arXiv:2603.29093v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based autonomous agents lack persistent procedural memory: they re-derive solutions from scratch even when structurally identical tasks have been solved before. We present \textbf{APEX-EM}, a non-parametric online learning framework that accumulates, retrieves, and reuses structured procedural plans without modifying model weights. APEX-EM introduces: (1) a \emph{structured experience representation} encoding the full procedural-episodic trace of each execution -- planning steps, artifacts, iteration history with error analysis, and quality scores; (2) a \emph{Plan-Retrieve-Generate-Iterate-Ingest} (PRGII) workflow with Task Verifiers providing multi-dimensional reward signals; and (3) a \emph{dual-outcome Experience Memory} with hybrid retrieval combining semantic search, structural signature matching, and plan DAG traversal -- enabling cross-domain transfer between tasks sharing no lexical overlap but analogous operational structure. Successful experiences serve as positive in-context examples; failures as negative examples with structured error annotations. We evaluate on BigCodeBench~\cite{zhuo2025bigcodebench}, KGQAGen-10k~\cite{zhang2025kgqagen}, and Humanity's Last Exam~\cite{phan2025hle} using Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Opus 4.5. On KGQAGen-10k, APEX-EM achieves 89.6\% accuracy versus 41.3\% without memory (+48.3pp), surpassing the oracle-retrieval upper bound (84.9\%). On BigCodeBench, it reaches 83.3\% SR from a 53.9\% baseline (+29.4pp), exceeding MemRL's~\cite{memrl2025} +11.0pp gain under comparable frozen-backbone conditions (noting backbone differences controlled for in our analysis). On HLE, entity graph retrieval reaches 48.0\% from 25.2\% (+22.8pp). Ablations show component value is task-dependent: rich judge feedback is negligible for code generation but critical for structured queries (+10.3pp), while binary-signal iteration partially compensates for weaker feedback.

arXiv:2603.29651v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Semantic interaction (SI) enables analysts to incorporate their cognitive processes into AI models through direct manipulation of visualizations. While SI frameworks for narrative extraction have been proposed, empirical evaluations of their effectiveness remain limited. This paper presents a user study that evaluates SI for narrative map sensemaking, involving 33 participants under three conditions: a timeline baseline, a basic narrative map, and an interactive narrative map with SI capabilities. The results show that the map-based prototypes yielded more insights than the timeline baseline, with the SI-enabled condition reaching statistical significance and the basic map condition trending in the same direction. The SI-enabled condition showed the highest mean performance; differences between the map conditions were not statistically significant but showed large effect sizes (d > 0.8), suggesting that the study was underpowered to detect them. Qualitative analysis identified two distinct SI approaches-corrective and additive-that enable analysts to impose quality judgments and organizational structure on extracted narratives. We also find that SI users achieved comparable exploration breadth with less parameter manipulation, suggesting that SI serves as an alternative pathway for model refinement. This work provides empirical evidence that map-based representations outperform timelines for narrative sensemaking, along with qualitative insights into how analysts use SI for narrative refinement.

arXiv:2603.29661v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing narrative extraction methods face a trade-off between coherence, interactivity, and multi-storyline support. Narrative Maps supports rich interaction and generates multiple storylines as a byproduct of its coverage constraints, though this comes at the cost of individual path coherence. Narrative Trails achieves high coherence through maximum capacity path optimization but provides no mechanism for user guidance or multiple perspectives. We introduce agenda-based narrative extraction, a method that bridges this gap by integrating large language models into the Narrative Trails pathfinding process to steer storyline construction toward user-specified perspectives. Our approach uses an LLM at each step to rank candidate documents based on their alignment with a given agenda while maintaining narrative coherence. Running the algorithm with different agendas yields different storylines through the same corpus. We evaluated our approach on a news article corpus using LLM judges with Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT 5.1, measuring both coherence and agenda alignment across 64 endpoint pairs and 6 agendas. LLM-driven steering achieves 9.9% higher alignment than keyword matching on semantic agendas (p=0.017), with 13.3% improvement on \textit{Regime Crackdown} specifically (p=0.037), while keyword matching remains competitive on agendas with literal keyword overlap. The coherence cost is minimal: LLM steering reduces coherence by only 2.2% compared to the agenda-agnostic baseline. Counter-agendas that contradict the source material score uniformly low (2.2-2.5) across all methods, confirming that steering cannot fabricate unsupported narratives.

arXiv:2603.29875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: One of the key problems in Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems is that chunk-based retrieval pipelines represent the source chunks as atomic objects, mixing the information contained within such a chunk into a single vector. These vector representations are then fundamentally treated as isolated, independent and self-sufficient, with no attempt to represent possible relations between them. Such an approach has no dedicated mechanisms for handling multi-hop questions. Graph-based RAG systems aimed to ameliorate this problem by modeling information as knowledge-graphs, with entities represented by nodes being connected by robust relations, and forming hierarchical communities. This approach however suffers from its own issues with some of them being: orders of magnitude increased componential complexity in order to create graph-based indices, and reliance on heuristics for performing retrieval. We propose UnWeaver, a novel RAG framework simplifying the idea of GraphRAG. UnWeaver disentangles the contents of the documents into entities which can occur across multiple chunks using an LLM. In the retrieval process entities are used as an intermediate way of recovering original text chunks hence preserving fidelity to the source material. We argue that entity-based decomposition yields a more distilled representation of original information, and additionally serves to reduce noise in the indexing, and generation process.

arXiv:2603.29878v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud systems generate large, heterogeneous log data containing critical infrastructure, application, and security information. Transforming these logs into RDF triples enables their integration into knowledge graphs, improving interpretability, root-cause analysis, and cross-service reasoning beyond what raw logs allow. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising approach to automate RDF knowledge graph generation; however, their effectiveness on complex cloud logs remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we evaluate multiple LLM architectures and prompting strategies for automated RDF extraction using a controlled framework with two pipelines for systematically processing semi-structured log data. The extraction pipeline integrates multiple LLMs to identify relevant entities and relationships, automatically generating subject-predicate-object triples. These outputs are evaluated using a dedicated validation pipeline with both syntactic and semantic metrics to assess accuracy, completeness, and quality. Due to the lack of public ground-truth datasets, we created a reference Log-to-KG dataset from OpenStack logs using manual annotation and ontology-driven methods, enabling objective baseline. Our analysis shows that Few-Shot learning is the most effective strategy, with Llama achieving a 99.35% F1 score and 100% valid RDF output while Qwen, NuExtract, and Gemma also perform well under Few-Shot prompting, with Chain-of-Thought approaches maintaining similar accuracy. One-Shot prompting offers a lighter but effective alternative, while Zero-Shot and advanced strategies such as Tree-of-Thought, Self-Critique, and Generate-Multiple perform substantially worse. These results highlight the importance of contextual examples and prompt design for accurate RDF extraction and reveal model-specific limitations across LLM architectures.

arXiv:2603.29897v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reranking is a critical component in many information retrieval pipelines. Despite remarkable progress in text-only settings, multimodal reranking remains challenging, particularly when the candidate set contains hybrid text and image items. A key difficulty is the modality gap: a text reranker is intrinsically closer to text candidates than to image candidates, leading to biased and suboptimal cross-modal ranking. Vision-language models (VLMs) mitigate this gap through strong cross-modal alignment and have recently been adopted to build multimodal rerankers. However, most VLM-based rerankers encode all candidates as images, and treating text as images introduces substantial computational overhead. Meanwhile, existing open-source multimodal rerankers are typically trained on general-domain data and often underperform in domain-specific scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose UniRank, a VLM-based reranking framework that natively scores and orders hybrid text-image candidates without any modality conversion. Building on this hybrid scoring interface, UniRank provides an end-to-end domain adaptation pipeline that includes: (1) an instruction-tuning stage that learns calibrated cross-modal relevance scoring by mapping label-token likelihoods to a unified scalar score; and (2) a hard-negative-driven preference alignment stage that constructs in-domain pairwise preferences and performs query-level policy optimization through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Extensive experiments on scientific literature retrieval and design patent search demonstrate that UniRank consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, improving Recall@1 by 8.9% and 7.3%, respectively.

arXiv:2603.25152v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems face significant challenges in complex reasoning, multi-hop queries, and domain-specific QA. While existing GraphRAG frameworks have made progress in structural knowledge organization, they still have limitations in cross-industry adaptability, community report integrity, and retrieval performance. This paper proposes UniAI-GraphRAG, an enhanced framework built upon open-source GraphRAG. The framework introduces three core innovations: (1) Ontology-Guided Knowledge Extraction that uses predefined Schema to guide LLMs in accurately identifying domain-specific entities and relations; (2) Multi-Dimensional Community Clustering Strategy that improves community completeness through alignment completion, attribute-based clustering, and multi-hop relationship clustering; (3) Dual-Channel Graph Retrieval Fusion that balances QA accuracy and performance through hybrid graph and community retrieval. Evaluation results on MultiHopRAG benchmark show that UniAI-GraphRAG outperforms mainstream open source solutions (e.g.LightRAG) in comprehensive F1 scores, particularly in inference and temporal queries. The code is available at https://github.com/UnicomAI/wanwu/tree/main/rag/rag_open_source/rag_core/graph.

arXiv:2407.04472v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) present an enormous evolution in the strategic potential of conversational recommender systems (CRS). Yet to date, research has predominantly focused upon technical frameworks to implement LLM-driven CRS, rather than end-user evaluations or strategic implications for firms, particularly from the perspective of a small to medium enterprises (SME) that makeup the bedrock of the global economy. In the current paper, we detail the design of an LLM-driven CRS in an SME setting, and its subsequent performance in the field using both objective system metrics and subjective user evaluations. While doing so, we additionally outline a short-form revised ResQue model for evaluating LLM-driven CRS, enabling replicability in a rapidly evolving field. Our results reveal good system performance from a user experience perspective (85.5% recommendation accuracy) but underscore latency, cost, and quality issues challenging business viability. Notably, with a median cost of $0.04 per interaction and a latency of 5.7s, cost-effectiveness and response time emerge as crucial areas for achieving a more user-friendly and economically viable LLM-driven CRS for SME settings. One major driver of these costs is the use of an advanced LLM as a ranker within the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technique. Our results additionally indicate that relying solely on approaches such as Prompt-based learning with ChatGPT as the underlying LLM makes it challenging to achieve satisfying quality in a production environment. Strategic considerations for SMEs deploying an LLM-driven CRS are outlined, particularly considering trade-offs in the current technical landscape.

arXiv:2510.16635v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Prompt optimization has become a practical way to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) without retraining. However, most existing frameworks treat evaluation as a black box, relying solely on outcome scores without explaining why prompts succeed or fail. Moreover, they involve repetitive trial-and-error refinements that remain implicit, offering limited interpretability or actionable guidance for systematic improvement. In this paper, we propose MA-SAPO: a new Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score Aware Prompt Optimization framework that links evaluation outcomes directly to targeted refinements. Specifically, in the Training Phase, multiple agents interpret evaluation scores, diagnose weaknesses, and generate concrete revision directives, which are stored as reusable reasoning assets. In the Test Phase, an analyzer agent retrieves relevant exemplars and assets for a new prompt, and a refiner agent applies evidence-based edits to improve the prompt and its response. By grounding optimization in structured reasoning, MA-SAPO ensures edits are interpretable, auditable, and controllable. Experiments on the HelpSteer1/2 benchmarks show that our framework consistently outperforms single-pass prompting, retrieval-augmented generation, and prior multi-agent methods across multiple evaluation metrics.

arXiv:2512.05411v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In enterprise settings, efficiently retrieving relevant information from large and complex knowledge bases is essential for operational productivity and informed decision-making. This research presents a systematic empirical framework for metadata enrichment using large language models (LLMs) to enhance document retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Our approach employs a structured pipeline that dynamically generates meaningful metadata for document segments, substantially improving their semantic representations and retrieval accuracy. Through a controlled 3 X 3 experimental matrix, we compare three chunking strategies -- semantic, recursive, and naive -- and evaluate their interactions with three embedding techniques -- content-only, TF-IDF weighted, and prefix-fusion -- isolating the contribution of each component through ablation analysis. The results demonstrate that metadata-enriched approaches consistently outperform content-only baselines, with recursive chunking paired with TF-IDF weighted embeddings yielding 82.5% precision and naive chunking with prefix-fusion achieving the strongest ranking quality (NDCG 0.813). Our evaluation employs cross-encoder reranking for silver-standard ground truth generation, with statistical significance confirmed via Bonferroni-corrected paired t-tests. These findings confirm that metadata enrichment improves vector space organization and retrieval effectiveness while maintaining sub-30 ms P95 latency, providing a quantitative decision framework for deploying high-performance, scalable RAG systems in enterprise settings.

arXiv:2603.19519v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We address a not-widely-recognized subset of exploratory search, where a user sets out on a typically long "search quest" for the perfect wedding dress, overlooked research topic, killer company idea, etc. The first few outputs of current large language models (LLMs) may be helpful but only as a start, since the quest requires learning the search space and evaluating many diverse and creative alternatives along the way. Although LLMs encode an impressive fraction of the world's knowledge, common decoding methods are narrowly optimized for prompts with correct answers and thus return mostly homogeneous and conventional results. Other approaches, including those designed to increase diversity across a small set of answers, start to repeat themselves long before search quest users learn enough to make final choices, or offer a uniform type of "creativity" to every user asking similar questions. We develop a novel, easy-to-implement decoding scheme that induces sustained creativity and diversity in LLMs, producing as many conceptually unique results as desired, even without access to the inner workings of an LLM's vector space. The algorithm unlocks an LLM's vast knowledge, both orthodox and heterodox, well beyond modal decoding paths. With this approach, search quest users can more quickly explore the search space and find satisfying answers.

arXiv:2603.22779v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped with profound semantic knowledge, making them a natural choice for injecting semantic generalization into personalized search systems. However, in practice we find that directly fine-tuning LLMs on industrial personalized tasks (e.g. next item prediction) often yields suboptimal results. We attribute this bottleneck to a critical Knowledge--Action Gap: the inherent conflict between preserving pre-trained semantic knowledge and aligning with specific personalized actions by discriminative objectives. Empirically, action-only training objectives induce Semantic Collapse, such as attention "sinks". This degradation severely cripples the LLM's generalization, failing to bring improvements to personalized search systems. We propose KARMA (Knowledge--Action Regularized Multimodal Alignment), a unified framework that treats semantic reconstruction as a train-only regularizer. KARMA optimizes a next-interest embedding for retrieval (Action) while enforcing semantic decodability (Knowledge) through two complementary objectives: (i) history-conditioned semantic generation, which anchors optimization to the LLM's native next-token distribution, and (ii) embedding-conditioned semantic reconstruction, which constrains the interest embedding to remain semantically recoverable. On Taobao search system, KARMA mitigates semantic collapse (attention-sink analysis) and improves both action metrics and semantic fidelity. In ablations, semantic decodability yields up to +22.5 HR@200. With KARMA, we achieve +0.25 CTR AUC in ranking, +1.86 HR in pre-ranking and +2.51 HR in recalling. Deployed online with low inference overhead at ranking & pre-ranking stage, KARMA drives +0.9% increase in GMV.

arXiv:2603.24750v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Online Health Communities connect patients for peer support, but users face a discovery challenge when they have minimal prior interactions to guide personalization. We study recommendation under extreme interaction sparsity in a survey driven setting where each user provides a 16 dimensional intake vector and each support group has a structured feature profile. We extend Neural Collaborative Filtering architectures, including Matrix Factorization, Multi Layer Perceptron, and NeuMF, with an auxiliary pseudo label objective derived from survey group feature alignment using cosine similarity mapped to [0, 1]. The resulting Pseudo Label NCF learns dual embedding spaces: main embeddings for ranking and pseudo label embeddings for semantic alignment. We evaluate on a dataset of 165 users and 498 support groups using a leave one out protocol that reflects cold start conditions. All pseudo label variants improve ranking performance: MLP improves HR@5 from 2.65% to 5.30%, NeuMF from 4.46% to 5.18%, and MF from 4.58% to 5.42%. Pseudo label embedding spaces also show higher cosine silhouette scores than baseline embeddings, with MF improving from 0.0394 to 0.0684 and NeuMF from 0.0263 to 0.0653. We further observe a negative correlation between embedding separability and ranking accuracy, indicating a trade off between interpretability and performance. These results show that survey derived pseudo labels improve recommendation under extreme sparsity while producing interpretable task specific embedding spaces.