arXiv:2609.09413v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Choosing a recovery process for scale-up requires connecting laboratory results with product requirements, process costs, and scale effects. We analyze records from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's Computer Intelligence for Critical Element Recovery and Optimization (CICERO) workflow for autonomous selective precipitation. Active learning uses prior results to choose experiments. In a conditional retrospective benchmark with fitted models and recycled neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnet records, active learning finds the best recorded result with fewer experiments than nonadaptive space filling. Enrichment is the selected rare-earth-to-iron ratio relative to that in the feed. Adaptive policies reach the recorded enrichment maximum by 16 to 24 wells (individual experiments), versus 48. Our two-stage reconstruction ties two adaptive alternatives at 16 wells. Conditional analyses of recycled samarium-cobalt (SmCo) magnets show a Round 2 tradeoff between purity and nominal yield, the recovery fraction calculated from an assumed starting amount - NdFeB Round 1 routes differ in enrichment. Rankings for produced water from oil and gas extraction depend on phase and dilution assumptions requiring confirmation. We propose choosing batches by their expected reduction in downstream Bayes risk: the minimum expected loss among available process decisions under current beliefs. In exploratory simulations, a hybrid that filters candidates has lower estimated loss than the implemented joint search across routes and conditions. Differences involving the synthetic two-stage policy are small relative to estimation uncertainty. We outline a pre-registered prospective test under a shared loss and logging standard, requiring clarified measurements and records, a defined process decision and relevant outputs, credible economic inputs, and validation at the intended scale.

arXiv:2607.12455v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantitative strategy optimization remains largely manual, requiring domain experts to identify weak signals, tune risk-control rules, and repeatedly validate iterative revisions. Large language models can accelerate this process, but directly relying on them to rewrite trading strategies often introduces hallucinated edits, strategy drift, and backtest overfitting. We propose EVOQUANT, a self-Evolving Verifier-guided framework for strategy Optimization in Quantitative trading. Our method utilizes LLMs to deeply diagnose performance bottlenecks, generates semantically controlled candidate edits, selects the best strategy through a multi-stage verification pipeline, and distills optimization experience into reusable knowledge for continual self-improvement. We evaluate our method using seven representative strategies: four from the A-share market and three from the Crypto market. Experimental results show that our method significantly improves the Sharpe ratio across all tested strategies: the average test Sharpe increases from -0.298 to 0.538, and the best-performing strategy achieves a 199% relative improvement. Ablation studies and stress tests under stricter conditions further validate the effectiveness and robustness of the framework. Overall, this work transforms quantitative strategy optimization from costly manual trial and error into an automated and verifiable iterative paradigm, offering a new path for applying large language models to financial strategy research.

arXiv:2609.04028v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The geometric morphology of deposited filaments can significantly influence the structural performance and stability of 3D concrete-printed (3DCP) structures. However, most finite element (FEM)-based approaches for buildability assessment represent printed layers as simplified rectangles, potentially limiting predictive accuracy. This study proposes a geometry-informed modelling framework that integrates the deep-learning-based filament shape prediction tool ShapeGen3DCP with a layer-activation FEM approach to investigate the effect of realistic filament geometries on buildability. The framework generates geometry-aware numerical models directly from material and process parameters, eliminating the need for experimental filament characterization or computationally intensive fluid-flow simulations. Validation against experimental data and a parametric study of rectilinear walls demonstrate that extrusion parameters and the resulting filament geometry can significantly influence buildability predictions. Realistic filament representations are particularly important for free-flow deposition, whereas layer-pressing strategies are less sensitive to geometric simplifications. Among the investigated representations, an elliptical approximation provides an effective balance between geometric fidelity and modelling simplicity. When rectangular representations are preferred to enable regular computational meshes for faster simulations, defining their dimensions based on volume conservation improves prediction reliability compared with calibrating them using either the maximum filament width or the interlayer contact width. Overall, the proposed methodology demonstrates the importance of incorporating filament geometry into 3DCP simulations and provides practical guidance for selecting efficient and accurate geometric representations for buildability assessment.