfield networks. We consider the recently proposed input-driven plasticity (IDP) Hopfield network and analyze a two-timescale architecture coupling fast associative retrieval with slow reasoning dynamics. We derive explicit conditions for self-sustained memory transitions, including gain thresholds, escape times, and collapse regimes. Together, these results provide a principled mathematical account of sequentiality in associative memory models, bridging classical Hopfield dynamics and modern reasoning architectures.

arXiv:2407.01656v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Abstraction is the process of extracting the essential features from raw data while ignoring irrelevant details. It is well known that abstraction emerges with depth in neural networks, where deep layers capture abstract characteristics of data by combining lower level features encoded in shallow layers (e.g. edges). Yet we argue that depth alone is not enough to develop truly abstract representations. We advocate that the level of abstraction crucially depends on how broad the training set is. We address the issue within a renormalisation group approach where a representation is expanded to encompass a broader set of data. We take the unique fixed point of this transformation -- the Hierarchical Feature Model -- as a candidate for a representation which is absolutely abstract. This theoretical picture is tested in numerical experiments based on Deep Belief Networks and auto-encoders trained on data of different breadth. These show that representations in neural networks approach the Hierarchical Feature Model as the data get broader and as depth increases, in agreement with theoretical predictions.