arXiv:2603.08409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although commonly associated with limbless animals like snakes and fish, multi-legged organisms like centipedes also utilize undulatory locomotion. Whether these undulations are actively reinforced or resisted by the axial musculature remains an open question. We present a dynamical model of centipede locomotion that integrates leg-ground interactions, passive body mechanics, and active lateral musculature. By varying stepping rate, actuation, and body stiffness, we examine how locomotor strategies affect speed and an effective energetic efficiency. Coordination emerges only when body stiffness is tuned to stepping frequency: overly flexible bodies lose synchrony, while overly rigid ones move slowly and inefficiently. We make a falsifiable prediction, measurable with a non-invasive experiment, that centipedes utilize speed dependent active stiffness to maintain this coordination. Our results suggest that lateral muscles also have a speed dependent function, revealed by optimizing speed and an effective cost, that resists a phase lag between leg touchdowns and body curvature. Together, we find that centipedes actively modulate body mechanics to achieve rapid, efficient locomotion, highlighting how complex control can emerge from embodied physical properties rather than solely from neural computation.

arXiv:2509.23488v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce benchmark signatures to characterize the capacity demands of LLM benchmarks and their overlaps. Signatures are sets of salient tokens from in-the-wild corpora whose model token perplexity, reflecting training exposure, predicts benchmark performance. We extract them via stepwise forward selection with linear regression in a meta-evaluation spanning 32 LLMs and 89 benchmarks across diverse domains. We then analyze how these signatures relate to both the semantic similarity of benchmark questions and the correlation structure of model performance. While performance correlations are uniformly high and semantic overlaps stay in a narrow mid-range, benchmark signatures reveal more nuanced structure. For instance, they uncover substantial overlap between benchmarks in knowledge and reasoning tasks, whereas benchmarks in culture- and humanity-oriented domains show low similarity with each other. Unlike raw performance correlations, which are influenced by benchmark-orthogonal factors such as question formats, signatures are robust to such confounds. We further identify cross-functional overlaps between logic, math, language, instruction following, and cultural/world modeling, with coding emerging as the most isolated function, interacting only moderately with the ability of detecting missing information. Qualitative analysis shows that only the knowledge signature aligns with actual knowledge, suggesting that LLM semantic organization may differ from human conceptual structure. Together, these findings offer insights into benchmark validity, LLM sensitivities, and the landscape of interconnected LLM capacities. We have open-sourced the code and data in this https://github.com/siyangwu1/Benchmark-Signature-Repository.

arXiv:2503.15904v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet concerns persist regarding their tendency to reflect or amplify social biases. This study introduces a novel evaluation framework to uncover gender biases in LLMs: using free-form storytelling to surface biases embedded within the models. A systematic analysis of ten prominent LLMs shows a consistent pattern of overrepresenting female characters across occupations, likely due to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Paradoxically, despite this overrepresentation, the occupational gender distributions produced by these LLMs align more closely with human stereotypes than with real-world labor data. This highlights the challenge and importance of implementing balanced mitigation measures to promote fairness and prevent the establishment of potentially new biases. We release the prompts and LLM-generated stories at GitHub.

arXiv:2602.23234v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large-scale commercial search systems optimize for relevance to drive successful sessions that help users find what they are looking for. To maximize relevance, we leverage two complementary objectives: behavioral relevance (results users tend to click or download) and textual relevance (a result's semantic fit to the query). A persistent challenge is the scarcity of expert-provided textual relevance labels relative to abundant behavioral relevance labels. We first address this by systematically evaluating LLM configurations, finding that a specialized, fine-tuned model significantly outperforms a much larger pre-trained one in providing highly relevant labels. Using this optimal model as a force multiplier, we generate millions of textual relevance labels to overcome the data scarcity. We show that augmenting our production ranker with these textual relevance labels leads to a significant outward shift of the Pareto frontier: offline NDCG improves for behavioral relevance while simultaneously increasing for textual relevance. These offline gains were validated by a worldwide A/B test on the App Store ranker, which demonstrated a statistically significant +0.24% increase in conversion rate, with the most substantial performance gains occurring in tail queries, where the new textual relevance labels provide a robust signal in the absence of reliable behavioral relevance labels.

arXiv:2603.02420v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pluralistic alignment has emerged as a promising approach for ensuring that large language models (LLMs) faithfully represent the diversity, nuance, and conflict inherent in human values. In this work, we study a high-stakes deployment context - mulching - where automated systems transform selected individuals into nutrient-rich slurry for the dual purposes of food security and aesthetic population management. Building on recent pluralistic alignment frameworks, we introduce ValueMulch, a reproducible training, deployment, and certification pipeline for aligning mulching models (MMs) to a wide range of community norms. Through a real-world testbed spanning 32 communities, we show that ValueMulch improves distributional agreement with community mulching preferences relative to frontier baselines. We conclude with a discussion of ethical considerations, limitations, and implications for researchers seeking to align systems to the full spectrum of human values - especially when those values are inconsistent, commercially inconvenient, or nutritionally underutilized. Author's note: This piece builds on prior existing work Keyes et al in 2019 that satirized cannibalism as a parody for approaches that imbue ethics into problematic technology. We bring those ideas to today's era with the proliferation of large language models in everyday lives, as a critique of current AI pluralistic alignment literature. Our work does not intend to argue that all alignment practices are evil, but rather that if framing value design as a technical problem enables technology systems to enact harms, then perhaps this framing is not enough.