arXiv:2603.22935v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chest X-ray report generation and automated evaluation are limited by poor recognition of low-prevalence abnormalities and inadequate handling of clinically important language, including negation and ambiguity. We develop a clinician-guided framework combining human expertise and large language models for multi-label finding extraction from free-text chest X-ray reports and use it to define Ran Score, a finding-level metric for report evaluation. Using three non-overlapping MIMIC-CXR-EN cohorts from a public chest X-ray dataset and an independent ChestX-CN validation cohort, we optimize prompts, establish radiologist-derived reference labels and evaluate report generation models. The optimized framework improves the macro-averaged score from 0.753 to 0.956 on the MIMIC-CXR-EN development cohort, exceeds the CheXbert benchmark by 15.7 percentage points on directly comparable labels, and shows robust generalization on the ChestX-CN validation cohort. Here we show that clinician-guided prompt optimization improves agreement with a radiologist-derived reference standard and that Ran Score enables finding-level evaluation of report fidelity, particularly for low-prevalence abnormalities.

arXiv:2508.09537v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The growing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their widespread adoption for function completion within code repositories. Recent studies on such tasks show promising results when explicit instructions, often in the form of docstrings, are available to guide the completion. However, in real-world scenarios, clear docstrings are frequently absent. Under such conditions, LLMs typically fail to produce accurate completions. To enable more automated and accurate function completion in such settings, we aim to enable LLMs to accurately infer the developer's intent prior to code completion. Our key insight is that the preceding code, namely the code context before the function to be completed, often contains valuable cues that help the model understand the intended functionality. However, inferring intent from such implicit context is non-trivial and constitutes a core challenge in function-level code completion. To tackle this challenge, inspired by how humans interpret context, we propose a reasoning-based prompting framework that guides LLMs to utilize these contextual cues to infer intent step by step. To incentivize LLMs to reason through the preceding code and infer intent, we further curate a dataset of 40k examples, each annotated with intermediate reasoning traces and corresponding docstrings. Extensive experiments on DevEval and ComplexCodeEval demonstrate consistent performance improvements across multiple models, achieving over 25% relative gains in pass@1 for both DeepSeekCoder and CodeLLaMA families. Building upon our framework, we further develop an intent-interactive platform that supports lightweight human feedback. This platform allows developers to select from a set of candidate intentions or edit the intent to better guide the model. Our experiments show that this interactive approach leads to further performance improvements.