arXiv:2604.03244v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI evaluations have become the primary evidence for deploying generative AI systems across high-stakes domains. However, current evaluation paradigms often exhibit systemic validity failures. These issues, ranging from unjustified design choices to misaligned metrics, remain intractable without a principled framework for gathering validity evidence and conducting granular diagnostic analysis. In this position paper, we argue that item-level AI benchmark data is essential for establishing a rigorous science of AI evaluation. Item-level analysis enables fine-grained diagnostics and principled validation of benchmarks. We substantiate this position by dissecting current validity failures and revisiting evaluation paradigms across computer science and psychometrics. Through illustrative analyses of item properties and latent constructs, we demonstrate the unique insights afforded by item-level data. To catalyze community-wide adoption, we introduce OpenEval, a growing repository of item-level benchmark data designed supporting evidence-centered AI evaluation.

arXiv:2604.04603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this work, we address the problem of cardinality estimation for similarity search in high-dimensional spaces. Our goal is to design a framework that is lightweight, easy to construct, and capable of providing accurate estimates with satisfying online efficiency. We leverage locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) to partition the vector space while preserving distance proximity. Building on this, we adopt the principles of classical multi-probe LSH to adaptively explore neighboring buckets, accounting for distance thresholds of varying magnitudes. To improve online efficiency, we employ progressive sampling to reduce the number of distance computations and utilize asymmetric distance computation in product quantization to accelerate distance calculations in high-dimensional spaces. In addition to handling static datasets, our framework includes updating algorithm designed to efficiently support large-scale dynamic scenarios of data updates.Experiments demonstrate that our methods can accurately estimate the cardinality of similarity queries, yielding satisfying efficiency.

arXiv:2503.14469v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Different attribution scores have been proposed to quantify the relevance of database tuples for query answering in databases; e.g. Causal Responsibility, the Shapley Value, the Banzhaf Power-Index, and the Causal Effect. They have been analyzed in isolation. This work is a first investigation of score alignment depending on the query and the database; i.e. on whether they induce compatible rankings of tuples. We concentrate mostly on causality-based scores; and provide a syntactic dichotomy result for queries: on one side, pairs of scores are always aligned, on the other, they are not always aligned. It turns out that the presence of exogenous tuples makes a crucial difference in this regard.

arXiv:2505.17087v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This chapter explores the evolution, classification, and health implications of food processing, while emphasizing the transformative role of machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI), and data science in advancing food informatics. It begins with a historical overview and a critical review of traditional classification frameworks such as NOVA, Nutri-Score, and SIGA, highlighting their strengths and limitations, particularly the subjectivity and reproducibility challenges that hinder epidemiological research and public policy. To address these issues, the chapter presents novel computational approaches, including FoodProX, a random forest model trained on nutrient composition data to infer processing levels and generate a continuous FPro score. It also explores how large language models like BERT and BioBERT can semantically embed food descriptions and ingredient lists for predictive tasks, even in the presence of missing data. A key contribution of the chapter is a novel case study using the Open Food Facts database, showcasing how multimodal AI models can integrate structured and unstructured data to classify foods at scale, offering a new paradigm for food processing assessment in public health and research.

arXiv:2508.05012v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern LLM pipelines increasingly resemble complex data-centric applications: they retrieve data, correct errors, call external tools, and coordinate interactions between agents. Yet, the central element controlling this entire process -- the prompt -- remains a brittle, opaque string that is entirely disconnected from the surrounding program logic. This disconnect fundamentally limits opportunities for reuse, optimization, and runtime adaptivity. In this paper, we describe our vision and an initial design of SPEAR (Structured Prompt Execution and Adaptive Refinement), a new approach to prompt management that treats prompts as first-class citizens in the execution model. Specifically, SPEAR enables: (1) structured prompt management, with prompts organized into versioned views to support introspection and reasoning about provenance; (2) adaptive prompt refinement, whereby prompts can evolve dynamically during execution based on runtime feedback; and (3) policy-driven control, a mechanism for the specification of automatic prompt refinement logic as when-then rules. By tackling the problem of runtime prompt refinement, SPEAR plays a complementary role in the vast ecosystem of existing prompt optimization frameworks and semantic query processing engines. We describe a number of related optimization opportunities unlocked by the SPEAR model, and our preliminary results demonstrate the strong potential of this approach.