Background: Young adults increasingly rely on social media for nutrition information. However, little is known about (1) which types of eating-related content they actively engage with and why, and (2) how they interpret, evaluate, and incorporate this content into their everyday food choices and health behaviors. Objective: This qualitative study explored how UK young adults (aged 18-25 years) interact with food and nutrition content across social media platforms to inform the design of future social media interventions. Methods: Semistructured online interviews, guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior (COM-B) model, were conducted with 25 active social media users (18/25, 72% women, mean age 22.2, SD 1.9 years, ethnically diverse) in the United Kingdom between August and October 2024. The study design was informed by patient and public involvement to ensure relevance and acceptability. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. To guide intervention development, key findings (coded as barriers and facilitators) were systematically mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework, and the COM-B. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Cambridge (24.368). Results: Five key themes were identified: (1) evolving engagement patterns (passive scrolling to active interaction and mixed feelings on algorithmic control), (2) conflicted information seeking (frustration with contradictory advice, varied strategies to assess credibility), (3) multifaceted behavioral impact (simultaneous positive impacts such as cooking inspiration and negative impacts such as restrictive eating triggers), (4) shifting goals (a movement from appearance-focused to health-centered goals; yet, vulnerability to body-image issues), and (5) intervention preferences (demand for credible professionals, customizable content, and privacy protection). Participants demonstrated a reactive learning process, developing “digital nutrition literacy” often after negative experiences. Social influences were identified as the most frequently cited domain (mapped to TDF [theoretical domains framework]/COM-B) shaping interactions with social media content. Conclusions: This study challenges assumptions of passive social media consumption, showing that young adults actively develop protective strategies yet remain vulnerable to misinformation. Digital interventions should leverage user agency and address diverse perceptions through customizable, credible content delivered with privacy and emotionally safe messaging. The COM-B and TDF mapping provide specific, evidence-based behavioral targets, particularly within the domain of Social Opportunity and Reflective Motivation, to guide the development of effective eHealth interventions.

Nature Medicine, Published online: 06 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04282-0

In the phase 3 EMN24 IsKia trial, transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who received isatuximab with carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone pretransplant induction and post-transplant consolidation showed higher rates of measurable residual disease negativity after consolidation than patients who received carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02571-z

Developing psychosocial phenotypes to understand engagement with digital health technologies for heart failure

Nature Medicine, Published online: 03 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04302-z

Exposome analyses across 34 countries showed that social exposures were associated with faster functional brain aging and physical exposures with faster structural brain aging.

Background: Rare diseases affect more than 300 million people globally, and only about 5% have approved therapies. Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) exemplify the diagnostic and long-term care complexity typical of rare diseases, and digital health technologies (DHTs), especially artificial intelligence (AI) and connected care (CC), are emerging tools to support LSD management. Objective: We aimed to map and synthesize peer-reviewed and gray literature from the past decade on DHTs relevant for LSD care, with a primary analytic focus on AI-enabled and CC solutions and a contextual mapping of other enabling DHTs. Evidence distribution was charted by population, care-journey phase, and outcome domains to identify gaps, methodological limitations, and timely priorities relevant for research, clinical practice implementation, and policies. Methods: We conducted a scoping review guided by a population, concept, context framework and operationalized through a Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO)-informed data-charting structure to map study characteristics and reported outcomes, without causal or effectiveness assumptions and without risk-of-bias assessment. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between October 2015 and September 2024, complemented by AI-assisted discovery tools for citation extension. Reproducibility logs (search strings, run dates, filters, and stepwise counts) were maintained. Of 1751 records retrieved, 245 were included. Evidence was charted by LSD population, intervention class (AI, CC, and other enabling DHTs), outcome domains (patient, health care, and societal), and phase of the care journey. Results: Among 245 included records, 92.2% (226/245) were peer-reviewed, and 7.8% (19/245) were gray literature; no completed and published randomized controlled trials or LSD-specific systematic reviews were identified, with evidence dominated by small, single-center observational studies. Overall, 40 peer-reviewed records reported AI-driven DHTs, 89 reported CC DHTs, and 144 reported other enabling DHTs (some multilabeled). Evidence was concentrated mostly in Gaucher and Fabry diseases. Nearly half of the mapped literature focused on screening and diagnosis, with fewer records addressing treatment intensification, rehabilitation, and end-of-life care. Outcomes were predominantly health care delivery performance measures, with fewer patient and societal outcomes. AI applications mainly supported diagnostic decision support, phenotyping, monitoring, tracking, and risk stratification; CC commonly involved telemedicine, remote monitoring, and patient-engagement platforms; enabling DHTs included interoperable data systems, registries, and digital infrastructures. Conclusions: The evidence base is appreciable for a niche field and reflects growing interest in AI and CC for LSD care, but heterogeneity and methodological limitations preclude inferences on effectiveness or routine implementation. This evidence map highlights relatively stronger areas and gaps, providing a structured foundation to inform timely expert consensus-building and research prioritization. Key priorities include interoperable data infrastructures and data availability, prospective multicenter evaluations, transparent reporting of algorithms and workflows, and implementation-relevant outcomes to support safe, equitable, and scalable adoption aligned with evolving European Union and global rare-disease priorities.

Background: Extant digital multiple health behavior change interventions have shown promise in various populations; however, evidence for a broader approach among the general population is lacking. Moreover, existing interventions often contain several components but are typically assessed as a whole, meaning it remains unclear to what extent individual components contribute to intervention effects and how they may interact to influence health outcomes. Objective: This study estimates the effects of 6 components of a digital health behavior change intervention on alcohol, diet, physical activity, and smoking outcomes among individuals searching for help online. Methods: A double-blind randomized factorial trial design with 6 two-level factors was used. Adults from the general public in Sweden who were seeking help to change their behaviors were recruited through web searches and social media. Participants were eligible if they were 18 years or older and had at least one health behavior classified as unhealthy. Effects of 6 components were estimated: screening/feedback, goal-setting/planning, motivation, skills/know-how, mindfulness, and self-authored SMS text messages. Primary outcomes were weekly alcohol consumption and frequency of heavy episodic drinking, average daily fruit and vegetable consumption, weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and 4-week point-prevalence smoking. Results: A total of 5419 individuals were randomized. Overall, the screening/feedback component was the most effective for changing health behaviors, along with goal-setting/planning and motivation to change. In particular, there was evidence that screening/feedback increased average daily portions of fruit and vegetables at 2 months (mean difference 0.17, compatibility interval [CoI] 0.09-0.25, probability of effect [POE] >99.9%) and at 4 months (mean difference 0.13, CoI 0.04-0.21, POE 99.9%) and reduced the frequency of heavy episodic drinking at 4 months (incidence rate ratio 0.91, CoI 0.81-1.03, POE 94.2%). Components also interacted to further improve health outcomes, most notably the combination of screening/feedback with motivation to change, which further increased fruit and vegetable consumption (2 months: mean difference 0.20, CoI 0.09-0.30, POE >99.9%; 4 months: mean difference 0.17, CoI 0.05-0.29, POE 99.8%). Conclusions: The results from this study contribute to the development of more effective interventions by providing novel insights into the effects of individual and pairwise components of complex digital health behavior change interventions. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN16420548; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16420548

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into education and health care, raising questions about how students use these technologies and how AI influences their learning. In health education, understanding these trends is particularly important because student learning directly impacts future clinical skills. Objective: This study aimed to explore the use of AI tools by health sciences students at the University of Ottawa. More specifically, it sought to identify the most frequently used AI tools, describe students’ usage habits, determine which tools support knowledge acquisition and skill development, and gather students’ recommendations for effective strategies to raise awareness and train their peers on the responsible use of AI. Methods: A qualitative approach was used with students from 10 health professions who reported using AI in their studies. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and an open-ended qualitative online survey. Inductive thematic analysis within an interpretive paradigm was applied to capture patterns, perceptions, and emergent themes. Results: A total of 51 health professions students participated in the study. Most were women between the ages of 20 and 29 years. ChatGPT (OpenAI) emerged as the most frequently used AI tool. Students perceived AI as a complementary tool that facilitated knowledge acquisition, skill development, writing, and problem-solving. AI adoption was driven by curiosity, peer influence, and the desire to improve work efficiency. Students critically evaluated AI results, integrated the tools into their learning processes, and emphasized the importance of technical skills, critical thinking, and digital literacy. Peer learning, hands-on demonstrations, and access to online resources were recommended for effective AI training. Conclusions: This research demonstrates that health professions students actively use AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, to support learning, skill development, and academic tasks. Although AI is valuable as an educational aid and its use varies by student and context, this highlights the need for structured guidance, critical evaluation skills, and peer-supported training. These findings highlight the importance of thoughtfully integrating AI into educational programs to enhance learning outcomes, foster skill acquisition, and ensure responsible and effective adoption.

Nature Medicine, Published online: 02 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04379-6

Author Correction: Real-world clinical utility of tumor whole-genome sequencing in solid cancers

Nature Medicine, Published online: 02 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04281-1

A prespecified analysis from the SELECT trial showed that semaglutide reduces major adverse cardiovascular events by 20% compared with placebo, particularly in patients at high risk of fibrosis, as indicated by the Fibrosis-4 index.

Cell Death Discovery, Published online: 02 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41420-026-03009-x

Correction: The cytotoxicity of gomesin peptides is mediated by the glycosphingolipid pathway and lipid-cholesterol interactions

Oncogenesis, Published online: 01 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41389-026-00611-7

Alternatively activated macrophages cause DNA damage through an arginase 1-mediated bystander effect and promote epithelial cell transformation

A multi-omic single-cell atlas of the aging mouse brain reveals cell-type-specific transposon methylation changes, strengthening of 3D genome boundaries, and regionally heterogeneous aging signatures. These findings offer a resource to understand the molecular mechanisms of brain aging and guide future research on neurodegeneration.

MicrobeAtlas (www.microbeatlas.org) is an integrated, reference-based resource for truly planet-wide microbiomics, analyzing hundreds of thousands of microbial lineages across diverse environments, conditions, and technologies.

Deep proteome profiling of over 5,000 cerebrospinal fluid samples by mass spectrometry maps protein alterations across major neurological disorders, resolving key sources of variation as well as shared and disease-specific signatures. This framework yields a 22-protein assay that improves the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from other inflammatory conditions, particularly in diagnostically challenging oligoclonal band-negative individuals.

Nature, Published online: 01 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10359-0

LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA’s fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog shows evidence of a clear pair-instability gap in the distribution of binary black-hole secondary masses but is absent in the larger primary masses.

Nature, Published online: 01 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10251-x

Robustness checks and reproduction of analyses with existing and updated data based on 110 articles in economics and political science journals with data and code-sharing requirements found high levels of robustness and reproducibility and determined that robustness was not dependent on author characteristics or data availability.

Cell Death Discovery, Published online: 31 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41420-026-03040-y

SNHG10 promotes tumorigenesis through the EGFR/AKT/ERK/mTOR and miR-150-5p/VEGF-A axis, along with gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Nature Medicine, Published online: 31 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04315-8

Benralizumab (an anti-IL-5 receptor α antibody), compared to placebo, significantly reduced the risk of first flare in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome.

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 28 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02574-w

The risk of empty empathy talk and challenges of automated empathy in healthcare communication

Nature Biotechnology, Published online: 27 March 2026; doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03074-8

Unpaired data as a first-order challenge in single-cell and spatial proteomics